’l'llK
‘5r'§H§K\Ul’AMKSIS
\-‘Vhrn
Aprzer
hadbeen
dcpmred
inthe
way
I
have
described,
/inmrm
minetothethrone.He
Lrelorxgerl
tothedi.xrm:t
of
Sui:andwas 41
nativr
of
thetown
called
Siuph
At
first
the
lfgypzians
wem
inclinedtobe
contemp-
tuour,
anddidnot
thinkmuch
ofhim
hccuuse
of
hishumble
and
lmdirtinguislzed
origin,‘
butlateronhe
cleverlybrought
them
toheel.wizhout
having
I'(’(:t)urSc‘soharsh
rrzeaxures.
Amongst
hisz'zmrmwr-
able
treamrer.
hehm!1!
goldfoothath,
Whi(‘hhe
andhis
guests
usedon
m,-:,'a.s‘i()rztowmhtheir
feet
tn.Thishr’broke
up,
andwiththemate-
rialhad
astatus‘nuzrlze
toone
of
the
gods.
\v}z1chhethenre:
up
in
whathe
thought
the
mostsuimble
spot
in
the
cil‘_v.
The
Egywiarzr
('uIz.9‘lantl}?cmnmg
upon
the
statue.
Irzatm’
itwith
profototd
rever-
Price,
andassoonas
Amu.s‘t'.s‘heard
offhe
effect
(I
had
upon
them,
heCaller!at
meeting
and
rcvealmlthe
fun
that
the
deeply
rwetrcul
.rmtu,ewas07:01’a
fool-
bulh.which
zlwy
washer!their
few
and
pixxezl
andvamitcdin.
Hewmronto
say
that
/itsowncarewas
much
the
sami’,
inthatonce
hehadbeen
only
an
nnlinuryperson
and
wasnowtheir
l<:'ng;.vo
tlml
jets!
as
Ihey
Izod
cometorevereHm
IftlI1.S'f:)rmZ£§f0€)!b£l(l1,
so
{hay
hmiboiler
pay
72 LAW 9
Interpretation
Michelangelo
knewthat
bychanging
the
shape
ofthenosehe
might
ruin
theentire
sculpture.
YetSoderiniwasa
patron
who
prided
himselfonhis
aesthetic
judgment.
Tooffendsuchaman
byarguing
wouldnot
onlygain
Michelangelo nothing,
it would
put
future
commissions in
jeopardy.
Michelangelo
was
too clever
to
argue.
His solution
was to
change
Soden‘m"s
perspective(literallybringing
himclosertothe
nose)
without
making
himrealizethatthiswasthecauseofhis
misperception.
Fortunately
for
posterity,Michelangelo
found
a
way
to
keep
the
per
faction
ofthestatue
intactwhileatthesame
time
making
Soderinibelieve
hehad
improved
it.Suchisthedouble
power
of
winningthrough
actions
rather
than
argument:
Nooneis
offended,
and
yourpoint
is
proven.
KEYST0POWER
Intherealmof
poweryou
mustlearn
to
judgeyour
moves
by
their
long»
term
effectsonother
people.
The
problem
in
trying
to
prove
a
point
or
gain
a.
victorythroughargument
isthatintheend
you
canneverbecertain
howitaffectsthe
peopleyou’rearguing
with:
Theymayappear
to
agree
with
youpolitely,
butinside
theymay
resent
you.
Or
perhapssomething
you
said
inadvertently
evenoffendedthern—-wordshavethatinsidious
ability
tobe
interpretedaccording
totheother
person’s
moodandinsecuri-
ties.Eventhebest
argument
hasnosolid
foundation,
forwehaveallcome
todistrustthe
slippery
natureofwords.And
days
after
agreeing
withsome
one,
weofienreverttoourold
opinion
outofsheerhabit.
Understandthis:Wordsare
a
dime
a
dozen.
Everyone
knows
thatin
theheatofan
argument,
wewillall
say
anything
to
support
ourcause.We
will
quote
the
Bible,
refertounverifiablestatistics.Whocanbe
persuaded
bybags
ofairlikethat?Actionanddemonstrationaremuchmore
power-
fuland
meaningful.They
are
there,
beforeour
eyes,
forusto
see-——“Yes,
nowthe
statue’snosedoeslook
justright.”
Therearenooffensive
words,
no
possibility
of
misinterpretation.
Noonecan
argue
withademonstrated
proof.
AsBaltasarGraciim
remarks,
“Themidiis
generally
seen,
rarely
heard.”
Sir
Christopher
Wrenwas
England’s
versionoftheRenaissanceman.
He
hadmasteredthesciencesof
mathematics,
astronomy,physics,
and
physiology.
Yet
during
his
extremelylong
careeras
England’s
mostCele‘
bratedarchitecthewas oftentold
by
his
patrons
tomake
impractical
changes
inhis
designs.
Neveroncedidhe
argue
or
offend.Hehadother
ways
of
proving
his
point.
In 1688 Wren
designed
a
magnificent
townhallforthe
city
ofWest-
minster.The
mayor,
however.
wasnot
satisfied;
infacthewasnervous.He
toldWrenhewasafraidthesecond{floorwasnot
secure,
andthatitcould
all
come
crashing
downonhisofficeonthefirst
floor.Hedemandedthat
Wrenaddtwostonecolumnsforextra
support.
Wren,
theconsummateen-
gineer,
knewthatthesecolumnswouldserveno
purpose,
and thatthe