would
watch
thetwo
men
carefully.
If
he
sawthatthesecondcourtierhad
not
changed
inhisbehaviortowardthe
king,
hewouldconcludethatthe
firstcourtierhad
kept
the
secret,
andhewould
quicklypromote
the
man,
later
taking
himasideto
confess,
“Imeanttokill
your
friendbecauseof
certaininformationthathadreached
me,but,
whenI
investigated
the
mat-
ter,
I
found
it
wasuntrue.”
If,
on
the
other
hand,
thesecondcourtierstarted
toavoidthe
king,acting
aloofand
tense,
Chosroeswouldknowthatthese
crethadbeenrevealed.Hewouldbanthesecondcourtierfromhis
court,
letting
himknowthatthewholebusinesshad
only
beena
test,
butthat
even
though
themanhad
done
nothingwrong,
hecouldno
longer
trust
him.Thefirst
courtier,however,
hadrevealeda
secret,
andhimChosroes
wouldbanfromhisentire
kingdom.
It
may
seemanoddformof
spying
thatrevealsnot
empirical
informa:
tionbuta
person’s
character.
Often,however,
itisthebest
way
of
solving
problems
before
they
arise.
Bytemptingpeople
intocertain
acts,
you
learnabouttheir
loyalty,
their
honesty,
andsoon.Andthiskindof
knowledge
isoftenthemost
valuableofall:Armedwith
it,
you
can
predict
theiractionsinthefuture.
[ma
g
e:
The Third
Eye
of
the
Spy.
In theland of
the
two-eyed,
thethird
eye
gives
you
theomniscience
ofa
god.
Youseefurtherthan
others,
and
you
see
deeper
intothem.
Nobody
is
safefromthe
eye
but
you.
Authority:
Now,
thereasonabrilliant
sovereign
andawise
general
conquer
the
enemy
whenever
they
move,
andtheirachievements
surpass
thoseof
ordinary
men,
istheir
foreknowledge
ofthe
enemy
situation.This
“foreknowledge”
cannotbeelicitedfrom
spirits,
nor
from
gods,
nor
byanalogy
with
past
events,
not
byastrologic
calcu
lations.Itmustbeobtainedfrommenwhoknowthe
enemy
sit-
uati0n—-from
spies.
(Sun-tzu,
TheArt
if
War,
fourth
century
B.C.)
LAW 14 I05