A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali)

(Jeff_L) #1
308 7 Verbal morphology

(310.g), there is already a full V in the relevant position, so χ-pcl applies

vacuously.

In (310.e-g), because the V targeted by χ-pcl happens to be the antepenult

or earlier, this grammatical accent is overridden by Default Accentuation. In

(310.e-f) at least χ-pcl is audible in the form of the i vowel, but in (3lO.g)

there is no audible difference between the PerfP and the Resit.

In (310.b-c), the only audible distinguishing feature of the Resit is the

accent, either because χ-pcl is suspended (adjectival verbs) or because the

targeted V in question is already full so χ-pcl has no audible effect. If suffixes

and/or clitics are added to Resit verbs of types (310.b-c), so that the

grammatical accent χ-pcl is overridden by Default Accentuation (or by an

accented directional clitic), there is again no audible difference between PerfP

and Resit.

As detailed in §3.5.3.1, §8.5.2, and §12.1, χ-pcl is erased in Resit verbs

and Resit participles in definite relative clauses. This eliminates the

distinguishing i in (310.d-f), and the distinctive lengthening of the final-

syllable stem-vowel in (310.a). However, the erasure does not affect χ-pcl (i.e.

accent), so certain types of verbs maintain the PerfP/Reslt opposition even in

definite relative clauses, viz., the verbs in (310.a-d), provided that the accented

V is in the penult or final of the word and is not followed by an accented

directional clitic or by a suffix that forces penultimate accent.

In light V-final stems, i.e. -VC(C)u- (V = short or full vowel, υ = full

vowel), e.g. 'go to' in (309.c) with PerfP -skka- and Resit -akkd-, the only

difference is accent when no subject suffix is added: 3MaSg PerfP 1-kka, Resit

i-kkd. However, when subject suffixes are added to light V-final verbs, the

suffix creates an environment that permits χ-pcl (in addition to χ-pcl) to

apply. Thus 3MaPl PerfP Skkae-n (with Presuffixal α-Shortening (112) and

VV-Contraction (37.d)) and Resit akkd-n, 3FePl akkae-naet and Resit

skkd-naet, where the Resit forms have a lengthened as well as accented stem-

final ά. For all other verb types, including heavy V-final verbs and all C-final

verbs, suffixes are not a factor in ablaut. This shows that the scope of ablaut,

in the case of light V-final verbs, consists of the stem plus up to the first

suffixal C, hence all of 3MaPl /akka-aen/, and all of 3FePl /akka-nast/ except

the final ast. In §7.2.2.3, below, we will see that the same definition of domain

works for PerfN ablaut.

In causatives, a Resit stem beginning in -s-ί... might be mistaken (by a

non-native speaker) for a LoImpfP. This is because many causative LoImpfP

forms begin in -s-ί.... However, the Resit stem will always have a low V at

least in its final syllable, while a LoImpfP stem beginning with i (i.e. with

melody) will have high vowels through to the end of the stem.

Examples of the resultative are in (311).

(311) a. t-3dds-\taen t-orhanna η "a-sni

3FeSgS-touch.Reslt-\3MaP10 Fe-disease Poss Sg-blood

'Blood disease has touched (=afflicted) them (livestock).'
Free download pdf