A4| Friday, March 6, 2020 PWLC101112HTGKRFAM123456789OIXX ***** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
WASHINGTON—Former
Vice President Joe Biden
would raise taxes by $4 tril-
lion over a decade, concentrat-
ing those higher levies on top
earners, according to a study
of his tax proposals.
Mr. Biden, the front-runner
for the Democratic presidential
nomination, would increase
federal taxes by about 8% as a
whole, but the effects would
vary sharply by income group,
according to the analysis re-
leased on Thursday by the Tax
Policy Center, a Washington re-
search group run by a former
Obama administration official.
The top 1% of households
would pay 74% of the addi-
tional taxes and they would
see their after-tax income
drop by 17% in 2021. That
would be an average tax in-
crease of nearly $300,000.
Middle-income households
would see tax increases aver-
aging $260 in 2021, mostly be-
cause of the indirect effects of
corporate tax increases. That
would be less than 0.5% of af-
ter-tax income.
A Biden economic adviser
said the candidate was com-
mitted to not raising taxes on
the middle class and ques-
tioned how much effect corpo-
rate taxes have on workers.
The Biden tax plan, rolled
out piecemeal throughout his
campaign, is significantly
smaller than the one offered
by his rival for the Democratic
nomination, Sen. Bernie Sand-
ers of Vermont. It would still
mark a reversal of many of the
tax cuts that President Trump
signed in 2017 and includes
proposals that the Obama ad-
ministration could never get
through Congress.
Mr. Biden would raise the
top individual tax rate to
39.6% from 37% and limit de-
ductions for people earning
over $400,000.
People would have to pay
income taxes on unrealized
gains at death. That would
change current law, which ex-
empts those gains and im-
poses taxes only on the differ-
ence between the value at
death and the value when later
sold by heirs.
Capital gains would be
taxed at the same rates as or-
dinary income for taxpayers
with incomes above $1 million.
Social Security taxes would ap-
ply to wages and self-employ-
ment income over $400,000,
rather than being capped at
$137,700 as they are this year.
The corporate tax rate
would rise to 28% from 21%.
Companies would also face a
minimum tax of 15% on their
global profit on financial state-
ments as well as higher taxes
on their foreign earnings.
The Biden plan includes
some targeted tax cuts, includ-
ing some to encourage retire-
ment savings and purchases of
electric vehicles. The Biden plan
doesn’t include some staples of
other Democratic tax proposals,
such as higher estate taxes,
higher payroll taxes to pay for
family leave programs and ex-
pansions of the child tax credit
for low-income households.
The estimates assume that
individual tax cuts would lapse
as scheduled at the end of 2025,
which would mean tax increases
for most households. Democrats
haven’t taken a firm position on
what to do then, but most gen-
erally say they don’t want to
raise taxes on middle-income
households. Preventing that tax
increase would lower the $
trillion estimate, likely by sev-
eral hundred billion dollars.
The center hasn’t released
full estimates of the Sanders
tax plan, which calls for higher
corporate taxes than those in
Mr. Biden’s plan and proposes
an annual wealth tax.
BYRICHARDRUBIN
Biden Tax
Proposal
Would Hit
To p 1%
Change in after-tax income in
2021 under Biden's tax plan
Source: Tax Policy Center
–20% –10 0
Lowest quintile
Second quintile
Middle quintile
Fourth quintile
Top quintile
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
showing support for the for-
mer New York City mayor fall-
ing in several key states after
his disastrous debate perfor-
mance in Las Vegas.
The pre-Super Tuesday
gathering illustrated what
some veteran staffers de-
scribed as the Bloomberg bub-
ble—a uniquely extravagant
experience unlike any other
presidential campaign they
have worked on, according to
more than a half-dozen staff-
ers who worked for the billion-
aire candidate. They described
their time on the campaign as
more in line with the opera-
tions of a major tech company
in Silicon Valley than a typical,
scrappy presidential campaign.
“This definitely was a once-
in-a-lifetime opportunity,” one
staffer said.
Overall, Mr. Bloomberg
spent at least $620 million of
his own money in just three
months of his presidential
campaign. He dropped out
Wednesday after an unsuc-
cessful Super Tuesday and en-
dorsed former Vice President
Joe Biden, ending the “100-
day wild ride,” as some of his
staffers joked.
The ride could continue for
a few hundred of those staff-
ers. Mr. Bloomberg committed
last year to keeping offices
open and staff employed in
competitive states that Presi-
dent Trump won in 2016 until
Election Day. His advisers are
still figuring out how to con-
vert his existing infrastruc-
ture into an outside operation
that can either boost Mr. Bi-
den or stay focused on oppos-
ing Mr. Trump.
