A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali)

(Jeff_L) #1
118 3 Phonology

3.4.5.3 Final-Syllable V ("f')


The formatives in (88.b), above, target the V of the final syllable of the stem.

This is a simple and unproblematic formulation. The clear cases of χ-f in verbs

are illustrated in (91).

(91) Final-Syllable Vowel (Long Imperfectives)

gloss Shlmpf LoImpfP formatives

a. 'be tamed' -akufad- -t-lkufud- χ-f (+ χ-pcl)

'gallop' -asddaerbae-t -t-adaerba-t X-f(+ χ-pcl)

'be slippery' -aszzaelbasbbaey- -t-azselbaebbay- χ-f (+χ-pcl)

b. 'have a scare' -serraeft -t-araefta- χ-f (+χ-pcl)

'be implanted' -eert -YQtt — (only χ-pcl)

'destroy' -ahlak- -hallask- — (only χ-pcl)

'make curdle' -s-aslay -s-aslay- X-f(+ X-Pcl)

'be churned' -andu- -niddu- — (only χ-pcl)

c. 'hit' -awat- -(t)-awwat- x-f

For purposes of (91), we focus on the χ-f that lengthens the last V, not on

χ-pcl applying to the first postconsonantal V. The target location for χ-f is

unproblematic in (91.a). However, (91.b-c) bring out some issues involving the

relationship between χ-f and the other lengthening formative χ-pcl.

(91.b) show that χ-f cannot apply if χ-pcl has applied to the V of the

immediately preceding syllable, except in causatives. In other words, there is a

minor χ-clash avoidance principle here. This is vaguely rhythmical (metrical)

in nature, but either χ-f and χ-pcl can apply with no difficulty to short V's in

spite of an adjacent full-V syllable whose full V is lexical, as in 'be tamed' in

(91.a). Both χ-pcl and χ-f apply audibly in 'have a scare' (91.b), as well as the

cases in (91.a), because there is an intervening syllable. In causative 'make

curdle', both apply even in the absence of the intervening syllable, since

causatives do not respect clash avoidance. However, 'be implanted' (-vrti>)

which like 'have a scare' (-rvftu-) is an unaugmented V-final verb, does not

allow χ-f, since the final (underlying) syllable is adjacent to that already

targeted by χ-pcl. Likewise, 'destroy' allows only χ-pcl.

There is a substantive difference between χ-pcl and χ-f that permits us to

identify them in otherwise ambiguous cases. This is that χ-pcl is observable

only in the LoImpfP, while χ-f applies throughout the long imperfective

system (LoImpfP, LoImpfN, Prohib). For example, 'gallop' in (91.a) has

LoImpfP -t-adaerba-t, LoImpfN (i.e. after Neg waer) -t-adarbi-t, and Prohib

-t-aedaerba-t. All three show the final-syllable full V (χ-f), but only the

LoImpfP shows the full V after the first C position (in this case, -t-).
Free download pdf