Introduction to Corporate Finance

(Tina Meador) #1

ONLINE CHAPTERS


usage and the timing of receipt from suppliers. Assuming a constant rate of usage, a company can easily
estimate a reorder point as follows:

Reorder point = Lead time in days × Daily usage


For example, if Auchenflower Producers uses about 44 units per day (16,000 units per year ÷ 365
days), and if it typically takes the company four days to place and receive an order, then the company
should place an order when its inventory falls to 176 units (four days × 44 units).
To allow for faster-than-anticipated rates of usage and/or delayed deliveries, many companies maintain
safety stocks of inventory. Management determines the size of these stocks by analysing the probabilities
of both increased usage rates and delivery delays. For example, Auchenflower Producers estimates that
a safety stock equal to 2% of its annual usage of the given item will adequately protect against stockouts
due to faster-than-anticipated usage and/or order fulfilment delays. Given that estimate, Auchenflower
will maintain a safety stock of 320 units (0.02 × 16,000 units). A variety of more sophisticated models
are available for setting both reorder points and safety stocks.

finance in practice

SHOULD I BUY IN LARGE QUANTITIES?


The proliferation of superstores and warehouse
clubs causes many individuals and families to buy
large quantities of staple items such as paper
goods, canned food and soft drinks in order to
try to save money. The question is: does buying
in large quantities make sense? This question can
be answered by considering the cost trade-offs
involved, similar to the basic EOQ model.
Let’s assume that the local GoLo offers a box
of 200 garbage bags for $12. You currently buy a
box of 50 similar garbage bags for $6 at the nearby
grocery store every three months (¼ of a year), so
the 200 bags should last you an entire year. Because
you routinely go to both the local grocery shop and
to GoLo, your ‘order costs’, which would be the
transportation costs and the value of your time, are
virtually $0. You won’t have to make a special trip to
either shop. Assuming you have adequate storage
space at home, your holding costs are strictly
financial, and represent the cost of having your
money tied up in garbage bags. Let’s assume you

can earn 4% interest on your savings. Your average
investment in each case would be one-half of the
cost of the purchase as calculated below:

Average investment
GoLo purchase = $12/2 = $6
Nearby grocery shop purchase = $6/2 = $3

The GoLo purchase would therefore cause you
to have, on average, an extra $3 ($6 – $3) invested
in garbage bags. Given that you can earn 4%
on your money, the annual cost of tying up $3 in
garbage bags is $0.12 (0.04 × $3). But by buying
the large quantity of garbage bags at GoLo, you
save $12, the difference between $24 (four $6
purchases at the nearby grocery shop) and the $12
cost of the one-time purchase at GoLo. So does it
make economic sense to incur annual holding costs
of $0.12 to save $12 annually? Clearly, in this case,
the large quantity purchase will save just under $12
per year.
Free download pdf