exist, both in how linguistically diverse children at preschool are
approached and in teacher attitudes towards language models.
Also referring to the situation in Europe, Karlfried Knapp says:
I can only speak for the situation in Germany here, which is deplorable.
Apart from adopting more communicative approaches to teaching (as a
consequence of the pragmatic turn in the 1970s), a greater tolerance for
errors (as a consequence of early sequence-oriented SLA research in the
1980s) and a more recent acknowledgement of linguistic diversity in the
foreign language classroom (with little practical consequences), recent
developments in AL so far have had an impact on language education in
Germany only here and there. One main reason for this is the fact that
language teachers in Germany are educated as philologists in thefirst
place, with a strong emphasis on literature in their courses of study, and
that acquiring background knowledge relevant for the practical task of
teaching languages, such as knowledge from AL, occupies only a rather
small part of their training.
This supports Johannes Wagner’s point mentioned above.
10.5 Some impact
AL research has done better in some contexts (subdomains of AL and geo-
graphical domains) than others, according to Patricia Duff:
Educational practice is influenced by much more than theory and
research, e.g. by parental or participant demand, by language education
policies, institutional constraints, etc. I think there are more options
now for learning and for accessing different tools independently, e.g., via
the internet, distance learning, etc., than ever before. Immersion (one
way and two-way), CLIL, corpus-based/data-driven, usage-based and
multimodal approaches have definitely improved because of AL research.
Nina Spada concludes that:
AL has had an influence/impact on some aspects of language education
but it is difficult to measure the extent to which it has had any direct
improvements on language education, particularly when“improvement”
is measured in terms of language outcomes in relation to amount of
classroom instruction. In my opinion, a number of areas within AL have
impacted on language education, and this is mainly due to the fact that
applied linguists do often adopt an interdisciplinary approach. Learning
theory and cognitivism have informed and guided teaching and classroom
practice towards more process orientation and learner-centeredness, or
The impact of AL research 125