Daily Mail - 03.03.2020

(John Hannent) #1

Daily Mail, Tuesday, March 3, 2020^ Page 49


H


ealthcare has come
a long way thanks to
human endeavour — but
even occasional human
errors can have disas-
trous consequences.
a misdiagnosis can mean undergoing
unnecessary treatment; a misread scan
can mean a patient is wrongly given the
all-clear. Potentially life-altering or even
life-ending mistakes can be made, even
by excellent doctors.
So the news earlier this year that com-
puter programs can detect breast
tumours better than doctors was hailed
as ‘a huge advance’ by researchers.
the study, published in the journal
Nature, compared the results of
mammograms analysed by doctors with
the same images read by a machine that
had been ‘taught’ to identify tumours.
When the computer was asked to read
images from nearly 29,000 women, the
number of missed cancers — known as
false negatives — fell by 2.7 per cent
compared with when a single doctor
reviewed the scans, while the number of
mammograms incorrectly diagnosed as
abnormal (known as false positives)
decreased by 1.2 per cent.
the machine was as good as two doc-
tors working together — the current
system for reviewing mammograms.
With thousands of women a year mis-
diagnosed in the UK, any improvement
in the reading of scans would be wel-
come — and with an estimated shortage
of more than 1,000 radiologists (doctors
who interpret scans), using technology
to do the work of two doctors could free
up much-needed time for other tasks.
‘this is a huge advance in the poten-
tial for early cancer detection,’ said
study author Dr Mozziyar etemadi, an
assistant professor of anaesthesiology
at Northwestern University in chicago.
however, more research is needed to
work out how such a system could be
introduced, he added.
artificial intelligence (aI) like this —
advanced computer software which not
only carries out tasks but ‘learns’ from
the results — is hailed by some as a pan-
acea for the NhS, which is strained
by increasing patient numbers and

By RACHEL


ELLIS


stalling recruitment and retention
of doctors and nurses.
last year, the Government
announced a £250million aI labo-
ratory that will bring together
research to find solutions to com-
mon healthcare challenges.
‘the idea is that aI can take
some of the workload so that doc-
tors can spend more time with
patients,’ says Sarah Deeny,
assistant director of data analyt-
ics at the independent charity the
health Foundation.
It does look promising, and not
just in the field of breast cancer
diagnosis. research shows aI
could revolutionise diagnostic
testing, predict the most effective
treatments and improve how hos-
pitals are run.

F


or example, it is helping
NhS Blood and transplant
predict how much blood
hospitals will need on any
given day, resulting in 50 per cent
less waste.
a trial, published last year in
Nature, showed aI was better
than specialist doctors at spotting
lung cancer; it also boosted
detection of the cancer by 5 per
cent, while cutting the number of
p e o p l e f a l s e l y d i a g n o s e d b y
1 1 per cent.
It can also identify skin cancers
with the same accuracy as doc-
tors, and was as good as humans
at diagnosing more than 50 eye
conditions in another study.
aI has also been developed to
diagnose atrial fibrillation — an
irregular heartbeat. and last year,
University college hospital in

london came up with an algo-
rithm to flag up patients most
likely to skip appointments. Using
records from 22,000 MrI scan
a p p o i n t m e n t s , t h e p r o g r a m
identified 90 per cent of patients
who would not attend, who could
then be targeted with reminders.
almost eight million appoint-
ments were missed in 2017/18,
according to NhS figures, each
costing the NhS around £120.
addressing the problem could
save almost £1 billion — equiva-
lent to 257,000 hip replacements.
another project by the UK tech
company Brainomix, backed by
pharmaceutical giant Boehringer
Ingelheim, uses aI to interpret
brain scans of people with a sus-
pected stroke — a blockage in the
blood supply to the brain.
By correctly identifying where
the blockage is and the extent of

the damage, patients can be given
clot-busting drugs within the cru-
cial four-and-a-half hour time-
frame, or surgery to restore blood
flow to the brain, to give them the
best chance of recovery.
currently, reading by doctors of
these scans is ‘inconsistent’,
according to Dr George harston,
the company’s chief medical
officer. ‘Problems do get missed,
particularly if a less experienced
doctor is looking at the scan or it
is a non-specialist hospital.’
the Brainomix program analy-
ses ct brain scans in one minute.
this stroke technology has
already been adopted in 20 NhS
hospitals, but in most cases, aI is
not yet widely used in the day-to-
day running of the NhS.
‘We are beginning to see the
benefits of aI in some healthcare
contexts, such as reading scans,’