Staffers have been told
they will stay on the payroll
through the end of the month,
and those in swing states are
waiting to hear if their em-
ployment will be extended be-
yond that.
For campaign veterans ac-
customed to tight budgets and
constant fundraising strug-
gles, being in the Bloomberg
bubble meant entirely chang-
ing their mind-set and essen-
tially removing money as a
factor in any decision-making.
It also meant significantly
higher salaries, relocation sti-
pends, three catered meals a
day, corporate housing in New
York City, new MacBooks and
iPhones, and fancier hotels for
those on the road with rooms
they didn’t have to share,
among other luxuries they are
unlikely to get on any other
campaign, according to the
staffers and Federal Election
Commission reports.
And all of that was possible
without a campaign schedule
that revolved around blocking
off time for the candidate to
make calls to major donors or
to travel to wealthy enclaves
for fundraising.
Several staffers said there
were many moments—some-
times in a single day—when
they were stunned by the ease
with which decisions could be
made and problems solved
when money didn’t matter.
In certain cases, however,
the lack of constraints made
prioritizing what the cam-
paign needed to do in a short
period harder, some said.
Mr. Bloomberg’s massive
operation, which included
more than 2,400 staffers
across the country, brought in
top talent—those who worked
for Barack Obama and Hillary
Clinton and who served on
campaigns that were sus-
pended last year.
The level of emotional in-
vestment in the Bloomberg
campaign varied widely, staff-
ers said. Many were drawn by
the high salaries and overall
convenience, viewing it as
purely business.
Some staffers said they
saw Mr. Bloomberg as a Dem-
ocratic candidate who could
defeat Mr. Trump, especially
when Mr. Biden was faltering.
But with Mr. Biden now on
the rise and moderates and
black voters coalescing
around him, the staffers said
they no longer felt as invested
in the campaign and were sat-
isfied with Mr. Bloomberg’s
decision to drop out.
In an emotional speech
Wednesday afternoon, Mr.
Bloomberg thanked his staff-
ers, his voice cracking at
times. “I know you didn’t do it
for me,” he said. “You did it
for your country, for America.
And you did it because you
love America as much as I do,
and that’s all I could ever ask
for.”
After the speech, the cam-
paign staffers returned to the
Hard Rock Cafe for one more
celebration. Mr. Bloomberg’s
campaign picked up the tab
again.
About a week before Super
Tuesday, Michael Bloomberg’s
campaign staffers gathered at
the Hard Rock Cafe at Times
Square—around the corner
from their Manhattan head-
quarters—to celebrate.
Mr. Bloomberg had yet to
appear on a ballot, but his ad-
visers wanted to thank staffers
for their work three months
into the campaign and to get
them energized for the con-
tests ahead.
As Mr. Bloomberg’s cam-
paign manager, Kevin Sheekey,
rallied the team with a pep
talk and an open bar and food,
internal data were already
BYTARINIPARTI
Bloomberg Staffers Say Campaign Unlike Others
Mr. Bloomberg acknowledged
campaign staffers in a New
York City hotel ballroom after
ending his bid for president.
JUSTIN LANE/EPA/SHUTTERSTOCK
U.S. NEWS
half gravitated to moderate
candidates such as Mr. Biden,
Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minne-
sota and Pete Buttigieg, the
former mayor of South Bend,
Ind. Both have since endorsed
Mr. Biden. A Reuters/Ipsos
poll Thursday found Warren
supporters split between Mr.
Biden and Mr. Sanders.
Exit polls in several Super
Tuesday states showed Ms.
Warren saw her strongest per-
formance among white college
graduates. Mr. Biden also car-
ried that group in Texas and
Virginia, both of which he
won. Mr. Sanders led that co-
hort in California and Colo-
rado, each states won by the
Vermont senator.
Asked what her supporters
should do now, Ms. Warren
said: “Well, let’s take a deep
breath and spend a little time
on that. We don’t have to de-
cide right this minute.”
Both Messrs. Biden and
Sanders have called Ms. War-
ren over the past two days,
but neither has described
those conversations in detail.
Speaking to reporters
Thursday in Burlington, Vt.,
Mr. Sanders said he would
love to have Ms. Warren’s sup-
port but was focused on
reaching out to her millions of
supporters “to tell them that,
you know, while Senator War-
ren and I had nuances of dif-
ferences—we did—that there
is no question her agenda she
fought for...is a lot closer to
what I am fighting for then
what Joe Biden” is advocating.
