65
A schemer through and through,
Jeanne de la Motte escaped prison
dressed as a boy. She fled to London
where she wrote a memoir of the
diamond necklace scandal in which
she defended her actions.
See also: The Crawford Inheritance 66–67 ■ Frank Abagnale 86–87 ■ Clifford Irving 88–89
CON ARTISTS
to acquire it, sensing the ideal
opportunity for her financial and
social advancement. Among her
acquaintances was Cardinal Louis
de Rohan, who had fallen out of
favour with the queen and was
eager to reconcile. In 1784, Jeanne
convinced the cardinal that she
enjoyed Marie Antoinette’s favour
and tricked him into writing to the
queen. De la Motte’s accomplice
Rétaux de Villette forged replies
from “the queen” on gilt-edged
stationery. The exchanges became
so amorous that de Rohan believed
he and the queen were in love.
After requests from de Rohan for
the pair to meet, Jeanne hired a
prostitute to impersonate Marie
Antoinette and organized a
rendezvous in the gardens of the
Palace of Versailles. Having
gained his trust, Jeanne informed
de Rohan that the queen wanted to
buy the diamond necklace, but
could not be seen to do so at a time
when many people in Paris were
starving. De Rohan agreed to cover
the cost in instalments and the
jewellers handed over the necklace.
Fraud exposed
When de Rohan’s first payment was
insufficient, the jewellers protested
to Marie Antoinette, but she denied
requesting the necklace. De Rohan
was brought before the king and
queen to explain himself and the
swindle was finally exposed. The
prostitute and the de la Mottes
were convicted and Villette was
banished, but de Rohan was
acquitted. De la Motte was publicly
flogged and branded with a “V” for
voleuse (robber) and imprisoned but
escaped ten months later. Already
made a scapegoat for the country’s
financial plight, the trial destroyed
the queen’s fragile reputation.
Eight years later, she was executed
during the French Revolution. The
necklace was never found. ■
Preying on vulnerability
Jeanne de la Motte executed a
near-perfect confidence trick to
dupe Cardinal de Rohan, first
seducing him, then preying on
his desperation, vulnerability,
and vanity. She also waited until
she had earned his trust before
asking anything of him in return.
However, she did make one
potentially fatal error, signing the
notes from the queen with
“Marie Antoinette de France”. It
is possible that the cardinal was
not aware of the custom that
French queens signed with their
given names only, but it is
unlikely, given that he had
previously worked as the French
ambassador to the court of
Vienna and would have been
skilled in diplomatic protocol. It
is more likely that the cardinal
was blinded by de la Motte’s
power of persuasion. He was
brought back down to earth by
the king, furious that a high-
ranking noble could be duped by
such an obvious error. Although
he was lampooned as a fool, he
received popular support; his
acquittal was deemed a victory
over the unpopular royals.
This satirical engraving mocks
Cardinal de Rohan’s gullibility and
crookedness as he offers up the
necklace to de la Motte.
I can see I have been
cruelly deceived.
Cardinal Louis
de Rohan
064-065_AffairofDndNecklace.indd 65 12/12/2016 17:12