says Dr rebecca rosen, a GP in
south london and fellow at the
think tank the Nuffield trust.
the key thing which makes
artificial intelligence just that —
intelligent — is it can learn from
the information it receives. But
this creates its own challenges.
‘aI is driven by the data that is
fed into it from which it learns,’
says hugh Whittall, director of
another think tank, the Nuffield
council on Bioethics, which spe-
cialises in the ethical and social
aspects of health policy.
‘If you only have access to data
from a certain population, is that
serving all patients? We know from
facial recognition programs, for
example, that aI is not as good at
recognising the faces of darker-
skinned people, probably because
they are under-represented in the
data used to develop the program,

and that bias is reinforced by the
learning the aI does, making
errors more likely.’
there are also concerns about
p r o t e c t i n g t h e p a t i e n t d a t a
needed to ‘train’ these robots.
In 2017, the royal Free hospital
in london was criticised for shar-
ing 1.6 million patient data records
— including information on men-
tal health history and abortions
— with Google’s aI division, Deep-
Mind, for a trial to monitor and
diagnose acute kidney damage.

T


he Information commis-
sion ruled the hospital had
not done enough to pro-
tect patients’ data.
So, is there a danger that we are
solving one problem with aI, but
creating another? after all, aI is
costly and makes mistakes, too.
‘Because of the human nature of
healthcare, patients want conver-
sations with real doctors, so aI is
most likely to be part of the tech-
nology that helps with diagnosis
and supports decision-making
rather than taking over diagnosis,’
says Mr Whittall.
Sarah Deeny agrees, saying it is
most likely to be helpful for ‘less
high-risk, backroom tasks’ such
as making best use of operating
theatre time so theatres don’t
stand idle, or filing ‘normal’ blood
test results in patient records.
‘You don’t want it to result in
unnecessary extra tests and clini-
cian time,’ she says. ‘For example,
some smartphones can now carry
out pulse checks for an irregular
heartbeat. however, if this tech-
nology were used by the public,
healthy people could be told they
have an irregular pulse when they
don’t. this could result in unnec-
essary additional testing or treat-
ment, and anxiety for patients.
‘Will a highly anxious, risk-averse
patient — or, indeed, any patient
— ever be reassured by a computer
diagnosis? the role of the doctor
is not just to diagnose but to reas-
sure and [guide] patients through
their diagnosis and treatment.’
B u t i t’ s i m p o r t a n t n o t t o
overlook alternative ways of
solving health problems — possibly
e v e n m o r e e f f e c t i v e l y, a d d s
Mr Whittall.
‘there can be a tendency with
new technology to find things for
it to solve,’ he says.
‘take malaria, for example. In
o u r s e a r c h f o r d r u g s a n d
vaccines, there is a danger we
overlook bed nets which can
prevent malaria.
‘there are still many unknowns
about aI, so it is important that
we don’t push this technology
through too quickly.’

As artificial intelligence


proves as effective as


doctors at reading scans...


This week: Emilia
Fox’s arms
Wearing a satin dress that
showed off gym-honed
arms, emilia Fox (right)
oozed elegance on the
red carpet recently.
The 45-year-old actress
is a relatively recent con-
vert to the gym. ‘i run and
lift weights,’ she has said.
‘it makes me feel more
confident, stronger — and
i don’t mean physically.’
WHAT TO TRY: The curl-to-front-press
exercise targets the biceps and shoulder
muscles for all-round toned arms. Hold a

dumbbell in each hand.
Stand with feet hip-width
a p a r t w i t h we i g h t s
against your thighs, palms
facing your body. Bend
your elbows and curl
weights up to shoulder
height. Then stretch
arms straight out in
front so they are level
with shoulders (palms
should be facing the
floor). Keeping your
core muscles engaged, bend the
elbows back in by your sides and lower
back to the start position. repeat 15
times and perform three sets.

How to get the enviable


physiques of the stars


SECRETS OF AN


A-LIST


BODY


Would


you trust


a computer


to diagnose


your illness?


Picture: GeTT y IMaGes/IsTock
PhoTo
Free download pdf