himin
rapt
silence.
Hestartedslowly
andsoftly,
butasthespeech
went
on,hebecamemoreandmoreblunt.Yet
again
he
hurledinsults!Histonewasarrogant,
hisexpression
disdainful.Themorehespoke,
the
angtierthepeople
became.Finallythey
shoutedhimdownandsilencedhim.Thetribunes
conferred,
condemned
Coriolanus
todeath,
andorderedthe
magistrates
totakehimatoncetothe
topoftheTitrpeian
rockandthrowhimover.The
delighted
crowdsecondedthedecision.Thepatri-
cians,however,
managed
to
intervene,
andthesentencewascommutedtoa
lifelong
banishment.Whenthepeople
foundoutthatRome’s
greatmili-tary
hero
wouldneverretumtothecity,they
celebratedinthe
streets.Infact
noonehad
everseenweba
celebration,
notevenafterthedefeatofa
foreignenemy.
Interpretation
Beforehisentranceintopolitics,
thenameofCoriolanusevokedawe.Hisbattlefieldaccomplishments
showedhimasamanof
greatbrav-ery.Sincethecitizensknewlittleabout
him,
allkindsoflegends
becameat-tachedtohisname.Themomentheappeared
beforetheRoman
citizens,however,
andspoke
his
mind,
allthatgrandeur
and
mysteryvanished.Hebragged
andblusteredlikea
common
soldier.He
insulted
and
slanderedpeople,
asifhefeltthreatenedand
insecure.Suddenly
he
wasnotat
allwhat
thepeople
hadimagined.
Thediscrepancy
betweenthelegend
andtherealityprovedimmenselydisappointing
tothosewhowantedtobelieveintheirhero.ThemoreCoriolanussaid,
thelesspowerful
he
ap-peared——-aperson
whocannotcontrolhiswordsshowsthathecannotcontrol
himself,
andisunworthy
of
respect.HadCoriolanussaid
less,
thepeople
wouldneverhavehadcausetobeoffendedby
him,
wouldneverhaveknownhistruefeelings.
Hewouldhavemaintainedhispowerful
aura,wouldcertainly
have
been
elected
con’sul,
andwouldhavebeenabletoaccomplish
his
antidemocraticgoals.
Butthehuman
tongueisabeastthat
fewcan
master.It
strainsconstantly
tobreakoutofits
cage,andifitisnot
tamed,
itwillrunwildandcause
yougrief.
Powercannotaccruetothosewhosquander
theirtreasureofwords.(lystersopencompletely
whenthemoonis
full;andwhenthecrabseesoneitthrows
a
pieceofstoneorseaweedintoitandthe
IIy.§’lR‘Vcannotcloseagain
sothatitservesthecrab
formmt.Suchis
the’fateofhimwho
openshismouthtoomuchandtherebyputshimself
atthe
mercy
ofthelistener.I,Hmtz.2“(.ir9{Ia
Vina,
1452-£519OBSERVANCEOFTHELAWInthecourtofLouis
XIV,
noblesandministerswouldspenddays
andnightsdebating
issuesofstate.They
would
confer,
argue,makeandbreakalliances,
andargueagain,
untilfinally
thecriticalmomentarrived:Twoofthemwouldbechosento
representthedifferentsidestoLouis
himself,whowoulddecidewhatshouldbedone.Afterthese
personswerechosen,
questionfromKissinger——
[nrdsnapped.
“Damnii.
yesitsrimbarIcando."
Towhich
Ki.\‘SlIlg¢','freplied:“Fina
thanIguessI'llreaditthisnrmr."
KISSINGER,
\\«’m:rF,R
ls,-1/tC$0N,1992The
King,‘1.nm'5XIV]maintainsthemar!impenetrablexecrreryabout
affairsofSalli’.Therninirlcrsutlemlcmmcil
nieclmgs,
buthe
confides
his
plans
to.'hem
onlywhenhehasreflertiz/ti
at
lengthuprmthem
andhas
cometoa
zlefinizcdcnsimi,Iwith
youmightseethe
King.
Hir
BXpN.’.)'“.\‘ionis
inscmIaI.wle>;I1i.\'e_ve5'
likelhosc
ofa
fm-.Heneverdz'scus.s‘e.$
Slate
affairsexcept
withhI'.s-rliinisfersin(‘mm-
cil.W/muhe
speakstocourtiershe
refers
onlytotheir
respectiveprzerogazives
ordz¢Ii.2y.
Eventhemost
friw.»lous
ofhir
utI€n‘1rl(‘€.s‘hastheair
ofheirzgthemanozmcemenlofananurle.YRIM‘.VlS(‘,()NTl.<>I.'m1=,n
INLouisxiv.Lot.is r«:Ri'i{A:~£r).1928LAW 4 3:3’