138 3 Phonology
Unlike the case with non-augment verbs, with augment verbs the
shortening also applies to high V's {i u}, which merge into the only short high
vowel 3. This is seen in Imprt and other short imperfective stems. In (114), the
LoImpfP shows a stem-final u or i, corresponding to a in the Shlmpf.
(114) Imprt of Augment Verb 'fly away'
gloss stem (plus -t-) LoImpfP Imprt
a. 'be dying' -jvrvri- -t-ljrari-t jarara-t
b. 'ruin' -s-vmrsu- -s-lmarsu-t s-ammarsa-t
There is good evidence that augment stems are V-final, cf. VblN ά-farru
(dialectally ae-farru) for 'fly away', a-jrsri for 'be dying', and a-s-ammarsu
for 'ruin'.
When an ablaut lengthening formative "protects" the stem-final V, it
appears as a full V. This is seen in all long imperfectives, which have a
formative χ-f in the final stem syllable, e.g. LoImpfP i-t-lfarru-t 'he flies
away' and the LoImpfP forms in (114).
There is one other exception to shortening with augment verbs. Some
augment verbs belong at least loosely to the category of "adjectival" verb.
The two diagnostics for adjectival verb are irregular perfectives, and avoidance
of the χ-pcl ablaut formative in the Resit stem. Of these diagnostics, irregular
perfectives are pertinent here. There are at least seven augment verbs with
PerfP CsCa-t- or CaCa-t- (dsema-t- 'be light reddish brown', daera-t- 'be
brown', kaesa-t- 'be speckled', m£eja-t 'be spotted', dala-t- 'be green',
mala-t- 'be white on head', fawa-t- 'be brown'), see (372.d) in §7.3.1.6 an
(393) in §7.3.1.13. In these stems, which often keep the -t- even before
V-initial suffixes, there is no V-Shortening before -t-. Their MaSg and FeSg
participles have either χ or e by VV-Contraction (37.d), e.g. MaSg dseme-n
(T-ka) or daeme-n (A-grm) 'light reddish brown', dalae-n (T-ka) or dale-n
(A-grm) 'green'.
The rule can be formulated as (115).
(115) Pre-Augment V-Shortening (Augment Verbs)
stem-final α —> as and {i u} —> a before Augment -t-
A similar Stem-Final V-Shortening applies to stem-final α (but not other
vowels) before Centripetal -\add after VV-Contraction; see §10.2.1.1.
With augment verbs, there is no real "jurisdictional" issue between Pre-
Augment V-Shortening and VV-Contraction (37). This is because
VV-Contraction applies to augment verbs in combination with V-initial
suffixes in a manner that preserves the stem-final full V, whereby i and u
survive to the surface and Id surfaces as e.