The New York Times International - 29.07.2019

(ff) #1

T HE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL EDITION MONDAY, JULY 29, 2019 | 13


NON SEQUITUR PEANUTS

GARFIELD

KENKEN

Answers to Previous Puzzles

WIZARD of ID

DOONESBURY CLASSIC 1993

CALVIN AND HOBBES

DILBERT

Created by Peter Ritmeester/Presented by Will Shortz

SUDOKU No. 2907

Fill the grid so
that every row,
column 3x3 box
and shaded 3x
box contains
each of the
numbers
1 to 9 exactly
once.

Fill the grids with digits so as not
to repeat a digit in any row or
column, and so that the digits
within each heavily outlined box
will produce the target number
shown, by using addition,
subtraction, multiplication or
division, as indicated in the box.
A 4x4 grid will use the digits
1-4. A 6x6 grid will use 1-6.

For solving tips and more KenKen
puzzles: http://www.nytimes.com/
kenken. For Feedback: nytimes@
kenken.com

For solving tips
and more puzzles:
http://www.nytimes.com/
sudoku

KenKen® is a registered trademark of Nextoy, LLC.
Copyright © 2018 http://www.KENKEN.com. All rights reserved.

(c) PZZL.com Distributed by The New York Times syndicate
Solution No. 2707 CROSSWORD | Edited by Will Shortz
Across
1 Major uncertainty
6 Canvas for a tattoo
10 Mae who said “I used
to be Snow White, but
I drifted”
14 “You ___ Beautiful”
(Joe Cocker hit)
15 Mexican entree in a
shell
16 Large fair, informally
17 Athlete with a mitt
19 Bridle strap
20 Poker stake
21 Bill Clinton’s was in
the 1990s
22 ___ Haute, Ind.
23 One going for a stroll
among urban greenery
26 “Quit wasting time!”
30 Abba of Israel
31 Even a little
32 ___-haw

33 Plumbing woe
37 Official hearing a case
41 Fish that wriggle
42 What’s dropped off a
cigarette
43 Words of empathy
44 Weights that may be
“short” or “long”
46 Tevye’s occupation in
“Fiddler on the Roof”
48 Herbie Hancock or
Chick Corea
52 “Later, amigo!”
53 Employ
54 Bleats
58 William with a state
named after him
59 Place where 17-, 23-,
37- and 48-Across
might be found
62 Sheltered from the
wind

63 Parks in civil rights
history
64 Language family of
Africa
65 Loch ___ monster
66 “That’s enough!”
67 Adventurous journey

Down
1 “Ali ___ and the 40
Thieves”
2 Land with an ayatollah
3 Hanukkah “moolah”
4 ___ of Capri
5 Dandyish dresser
6 Van Gogh’s “The ___
Night”
7 Boat you might shoot
rapids in
8 What a “neat” drink
doesn’t come with
9 Word paired with
“neither”
10 “How fortunate for
us!”
11 Apply, as force
12 Former vice president
Agnew
13 Printer cartridge
contents
18 Meadows
22 Airport screening org.
23 Tug on
24 Turn sharply
25 Skeptic’s sarcastic
comment
26 Racehorse’s starting
point

27 Raison d’___
28 Pin the ___ on the
donkey
29 Bomb testing areas
32 “Come again?”
34 Semihard Dutch
cheese
35 City that’s home to
the Taj Mahal
36 Sharp-witted
38 “Is it O.K., mom?”
39 Peak near Olympus

40 Leave at the altar
45 Special ___ (military
missions)
46 Event that’s an
“Oops!”
47 “Ah, makes sense”
48 Where Honda
and Mazda are
headquartered
49 Grammy-winning
singer of “Hello”
50 Fan publications,
informally

51 Bonkers
54 Lover boy
55 Youngest of the
Brontë sisters
56 Things passed in
Congress
57 “___ your piehole!”
59 Surgery sites, for
short
60 Word after waste and
want
61 Cookout, briefly

PUZZLE BY BRUCE HAIGHT
Solution to Jul 27 Puzzle
BOING HEADER
ENCORECURSIVE
TEEBOXRELIEVES
TIDEWATERACCENT
ADULTMALESROO
SAPPHIRESBBGUN
RANATFILET
HIRESJANUS
RAZEDBARGE
MEDEACRIMEBOSS
AMFTEENPEOPLE
LOANTRANSLATION
AVIARISTOTTAWA
LETTUCEWELTER
ASHLEE REEDY

12345678910111213
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 2425
26272829 30

