ofoneofthe
greatest
civilizationsofalltime.TheAthenianswereledinto
thisdisaster
by
their
hearts,
nottheirminds.
They
saw
only
thechanceof
glory,
notthe
dangers
thatloomedinthedistance.
Cardinalde
Retz,
the
seventeenth-century
Frenchmanwho
prided
himselfonhis
insights
intohumanschemesand
why
theymostly
fail,
ana-
lyzed
this
phenomenon.
Inthecourse ofarebellion he
spearheaded
against
theFrench
monarchy
in
1651,
the
youngking,
Louis
XIV,
andhis
court
had
suddenly
leftParisandestablishedthemselvesina
palace
out-
sidethe
capital.
The
presence
ofthe
king
soclosetotheheartoftherevo-
lutionhadbeenatremendousburdenonthe
revolutionaries,
and
they
breatheda
sigh
ofrelief.Thislater
proved
their
downfall,
however,
since
thecourt’sabsencefromParis
gave
itmuchmoreroomtomaneuver.
“The
most
ordinary
causeof
people’s
mistakes,”
CardinaldeRetzlater
wrote,
“istheir
being
toomuch
frightened
at
the
presentdanger,
andnot
enough
soatthatwhichisremote.”
The
dangers
thatare
remote,
thatloominthedistance-—ifwecansee
themas
they
take
shape,
how
many
mistakesweavoid.How
manyplans
wewould
instantly
abortifwerealizedwewere
avoiding
asmall
danger
only
to
step
into
a
larger
one.Somuchof
power
is
notwhat
you
do
but
what
you
donotdo——therashandfoolishactionsthat
you
refrainfrombe-
fore
theygetyou
intotrouble.Planindetailbefore
you
act—donotlet
vagueplans
lead
you
into trouble.Will thishave unintendedconse-
quences?
WillI
stir
up
new
enemies?
Will
someone
elsetake
advantage
of
my
labors?
Unhappy
endings
are muchmore common than
happy
ones——donotbe
swayedby
the
happyending
in
your
mind.
TheFrenchelectionsof 1848 camedowntoa
struggle
betweenLouis-
Adolphe
Thiers,
themanof
order,
andGeneralLouis
Eugene
Cavaignac,
therabble-rouserofthe
right
WhenThiersrealizedhewas
hopelessly
be-
hindinthis
high—stakes
race,
hesearched
desperately
fora
solution.
His
eye
fellonLouis
Bonaparte,grand-nephew
ofthe
greatgeneral
Napoleon,
anda
lowly
deputy
inthe
parliament.
This
Bonaparte
seemedabitofan
imbecile,
buthisnamealonecould
get
himelectedina
countryyearning
fora
strong
ruler.HewouldbeThiers’s
puppet
and
eventually
wouldbe
pushedoffstage.
Thefirst
part
of
the
plan
worked to
perfection,
and
Napoleon
waselected
by
a
largemargin.
The
problem
wasthatThiers
hadnotforeseenone
simple
fact:This“imbecile”wasinfactamanof
enormousambition.Three
years
laterhedissolved
parliament,
declared
himself
emperor,
andruledFranceforanother
eighteenyears,
muchto
thehorrorofThiersand
his
party.
The
ending
is
everything.
Itistheendof
the
action
that
determines
who
gets
the
glory,
the
money,
the
prize.
Yourconclusionmustbe
crystal
clear,
and
you
must
keep
it
constantly
inmind.Youmustalso
figure
out
howtowardoffthevultures
circling
overhead,
trying
toliveoffthecar-
cassof
your
creation.And
you
must
anticipate
the
manypossible
crises
thatwill
tempt
you
to
improvise.
Bismarckovercamethese
dangers
be-
causehe
planned
tothe
end,
kept
oncourse
throughevery
crisis,
and