A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali)

(Jeff_L) #1
630 12 Extraction processes

b. w-ά
Ma-Dem.Sg
'what we get'

na-jaerraew
lPlS-get.LoImpfP

c. w-ά
Ma-Dem.Sg
'what he eats'

i-taett
3MaSgS-eat.LoImpfP

d. w-ά na-taett
Ma-Dem.Sg lPl-eat.LoImpfP
'what we eat'
[dialectally: w-ά n-taett]

It remains to account for the few forms that undergo χ-Erasure (i.e. loss of
ablaut accent). χ-Erasure (136) applies to verbs when Rightward Accent Shift
(132) has placed the accent on a stem-final deletable V, as this V is then
deleted or contracted (by VV-Contraction). The examples involve -CaCC- and
-t-lC(C)- (underlying /-CaCCA-/ and /-t-iC(C)i-/) LoImpfP stems, specifically
in the 3FeSg subject form, as in (720). The 3FeSg prefix is segmentally
unexpressed on the surface (Prefixal t-Deletion (35)), and the entire verb form
ends up being totally unaccented, resulting in a phrasal accent on the
demonstrative. Even with -tdtt- 'eat', χ-Erasure does not apply to 3MaSg or
1P1 forms whose prefix is segmentally nonzero, because they are not subject to
Rightward Accent Shift, as seen in (719.c-d) above.

(720) w-ά 0-taett
Fe-Dem.Sg.Sg 3FeSgS-eat.LoImpfP
'what she eats'

In the PerfP, PerfN, and Shlmpf, there is no difference between the form
of the inflected verb in ordinary clauses and in non-subject relatives. A PerfP
example is (721).

(721) kaeyy [1 awast-aer]
2MaSg [Dem hit.PerfP-lSgS]
'you-MaSg whom I hit'

Examples including preverbal particles are in (722). Future ad is replaced
by its non-clause-initial variant mar (or dialectal variant) (722.b).


(722) a. ae-habs [w-α war i-nhey]
Sg-man [Ma-Dem.Sg Neg 3MaSgS-see.PerfN]
'the man whom he did not see'
Free download pdf