velop
the
theory
behindthiskindof
warfare,
andto
put
itinto
practice.
His
ideasinfluenced
Mao,
whofoundinhis
writings
an
uncanny
Western
equivalent
towei-chi.Lawrencewas
working
withArabs
fighting
fortheir
territoryagainst
theTurks.HisideawastomaketheArabsblendintothe
vast
desert,
never
providing
a
target,
never
collectingtogether
inone
place.
AstheTurksscrambledto
fight
this
vaporousarmy,theyspread
them-
selves
thin,
wasfingenergy
in
moving
from
place
to
place.
They
hadthesu-
periorfirepower
but theArabs
kept
theinifiative
byplaying
catand
mouse,
giving
theTurks
nothing
toholdon
to,
destroying
theirmorale.
“Mostwarswerewarsofcontact.
...
Ours
shouldbeawarof
detachment,”
Lawrencewrote.“Weweretocontainthe
enemyby
thesilentthreatofa
vastunknown
desert,
not
disclosing
ourselvestillweattacked.”
Thisistheultimateformof
strategy.
Thewarof
engagement
hashe-
comefartoo
dangerous
and
costly;
indirectionandelusiveness
yield
far
betterresults
ata
muchlower
cost.Themain
cost,
in
fact,
ismental-—the
thinking
ittakesto
alignyour
forcesinscattered
patiems,
andtounder-
minethemindsand
psychology
of
youropponents.
And
nothing
willinfu-
riateanddisoxientthemmorethanformlessness.Inaworldwherewarsof
detachmentarethe
order
ofthe
day,
formlessnessiscrucial.
The
first
psychologicalrequirement
offormlessnessistotrain
yourself
totake
nothingpersonally.
Nevershow
any
defensiveness.When
you
act
defensive,
you
show
youremotions,revealing
aclearform.Your
oppo-
nentswillrealize
they
havehita
nerve,
anAchilles’heel.And
they
willhit
it
again
and
again.
So
train
yourself
totake
nothingpersonally.
Never
let
anyonegetyour
back
up.
Belikea
slippery
ballthatcannotbeheld:Letno
oneknowwhat
gets
to
you,
orwhere
your
weaknesseslie.Make
your
face
aformlessmaskand
you
willinfuriateanddisorient
your
scheming
col-
leagues
and
opponents.
One
manwhousedthis
technique
wasBaron
James
Rothschild.A
German
Jew
in
Paris,
inaculture
decidedlyunfriendly
to
foreigners,
Roth-
schildnevertook
any
attackonhim
personally
orshowedhehadbeen
hurtin
anyway.
Hefurthermore
adapted
himselftothe
political
climate,
whateveritwa.s«——-the
stiffly
formalRestoration
monarchy
ofLouis
XVIII,
the
bourgeoisreign
of
Louis-Philippe,
thedemocraticrevolutionof
1848,
the
upstart
Louis-Napoleon
crowned
emperor
in
- Rothschildac-
cepted
themoneand
all,
andblendedin.Hecouldaffordto
appear
hypo-
criticalor
opportunistic
becausehewasvaluedforhis
money,
nothis
politics;
his
money
wasthe
currency
of
power.
Whilehe
adapted
and
thrived,
outwardly
never
showing
a
form,
alltheother
great
familiesthat
had
begun
the
centuryimmenselywealthy
weremined
in
the
period’s
complicated
shiftsandturnsoffortune.
Attaching
themselvestothe
past,
they
revealedtheirembraceofaform.
Throughouthistory,
theformless
style
of
ruling
hasbeenmost
adeptly
practicedby
the
queen
who
reigns
alone.
A
queen
isina
radically
diflerent
position
froma.
king;
becausesheisa
woman,
her
subjects
andcourtiers
are
likely
todoubther
ability
to
rule,
her
strength
ofcharacter.Ifshefavors