Videomaker (2019-05)

(Antfer) #1
contents

full screen


print

contents

full screen

print

8 VIDEOMAKER >>> MAY 2019


But, the sky’s the limit when it
comes to customization. This handy
menu can be customized to your
preference. Overall, we preferred us-
ing this menu over customizing actual
buttons on the body of the camera.
However, for those who want to use
the buttons, they also allow for lots of
customization to suit the user’s needs
and wants. This includes two function
buttons located where your fingertips
fall when gripping the camera. We like
these buttons, but those with small
hands may struggle to reach them.
The camera has all of the but-
tons and knobs you would expect an
interchangeable-lens camera to have.
It has a function control wheel for
quick shooting mode changes and in-
cludes three user programmed modes.
It has a very easy to read control panel
on top that switches depending on
whether you’re shooting photos or
video. Plus, it has a front trigger wheel
and a dial for your thumb to control
shutter and aperture.
Because this camera can do a lot
and allows for a fair amount of cus-
tomization, the usability of the menu
will affect a shooters ability to get the
shot — for better or worse. We didn’t
have any problem finding anything
in the menu that you would need to
change often or quickly. However, for
those features that you don’t need all
the time, you might have to dig a bit to
find them.

Here are the tests!
We put the camera through a gamut of
tests to evaluate its low light perfor-
mance, rolling shutter, moire, battery
life, overheating potential, image
quality at high frame rates, autofocus,
10-bit capture, N-Log capture and
vibration reduction.

Low light performance
Let’s start off with its low light per-
formance because our results were
impressive. We tested by capturing an
image at ISO 100 with proper expo-
sure and doubled the ISO for each
shot while adjusting the shutter speed
to counter the added light at every
stop. This gives us a view of when
noise is introduced into the image.
We shot in 4K in both in FX and DX
mode, noting a difference in perfor-
mance when the sensor is cropped. In
FX mode, noise starts at ISO 6400 but
is good all the way up to ISO 25,
before the image starts to be drastically
affected by the noise. When shooting
in cropped DX mode, noise starts a stop
earlier at around ISO 3,200. Still, the
image is usable until ISO 12,800. That’s
quite fantastic and definitely above
other cameras priced similarly.

Rolling shutter and moire
Next, we tested the rolling shutter of
the camera. We did the same test in
4K and HD in 24fps and in 120fps. A
rolling shutter exposes each pixel for

the same amount of time but doesn’t
capture the same moment in time.
This causes lines to appear to bend
when the camera moves quickly.
We tested this by panning the
camera starting at a slow speed and
ramping up to a whip pan while
focused on a vertical line, in our case
a c-stand. The Z6 has a rolling shutter,
so we expected to see some rolling
shutter effect. However, the effect was
slight, it was consistent in 4K, HD and
at 120fps.
Moving on to testing moiré, we shot
a DSC Labs sine zone chart to see how
well the camera captured fine lines.
Typically, a lens is at its sharpest at f/
or f/11, so we tested both. We panned
and tilted the camera to see if the fine
lines bounced around or danced but
saw no moiré issues at either f/8 or f/11.

Battery life and heat test
Next up was our test for battery life.
This is a relatively simple test: Set the
camera at its max resolution and frame
rate and capture video until the battery
runs out while keeping track of the
time. This is also a good time to observe
whether or not the camera overheats
along the way. We saw a long battery
life of two hours and 10 minutes or 130
minutes. The camera got warm over
that period of time but had no perfor-
mance change as a result.

Shooting at
high frame rates
The Z6 will shoot up to 120 frames
per second in HD, so we wanted to
see if the high frame rate video was as
good as standard frame rates. Cine-
matic slow motion is typically 60 fps.
With double that, the Z6 can extend
any action by a factor of 5 when slow-
ing 120fps to 24fps. The camera can
either capture the footage at 120fps
and keep that frame rate or convert
in-camera to allow for slow motion
playback. Many times, when a camera
converts internally, it affects the qual-
ity of the video, but not with the Z6.
Regardless of where the slow down
happens, the outcome is the same —
with one caveat. When the camera
slows it down for you, no audio is

Tilting rear display

Nikon Z


REVIEW

384 R02 Nikon Z 6.indd 8 3/19/19 2:06 PM

VIDEOMAKER >>> MAY 2019 9


captured. However, when comparing
the quality of the image at 120fps to
some shot at 24fps, we saw no quality
loss between the two. That can’t be
said about the Sony a7 III.

