Advances in Sociophonetics

(Darren Dugan) #1

Chapter 3. Derhoticisation in Scottish English: A sociophonetic journey 63


instances of both variants. Middle-class speakers tended to be rhotic, with both
older and younger speakers favouring postalveolar and/or retroflex approximants,
especially younger middle-class girls. (If articulatory /r/ was produced by work-
ing-class speakers, it was usually a tap.)
Overall, the evidence for the twentieth century suggests the development of a
socially-stratified rhotic-derhotic continuum in the Scottish English of the Central
Belt, with weakly articulated, or vocalized, rhotics in working-class speech con-
trasting with audibly strong rhotic approximants in the aspiring middle-classes.
We now turn to the sociolinguistic evidence for the progress of derhoticisation,
and the corresponding development of the continuum, in the early 21st century.



  1. Derhoticisation in Scottish English in the 2000s


In 2003, a further corpus of Glaswegian was collected from an age-stratified
sample of working-class speakers from the same area as the 1997 corpus (e.g.
Stuart-Smith 2006; Stuart-Smith & Timmins 2010). Figure 2 shows the substantial
derhoticisation that was found in these speakers. Like Romaine (1978), derhoti-
cisation was more prevalent in read wordlists. This stylistic shift away from the
regional standard norm (rhoticity) in a reading task confirms that this feature still
carries the kind of covert prestige suggested by Johnston.


0%
1F

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1M 2F 2M 3F 3M 4F 4M

[Vh]
[V]
[V^]
[r]

Figure 2. Distribution of variants of postvocalic /r/ in 48 speakers of Glaswegian in 2003,
n = 1889. M = male, F = female; 1 = 10–11 years; 2 = 12–13 years; 3 = 14–15 years; 4 = 40–60
years. [r] = articulated variants of /r/; [V^] = vowels with audible pharyngealisation/
uvularisation; [V] = plain vowel; [Vh] = vowel followed by audible frication.

Free download pdf