Messrs. Sanders and Biden
will face off virtually alone—
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii
is still in the race but had only
one delegate as of Thursday
afternoon—for the first time
in six states on Tuesday. Mr.
Sanders canceled a planned
event in Mississippi Friday so
he could spend more time in
Michigan, a state he won in
his 2016 campaign and where
he hopes to show strength in
the Midwest to counter Mr. Bi-
den’s wins in the South.
Mr. Sanders said Thursday
that Michigan wasn’t a must-
win, however, and that skip-
ping Mississippi shouldn’t
send a negative message to
black voters.
“We’re very proud of the
fact that we have strong sup-
port for the African-American
community, that we are going
to be working with the Afri-
can-American community, the
Muslim community in Michi-
gan and in every state in the
country,“ he said. “I cannot be
in every place at the same
time.”
Mr. Sanders’s backers have
signaled that he would need to
consolidate Ms. Warren’s side
of the progressive base behind
him to compete with Mr. Bi-
den’s emerging coalition of
black Democrats, older voters
and suburbanites.
Max Berger, one of Ms.
Warren’s aides, wrote on Twit-
ter after she dropped out of
the race: “If Bernie Sanders is
going to be the Democratic
nominee for president, he’s
going to need to convince lots
of people who don’t already
agree with him to trust his
leadership.”
—Ken Thomas in
Washington and Eliza Collins
in Burlington, Vt.,
contributed to this article.
WASHINGTON—Elizabeth
Warren’s departure from the
Democratic presidential con-
test left Joe Biden and Bernie
Sanders competing to win
over her largely college-edu-
cated base of support ahead of
a series of primaries over the
next month.
Public surveys indicate Ms.
Warren’s supporters, who
boosted the Massachusetts
senator in national polls but
left her without wins in early-
voting states, could splinter
between Messrs. Biden and
Sanders.
Ms. Warren’s support could
be a boon to each candidate.
Mr. Biden is looking to demon-
strate that he can unite the
Democratic Party after landing
endorsements from several
other ex-rivals and winning a
spate of large, racially diverse
states on Super Tuesday. Mr.
Sanders, meanwhile, hopes to
align progressives to support
him and oppose the former
vice president, around whom
moderates have rapidly rallied.
Speaking to reporters out-
side her Cambridge, Mass.,
home Thursday, Ms. Warren
said she miscalculated how
much room there was in the
party for someone like herself.
She said she felt she was ideo-
logically between Mr. Biden on
the center and Mr. Sanders on
the left.
“I was told at the beginning
of this whole undertaking that
there are two lanes—a pro-
gressive lane that Bernie
Sanders is the incumbent for
and a moderate lane that Joe
Biden is the incumbent for—
and there’s no room for any-
one else in this,” Ms. Warren
said. “I thought that wasn’t
right, but evidently I was
wrong.”
In WSJ/NBC News polling
this year, half of Ms. Warren’s
supporters said their second
choice was Mr. Sanders, with
whom she aligned most
closely on policies such as
Medicare for All. The other
BYJOSHUAJAMERSON
Warren Backers Sought by Rivals
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, with her husband outside their home in Cambridge, Mass., announced the suspension of her campaign Thursday.
AMANDA SABGA/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
tive about the Mueller Re-
port—a narrative that is clearly
in some respects substantively
at odds with the redacted ver-
sion of the Mueller Report.”
Judge Walton, who was ap-
pointed by Republican Presi-
dent George W. Bush, said he
would review the full Mueller
report, including the material
not publicly released, to give
Americans confidence that the
Justice Department’s redac-
tions were made for good
cause.
The decision opens the
door to additional parts of the
Mueller report being unre-
dacted and made public.
The Justice Department
didn’t immediately respond to
a request for comment.
The department has previ-
ously defended its handling of
the release of the report, say-
ing it contained substantial
amounts of information that
required redaction.
The judge’s ruling came in a
Freedom of Information Act
case brought by BuzzFeed
journalist Jason Leopold and
the Electronic Privacy Infor-
mation Center, a group that
advocates on civil liberties and
privacy issues.
WASHINGTON—A federal
judge accused Attorney General
William Barr of a lack of can-
dor and questioned his credi-
bility in his handling of the re-
lease of special counsel Robert
Mueller’s report last year.
Judge Reggie Walton of the
U.S. District Court for the Dis-
trict of Columbia said in a rul-
ing there may be reason to be-
lieve that Mr. Barr, in
summarizing the report weeks
before a redacted version was
released to the public, intended
“to create a one-sided narra-
BYBYRONTAU
RATES VALID THROUGH Judge Cites Barr Over Report
APRIL 30, 2020