31 32 33343536
37 3839 40
41 42 43
4445 4647
484950 51
52 53 54555657

58 5960 61
62 63 64
65 66 67

sports


To the judge, the math at Paris St.-Ger-
main simply did not add up.
In one free-spending summer in 2017,
P.S.G. made the two most expensive ac-
quisitions in soccer history, paying more
than $400 million to add the star for-
wards Neymar and Kylian Mbappé to
the French champions’ star-studded
roster.
To outsiders, the signings — without
offsetting sales of similar value or a
huge infusion of sponsorship revenue —
simply could not square with European
soccer’s so-called financial fair-play sys-
tem. Those rules, created to reduce
clubs’ indebtedness and level the play-
ing field in an era in which teams were
being infused with cash by billionaires
and nation-states, require clubs to bal-
ance their spending with revenue.
An investigation of P.S.G. was begun.
A report was produced. When it arrived
last June on the desk of José Narciso da
Cunha Rodrigues, a former judge at Eu-
rope’s top court and the chairman of the
UEFA panel that penalizes teams that
break the organization’s financial rules,
he discovered that the lead investigator
had cleared P.S.G.
So after a member of his panel went
through the report, Cunha Rodrigues
sent the file back, demanding that the in-
vestigator, Yves Leterme, a former Bel-
gian prime minister, reassess the case.
In doing so, he also raised questions
about several of Leterme’s conclusions.
“The decision to close the case,”
Cunha Rodrigues wrote, “was mani-
festly erroneous.”
The details of UEFA’s nearly yearlong
investigation of P.S.G., and the fight over
its conclusions, are included in docu-
ments obtained by The New York Times
that repeatedly eviscerate the decision
by UEFA investigators to exonerate the
Qatari-financed club, one of the biggest
spenders in sports. But the documents
also reveal how UEFA appeared to sink
its own investigation, and how P.S.G.
used a technicality to avoid the possibil-
ity of serious punishment and preserve
its cherished place in soccer’s richest
competition, the Champions League.
P.S.G.’s victory also has implications
for a current case — the Premier League
champion Manchester City, whose rise
has been financed by the brother of the
ruler of Abu Dhabi, faces a similar inves-
tigation over suspected financial vio-
lations — and even for the future of fi-
nancial fair play itself, and UEFA’s abil-
ity, and willingness, to enforce its rules.

“There are clubs who could not care
less what their real incomes are when
they want to sign a player, because they
receive incomes from a state,” Javier
Tebas, the head of the Spanish league,
said in May. “It forces other clubs into an
economic situation that is really living
on the edge. It skews the balance of the
entire European soccer structure.”
P.S.G.’s defense in the 2017 case lay in
its accounting, and its argument that
rich sponsorship deals with Qatari enti-
ties like the telecom company Ooredoo,
the Qatar National Bank and, most cru-
cially, the Qatar Tourism Authority had
made the purchases of Neymar and
Mbappé — and other world-class play-
ers — possible.
But Cunha Rodrigues rejected the cal-
culations presented by Leterme in his
report, which favored the French club
and allowed it to fall just within a ratio of
UEFA’s accepted losses.
It would be, Cunha Rodrigues wrote,
“adverse to the interests of clubs com-
peting in UEFA competitions for one

club to maintain a substantial financial
advantage from an erroneous applica-
tion of the regulations by the chief inves-
tigator.”
But there would be no further investi-
gation, and no re-analysis of Leterme’s
decision. P.S.G. appealed the decision by
Cunha Rodrigues’s adjudicatory cham-
ber to send back the file, taking its case
to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
There, it argued that there had been a
procedural error that required Le-
terme’s decision to stand. UEFA sided
with P.S.G., agreeing with the French
club’s interpretation of the rules. Its fail-
ure to back Cunha Rodrigues’s commit-
tee meant the case was closed.
In a statement, UEFA said it had “full
trust in the work” carried out by Le-
terme and Cunha Rodrigues, pointing
out that the committees they oversee
are run independently.
“It is therefore possible that the views
of the members of one chamber are not
always the same of those of the other
chamber,” it said.

The details surrounding the decision
to clear P.S.G. in 2018 have been
shrouded in secrecy, but the documents
reviewed by The Times suggest that, at
the very least, the French champion had
a narrow escape. But the outcome of the
case is likely to lead to further scrutiny
of the close relationship between the
team’s Qatari owners and UEFA.
P.S.G.’s president, Nasser al-Khelaifi,
sits on UEFA’s executive committee and
is also the chairman of beIN Media
Group, the Qatar-based broadcaster
that has committed billions to secure
television rights from UEFA and other
partners.
P.S.G. had been mired in mediocrity
until it was purchased by Qatar’s sover-
eign investment fund, Qatar Sports In-
vestments, in 2011. Having secured
hosting rights to the 2022 World Cup a
year earlier, the tiny Gulf state was ea-
ger to create a superclub that could chal-
lenge established soccer royalty like
Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Man-
chester United. It immediately went on

