The Sociology Book

(Romina) #1

266


W


hen dealing with the
bureaucratic procedures
that typify the modern
world—and the frustrations they
engender—most of us can escape
into our private lives to maintain a
sense of balance. However, there
are people for whom this is not an
option because they spend all their
time in structured institutions,
such as prisons or asylums.
US sociologist Erving Goffman
was interested in how people deal
with things when they cannot
escape everyday rules and
regulations. For his seminal study
Asylums, published in 1961,
he investigated how the “self”
adjusts to living in permanent
and omnipresent bureaucracy. He
contended that the most important
factor for a patient in a mental
hospital was not the illness but the
institution—and that the reactions
and adjustments the affected
person makes are found in inmates
of other types of institution too.

Total institutions
Institutions that are closed off
from the outside world—often
physically by walls, fences, and
locked doors—are what Goffman

calls “total institutions.” Asylums,
prisons and concentration camps,
and even boarding schools and
monasteries, are examples of this
extreme form of organization.
In “total institutions,” not
only are the inmates physically
separated from the outside world,
they are frequently isolated for
extended periods of time,
sometimes involuntarily. Due to
these peculiar circumstances,
such organizations develop
particular ways of going about

ERVING GOFFMAN


“Total institutions” strip
people of their support systems
and their sense of self.

The goal of “total institutions”
is to influence the lives of
individuals comprehensively.

A person’s former identity and
sense of self is broken down...

...and they are forced to adapt
and become adjusted to the
goals of the institution.

IN CONTEXT


FOCUS
Institutionalization

KEY DATES
1871 Henry Maudsley, a
British psychiatrist, argues
that asylums adversely affect
individuals’ sense of self.

1972 Psychological Survival,
Stanley Cohen and Laurie
Taylor’s study of a men’s prison
in Durham, UK, reveals that
inmates adapt behavior and
identity in order to survive.

1975 French thinker Michel
Foucault’s Discipline and
Punish: The Birth of the Prison
considers the ways in which
prisons and asylums maintain
social order and conformity.

1977 In Decarceration, US
sociologist Andrew T. Scull
contends that the trend
to reduce the number of
institutions for the mentally
ill and prisoners leads to a
greater lack of care.

These establishments
are the forcing houses
for changing persons in
our society. Each is a
natural experiment,
typically harsh, on what
can be done to the self.
Erving Goffman
Free download pdf