The Economist UK - 22.02.2020

(Nandana) #1

14 The EconomistFebruary 22nd 2020


Letters are welcome and should be
addressed to the Editor at
The Economist, The Adelphi Building,
1-11 John Adam Street, LondonWC 2 N 6 HT
Email: [email protected]
More letters are available at:
Economist.com/letters

Letters


Disruption and competition
Schumpeter’s otherwise
worthy encomium for Clayton
Christensen makes the mistak-
en claim that he asserted a
monopoly on disruptive
wisdom (February 1st). After
his seminal “The Innovator’s
Dilemma”, Clayton only ever
wrote with co-authors, and he
took every opportunity to
attribute the staying power of
the theory to other writers, for
he valued work that challenged
the theory even more than
work that confirmed it.
Furthermore, claiming that
Clayton “shrugged off” Apple
and “brushed off” Tesla and
Uber is also mistaken. Clayton
pointed out, correctly, that
these companies were not
following a disruptive path to
success over rivals. Apple
disrupted the personal com-
puter, but it did not disrupt
Nokia or BlackBerry: it out-
competed them in good old-
fashioned Michael Porter style.
Clayton’s mistaken prediction
that Apple would fail led him
to develop a more careful
specification of the limits of
disruption theory, which
places his work within the
context of other theories that
explain different phenomena.
Subsequent analyses of Tesla
and Uber (neither of which
have followed disruptive paths
regards relevant competitors)
reflect this. That is a story of
learning and progress to which
we should all aspire.
michael raynor
Mississauga, Canada

Nevada? South Carolina?
The answer to Lexington’s
question “Could it be Bernie?”
is a resounding no (January
25th). It is inconceivable to me,
a life-long Republican who will
not be voting for Donald
Trump, that the Democrats
could choose the only person
whom Mr Trump could beat.
When Bernie Sanders jumped
to the lead, Mr Trump tweeted
nice things about him. He
knows he can beat Bernie with
an impeached arm tied behind
his back. The Democrats’ man-
tra should be electability, plain
and simple. Choosing Bernie

would only show that they can
screw up the sleeves on a vest.
stephen cooney
Pottstown, Pennsylvania

Treating transgender kids
Regarding puberty blockers for
transgender children (“Pill-
pushers”, February 1st), it broke
our hearts to watch our bril-
liant, funny kid descend into a
deep depression once puberty
started. It took every ounce of
courage she had to tell us she
was transgender. We took her
at her word, and have sup-
ported her these past two years
as she began her transition. We
were told of the risks of hor-
mone therapy, but for us there
was never any question. On
hormones, our child has a
chance for a happy and fulfill-
ing life. Without them, we
might have lost her, and that is
a risk we simply were not
willing to take.
jessica veter
Dundas, Canada

Debt and private equity
Your otherwise excellent re-
port on private markets repeat-
ed a well-known shibboleth in
private equity (“Privacy and its
limits”, February 1st). This is
the idea that buy-outs use high
external debt levels to sharpen
the performance of operating
managers, which is sometimes
called the “discipline of debt”.
For 30 years the story has
been that high debt levels give
buy-out managers a financial
incentive to focus on maxi-
mising cashflow. On the face of
it that sounds plausible. The
flaw in the argument where
private equity is concerned is
that buy-out firms already have
all the financial incentive they
need: their “carried interest”
typically pays them 20% of the
profits they generate. The idea
that buy-out firms need high
interest payments as well as
this incentive to focus on
cashflow defies belief.
High debt levels in private
equity are not just logically
redundant. At least one empiri-
cal example shows high debt is
unnecessary in practice, too.
Melrose Industries, a publicly
listed company, follows a

strategy which it calls “Buy,
Improve, Sell”. This is private
equity in all but name. Melrose
has generated high returns and
its market capitalisation is
now almost £12bn ($15.5bn).
But Melrose has not needed
high leverage. It makes a point
of using the lower debt levels
seen in quoted companies.
It suits buy-out insiders
and investors to suggest that
their use of high debt involves
more than just financial engi-
neering. Unfortunately, this
idea fails to pass muster either
in theory or in practice.
peter morris
London

Keep ’em peeled
Without more resources, you
say, increasing the number of
police officers in Britain will
result in more of the accused in
courts and more prisoners
(“What’s going wrong here?”,
January 18th). But there is also
an opportunity cost. Bobbies
on the beat are associated with
crime prevention. Potential
criminals feel more restrained
if detection rates improve and
they think they could get
caught. So if 20,000 extra
police are put on the streets
and into detection and tech-
nology channels, a lot of crime
could be prevented.
deep sagar
Former chair
Audit and assurance board
National Police Chiefs’ Council
Berkhamsted,Hertfordshire

The coronavirus epidemic
You hold a prejudice against
China’s political system when
reporting on the country’s fight
against the coronavirus epi-
demic (Chaguan, February 1st).
The Communist Party puts a
priority on people’s lives and
health. President Xi Jinping
has set up a task force to lead
effective prevention and con-
trol, describing the coronavi-
rus as a “devil”, which “we will
not let hide”. Under strong
leadership China has taken
swift and concerted action to
contain the disease. Infor-
mation has been released in an
open and transparent manner.
China has closely co-operated

with the whoand the wider
international community to
safeguard the safety of people
in Hubei province, in China
and in the world.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreye-
sus, the who’s director-gen-
eral, has hailed the speed and
scale of China’s actions. He has
said that other countries
should learn from China’s
experience, pointing out that
President Xi’s personal guid-
ance and deployment show his
great leadership capability.
Turning a blind eye to
China’s hard efforts and their
effective results and trying to
politicise the issue is not con-
ducive to the prevention and
control of the novel coronavi-
rus epidemic. The Chinese
people are united and have full
confidence that we can win
this battle.
zeng rong
Spokesperson of the Chinese
Embassy
London

Love will tear us apart
The Graphic detail on why
people listen to sad songs in
February (February 8th)
brought to mind “The Saddest
Music in the World”. Directed
by Guy Maddin, known for his
homages to Russian and Ger-
man Expressionist films, it
stars Isabella Rossellini as a
brewery heiress with plexi-
glass prosthetic legs (filled
with beer, of course). She holds
a contest to find which country
has the saddest music, parody-
ing the Olympics. Great fun.
keith carlson
Belmont, Massachusetts

Missing from your analysis
was the Valentine’s Day factor.
That’s the time when broken
hearts get to see their ex-
partner Instagramming cuddly
pictures with their new catch.
There’s no happiness in that.
zumme mphatso chirwa
Blantyre, Malawi
Free download pdf