Autofocus
and vibration reduction
Good autofocus is a difficult thing to
obtain for video shooters. If it’s not
perfect, it’s not good enough. If the
camera struggles even a little bit, it
could ruin a shot. Though the Z6 has
quick AF when using tap focus on the
monitor, it struggles when shooting
a subject that is moving quickly. We
tested continuous AF and full-time AF
to track a toy. Instead of moving the
subject, we moved the camera on a
motorized slider. We started at a shal-
low depth of field at f/1.8.
When moving slow, the camera
kept up with the movement and kept
the toy in focus. After testing with
multiple speed and sensitivity settings,
we found full-time AF to be the best
option. Once we ramped up the speed,
the camera had a difficult time finding
focus on our subject. This is true even
when changing the AF selection area.
Single point AF worked okay, and so
did auto-area AF. However, Wide-area
AF (S) and wide-area AF (L) worked
best, though neither was great at f/1.8.
We then did the same test at f/4 and
found that the deeper depth of field al-
lowed the lens to track better. Though
we were not able to get it to continue
any track once the subject left the
frame or was obstructed by something
else. Overall, autofocus would work
in a situation where you had a deep
depth of field and the subject had a
strong contrast from its background.
Otherwise, we would say to stick to
manual focus.
Let’s move on to image stabilization
with Nikon’s five-axis vibration reduc-
tion in the Z6. You can use the sensor
stabilization either by itself or in coor-
dination with a lens with image stabili-
zation. Plus, you can add in electronic
stabilization for super smooth footage,
though electronic stabilization does
result in a slight crop. The stabilization
looked good and did not draw atten-

tion to itself, countering most of the
camera shake. Is it a gimbal replacer?
No, but when shooting handheld you
can expect to have usable footage that
isn’t shaky.

External recording
Because the camera can not capture
internal 10-bit, we used an Atomos
Shogun Inferno to capture 10-bit
externally via the HDMI. This is a
nice set up as it also allows for longer
than 30-minute clips. We don’t have
a LUT for N-Log and couldn’t find any
online. However, we found that a LUT
for Canon C-Log to REC 709 got us
close enough for a secondary grade.
N-Log is not too radical and fairly easy
to grade overall.

Marketplace
We did say that this is the best full-
frame camera for video shooters for
the money, so let’s take a look at the
competition, starting with the Sony a
III. The a7 II is $2,000, the same price
as Z6. It has good in-body image stabi-
lization and offers S-log3 with average
low light performance.
The Sony only captures 8-bit in-
ternally or externally, with no option
to capture anything higher. It has a
24-megapixel full-frame sensor with
693 point hybrid AF that uses both
contrast and phase detection. This
camera also has the same kind of tilt-
ing screen as the Z6, but offers dual
SD card slots
Next up is the Canon EOS R at
$2,300. It has the most flaws for video
shooters of all the full-frame mirror-
less cameras out there, starting with
its 1.7 times crop in 4K. This wouldn’t
be a big deal if you have the right
lenses, but you are paying for full-
frame sensor and you don’t get that
value when shooting in 4K.
Canon offers a decent selection of
native RF lenses, but they are on the
high end of the price range. The EOS
R offers C-Log and 10-bit output via
HDMI. It has average low light perfor-
mance and just a single media card
slot. This camera uses a higher mega-
pixel full frame sensor at 30.3MP and
has dual-pixel CMOS autofocus with

5,655 autofocus points. Lastly, its fully
articulating screen is 3.15 inches.
Last is the Panasonic Lumix S1 for
$2,500. Costing $500 more than the
Z6, it’s a formidable foe to the Z6. It
offers limited 10-bit internal capture
currently, with more promised in a fu-
ture paid firmware upgrade. It shoots
up to UHD 4K at 60 frames per second
to dual card slots for XQD and SD
cards. The biggest flaw of the S1 is that
it’s high frame rate mode only shoots
in auto exposure.
The S1 also has a 24 MP full-frame
sensor, along with a triaxial tilt screen,
which just means you get one more
movement over the Z6 and a7 III. It’s
still not fully articulated like the EOS
R. The S1 has a contrast detect 255
area autofocus system with in-body
stabilization called sensor-shift image
stabilization. The S1 doesn’t have a log
gamma, but that future paid firmware
upgrade should solve that as well. The
cost and release date of the upgrade
are still unknown.

Final thoughts
and recommendation
The Nikon Z6 has a very nice, high-
quality image, great low light perfor-
mance and a long battery life. We re-
ally like being able to crop your sensor
at will and shoot slow motion up to
120 frames per second. Plus, there’s
no quality loss at that higher frame
rate. If you shoot handheld, the Z6 has
you covered with five-axis vibration
reduction, perfect for keeping away
the shake. Add with the current 10-bit
output and 12-bit coming soon, it gets
even more exciting. The Z6 also has
Nikon’s first log profile with N-Log.
If you’re looking for an affordable
full-frame mirrorless camera for video
shooting — along with affordable
lenses and a rich feature set — you
should look at the Nikon Z6. We were
super impressed.

You can comment on this article by going on-
line: http://www.videomaker.com/?p=

Chris Monlux is Videomaker’ s Multimedia Edi-
tor.

Nikon Z


REVIEW

384 R02 Nikon Z 6.indd 9 3/19/19 2:06 PM
Free download pdf