velop
thetheory
behindthiskindofwarfare,
andto
putitintopractice.
Hisideasinfluenced
Mao,
whofoundinhis
writings
an
uncannyWesternequivalent
towei-chi.Lawrencewasworking
withArabsfighting
fortheirterritoryagainst
theTurks.HisideawastomaketheArabsblendintothevast
desert,
neverproviding
a
target,nevercollectingtogether
inoneplace.
AstheTurksscrambledto
fight
thisvaporousarmy,theyspread
them-selves
thin,
wasfingenergy
in
movingfromplace
toplace.
They
hadthesu-periorfirepower
but theArabskept
theinifiativebyplaying
catandmouse,
giving
theTurksnothing
toholdon
to,destroying
theirmorale.“Mostwarswerewarsofcontact.
...
Ours
shouldbeawarof
detachment,”
Lawrencewrote.“Weweretocontainthe
enemyby
thesilentthreatofavastunknown
desert,
notdisclosing
ourselvestillweattacked.”Thisistheultimateformofstrategy.
Thewarof
engagementhashe-comefartoo
dangerous
andcostly;
indirectionandelusivenessyield
farbetterresults
ata
muchlower
cost.Themain
cost,
infact,
ismental-—thethinking
ittakestoalignyour
forcesinscattered
patiems,andtounder-minethemindsand
psychology
of
youropponents.Andnothing
willinfu-riateanddisoxientthemmorethanformlessness.Inaworldwherewarsof
detachmentarethe
order
ofthe
day,
formlessnessiscrucial.The
firstpsychologicalrequirement
offormlessnessistotrainyourself
totake
nothingpersonally.
Nevershow
anydefensiveness.When
youactdefensive,
youshowyouremotions,revealing
aclearform.Your
oppo-nentswillrealize
they
havehita
nerve,anAchilles’heel.Andthey
willhitit
again
andagain.
So
trainyourself
totakenothingpersonally.
Never
letanyonegetyour
back
up.Belikeaslippery
ballthatcannotbeheld:Letnooneknowwhat
gets
to
you,orwhere
yourweaknesseslie.Make
yourfaceaformlessmaskand
youwillinfuriateanddisorient
yourscheming
col-leagues
and
opponents.One
manwhousedthistechnique
wasBaronJames
Rothschild.AGermanJew
inParis,
inaculturedecidedlyunfriendly
toforeigners,
Roth-schildnevertook
anyattackonhimpersonally
orshowedhehadbeenhurtin
anyway.
Hefurthermoreadapted
himselftothe
political
climate,whateveritwa.s«——-the
stiffly
formalRestorationmonarchy
ofLouis
XVIII,thebourgeoisreign
ofLouis-Philippe,
thedemocraticrevolutionof
1848,the
upstartLouis-Napoleon
crowned
emperorin- Rothschildac-
cepted
themoneandall,
andblendedin.Hecouldaffordto
appearhypo-
criticaloropportunistic
becausehewasvaluedforhis
money,nothispolitics;
his
moneywasthe
currencyof
power.Whileheadapted
andthrived,outwardly
nevershowing
a
form,alltheother
greatfamiliesthathadbegun
thecenturyimmenselywealthy
weremined
in
theperiod’s
complicated
shiftsandturnsoffortune.Attaching
themselvestothepast,
they
revealedtheirembraceofaform.Throughouthistory,
theformlessstyle
ofruling
hasbeenmostadeptly
practicedby
the
queenwhoreigns
alone.
A
queenisinaradically
diflerentpositionfroma.king;
becausesheisa
woman,
hersubjects
andcourtiersarelikely
todoubtherability
to
rule,herstrength
ofcharacter.Ifshefavors