a spending spree to construct a team,
and an organization, capable of over-
whelming domestic rivals and challeng-
ing for Europe’s biggest trophies. By
2017, it seemed to conclude that Neymar
and Mbappé might put it over the top.
Those high-end, head-spinning pur-
chases came against a backdrop of UE-
FA’s financial regulations, which had
taken full effect a few years earlier. How,
critics and rivals asked, could P.S.G. ex-
ceed the world transfer record not once,
but twice, and stay within the rules?
The solution the club reached — as did
Manchester City, which was accumulat-
ing high-end players in a similar spend-
ing spree — was to sign a slew of spon-
sorship deals and associations with en-
terprises linked to its owners. One in
particular stood out: a huge agreement
with the Qatar Tourism Authority for a
nebulous concept known as “nation
branding” that was booked as P.S.G.’s
highest sponsorship deal, more than 100
million euros, or $111 million, per season.
It was those sponsorship deals that
came under the microscope when P.S.G.,
already penalized for a financial breach
in 2015, came under investigation again
only a month after the Neymar and
Mbappé transfers. Under financial fair-
play rules, clubs are limited to losses of
no more than €30 million over a three-
year period.
To assess the value of P.S.G.’s sponsor-
ships, Leterme, the UEFA financial in-
vestigator, commissioned the sports
marketing company Octagon World-
wide to analyze the agreements. He also
told P.S.G. it could hire a different firm to
conduct its own analysis.
The Octagon version returned a ver-
dict that valued the Qatar tourism
agreement, a sponsorship that had
hardly any visibility, at less than €5 mil-
lion; P.S.G. said its analysis, conducted
for the club by Nielsen, came back with a
figure close to the amount claimed by
P.S.G. Rather than request a third study,
Leterme determined, to the consterna-
tion of members of his investigative
committee, that the Nielsen figures
should be used.
While some members of his panel ve-
hemently disagreed with his decision to
clear P.S.G. — one person familiar with
the committee’s work labeled his conclu-
sions “absurd reasonings” — Leterme’s
decision was nonetheless announced on
June 18, when the world’s soccer media
was focused on the 2018 World Cup that
had kicked off four days earlier.
By Leterme’s calculations, P.S.G. had,
despite its record spending and with the

help of its disputed sponsorships, in-
curred a loss of only €24 million over the
three-year period — just within the
mark that would have caused a referral
for penalties to Cunha Rodrigues’s adju-
dicatory chamber.
“Contrary to the assertion by the
chief investigator, this treatment of the
fair value of the QTA agreement in re-
porting period 2017 was indeed of great
advantage to the club,” Cunha Ro-
drigues wrote. He also pointed to other
agreements that also appeared to be
overvalued, to P.S.G.’s benefit, in Le-
terme’s final report.
This and a number of other findings
led him to the conclusion that the deci-
sion to clear P.S.G. should be “vitiated,”
or scrapped, and that a new investiga-
tion should be undertaken immediately.
But before that could happen, P.S.G.
announced that it was mounting an ap-
peal, saying that there were no grounds
for Cunha Rodrigues to scrap Leterme’s
decision, and that he had missed a 10-
day deadline to conduct a review. Cunha
Rodrigues described that as a “logical
absurdity,” given the amount of work
needed to assess the documents and val-
uations in a financial fair-play case. The
10-day limit, he said, referred to starting
a review, not concluding it.
Galatasaray, a Turkish team that had
reached a settlement with Leterme that
Cunha Rodrigues also wanted re-evalu-
ated, filed a similar appeal to the Court
of Arbitration for Sport a week later.
P.S.G. and UEFA agreed to wait for the
result in the Galatasaray hearing before
resuming the case.
But UEFA, to the horror of Cunha Ro-
drigues and other adjudicatory cham-
ber officials, sided with Galatasaray’s
interpretation of the 10-day limit, and
didn’t even mount a defense. A few
weeks later, it did the same in the P.S.G.
case, and on March 19, in a short news
release, it announced Leterme’s deci-
sion would stand.
“Following a legal assessment made,
with support of external legal counsel,
concerning the interpretation of the
above-mentioned article, UEFA con-
cluded that indeed there were strong ar-
guments supporting the interpretation
presented by the club,” UEFA said in its
statement to The Times.
There are no longer active investiga-
tions into P.S.G. And Neymar and
Mbappé still form one of the most potent
attacking forces on the planet.
Manchester City’s case is up next: Cu-
nha Rodrigues is scheduled to deliver a
verdict later this year.

In P.S.G. case, UEFA surrendered without a fight

BY TARIQ PANJA

Nasser al-Khelaifi, Paris St.-Germain’s president, is on the board of UEFA, whose financial rules the club was accused of violating.

GONZALO FUENTES/REUTERS

РЕЛИЗ ПОДГОТОВИЛА ГРУППА "What's News" VK.COM/WSNWS


РЕ


ЛЛИ

З
ПО

Д
ГО

ТО

ВИ

ЛА

ГР

УП

ПА

"What's

News"

VK.COM/WSNWS
Free download pdf