220 MARK HANSELL
matively but still appropriately paraphrased by (38b-c) and (39b-c) respec
tively.
These examples show that Chao's modification vs. complementation
distinction cannot be applied to productive serial verb constructions of
either the SVC type or of the CC type. (In fact it could very well be that the
distinction applies only to simplex clauses or complex sentences that show
one VP clearly subordinate.)
5. Clause linkage in Mandarin serial verbs
5.1 RRG clause linkage vs. conjoined structures
5.1.1 Scope of operators
A Chao-type analysis of CCs and SVCs as qualitatively different construc
tion types (compounds, with V > V+V structure in the case of CCs, and
conjunctions or subordinations, with VP+VP structure in the case of SVCs)
is at first glance supported by differences in the scope of operators like
illocutionary force, modality, and aspect. RRG, however, gives a princi
pled account of which operators have scope over which elements in the var
ious types of junctures, allowing the possibility of a non-ad hoc unified
description.
The first operator is illocutionary force. Illocutionary force is a clausal
operator; it has scope over the whole clause. This means that while a clausal
juncture may or may not have both its juncts under the scope of the same
illocutionary force marker, a core or nuclear juncture must have both of the
linked elements under the scope of the same illocutionary force operator:
(40) a. Ni shì bu shì dà diànhuà zhâo läo Wang?
you be NEG be call telephone seek old (name)
"Are you calling to find Old Wang?/
Is it by calling on the phone that you're finding Old Wang?"
(Interrogative can have scope over either the entire sentence, as in the first
reading, or over the first junct only, as in the second reading.)
b. Nï dâ diànhuà shì bu shì zhäo läo Wang?
you call telephone be NEG be seek old (name)
"Is it to find Old Wang that you're calling?"