Financial Times Europe - 06.03.2020

(nextflipdebug2) #1
4 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES Friday6 March 2020

in battleground states. Voluminous
polling commissioned by the data-
obsessed candidate suggested there was
a path to victory.
In fact, Mr Bloomberg had been cir-
cling the contest far longer. In the 2018
midterm elections, he contributed more
than $100m to moderate Democratic
candidates, helping the party to reclaim
the House of Representatives. Those
contributions prompted speculation
that he wasbuilding up a bank of
favours he might later draw on.
Then, in March 2019, Mr Bloomberg
issued an anguished statement ruling
out a run. His explanation was that his
candidacy would further crowd the
party’s centreground and so risk elevat-
ing its populist leftwing.
By the time he finally declared, his
competitors had spent months n thei
early voting states of Iowa and New
Hampshire following a traditional play-
book: earn a strong showing topropel
their campaigns toward the next races.
nstead, Mr Bloomberg bet all hisI
chips on the 14 states and one territory
(American Samoa) that went to the
polls on Tuesday. Drawing on his $58bn
fortune he was able to guarantee six-

figure salaries and housing allowances
to staff and open 200 campaign offices.
Andrew Yang, the former Democratic
candidate, described the Bloomberg
campaign’s Times Square headquarters
as looking “like a spaceship”.
Inlittle more than two months, the
campaign splashed more than $300m
on slick television, radio and internet
advertisements. “They put the money
to good use,” one campaign strategist
judged. “They did a good job of intro-
ducing this moderate, pragmatic tech-
nocrat to the rest of the country.”
In spite of the debate debacle, Mr
Bloomberg still managed to finish third
in many contests on Tuesday, jumping
ahead of Ms Warren.
To Bloomberg advisers, the late break
for Mr Biden validated their view of the
race all along: Democratic voters, they
argued, had an existential fear of Mr
Trump’s re-election and so were seeking
the best option to defeat him. “They
aren’t looking for ideological perfec-
tion,” Stu Loeser, a Bloomberg spokes-
man, explained.
When Mr Biden stumbled, those peo-
ple gravitated to Mr Bloomberg. When
Mr Biden re-emergedover the weekend,
they returned.
If, as Mr Bloomberg has insisted for
months, his overriding goal is to defeat
Mr Trump, that outcome should be
acceptable. In his concession, he offered
generous praise for Mr Biden, promising
to work for his election.
Still, the defeat hurt, even for a bil-
lionaire who is not known to dwell on
setbacks. One member of the Bloomb-
erg inner circle repeatedly mentioned
the need to “heal”.
Mr Bloomberg’s opponents, particu-
larly Ms Warren, managed to reduce
what is regarded by many as one of New
York City’s better mayorships to “stop
and frisk”.Similarly, what was arguably
Mr Bloomberg’s greatest achievement —
building from scratch a financial infor-
mation service that has become the cen-
tral nervous system of Wall Street —
came to be tarnished by claims that he
treated women employees poorly.
“This is one of the extraordinary peo-
ple of our lifetimes!” one longtime aide
lamented. “Somehow that got lost.”

J O S H UA C H A F F I N— N E W YO R K

In the end, $500m, state of the art data
analytics and a 2,400-strong campaign
army was only enough to conquer
American Samoa.

That was the cold electoral accounting
confronting Michael Bloomberg and his
top advisers when they gathered at his
East 78th Street office in Manhattan
early on Wednesday morning to take
stock of his presidential bid.
heT ampaign was supposed to havec
taken flight on “Super Tuesday” but
instead crashed to earth in desultory
fashion with a lone victory in the US pro-
tectorate in the South Pacific that is
home to 55,000 souls. The decision to
pull out of the race was not a compli-
cated one, a person involved in the dis-
cussions said.
So ended a campaign the likes of
which had not previously been seen in
American politics, one that was pro-
pelled by technical wizardry, an entre-
preneur’s audacity and a seem-
inglyendless supply of money ut wasb
ultimately undone by circumstance and
human frailty.
To pollster John Zogby, who once
worked for Mr Bloomberg, the defeat
was a parable about the limits of money
in politics. “If you want to be president,
put your cheque book away and be pre-
pared to humble yourself in bad
weather and with a lot of pancakes,”he
advised.
But that sentiment may obscure a
larger truth: that Mr Bloomberg was a
contender. He entered the race only in
late November and, after a barrage of
advertising began shooting up the polls
as Joe Biden, the former vice-president
and champion of the moderate wing of
the Democratic party Mr Bloomberg
also represented, was stumbling.
By the end of January, several polls
showed Mr Bloomberg near the front of
the Democratic field and gaining
ground.Then came Las Vegas. On Feb-
ruary 19, Mr Bloomberg took the stage
in Nevada for his first Democratic
debate and was promptlyeviscerated yb
Massachusetts senator Elizabeth War-
ren. She attacked him relentlessly for
his wealth, crass comments about
women and the “stop-and-frisk” polic-
ing tactics that targeted young African-
American and Hispanic men while he
was mayor of New York.
“It’s certainly possible the strategy
could have worked,” one Bloomberg ally
mused. “Up until that first debate, he
had extraordinary momentum.”
For a 78-year-old Jewish billionaire
and former Republican, winning the
Democratic nomination for the presi-
dency in a highly partisan and populist
era was never going to be an easy propo-
sition.He jumped into therace in late
November fter concluding that Mra
Biden as at risk of losing to Mr Trumpw

I N T E R N AT I O N A L


L AU R E N F E D O R— WA S H I N GTO N

Elizabeth Warren, the senator from
Massachusetts and one-time frontrun-
ner in the Democratic presidential field,
is ending her campaign, setting up a
two-man race between Joe Biden
and Bernie Sanders for the party’s
nomination.
Ms Warren, 70, told her staff on a call
yesterday morning that she was leaving
the race. “We didn’t reach our goal, but
what we have done together — what you
have done — has made a lasting differ-
ence,” she said.

The decision came after adisappoint-
ing Super Tuesday or Ms Warren, whof
finished in third place in her home state
of Massachusetts, behind Mr Biden, the
former vice-president, and Mr Sanders,
the Vermont senator.
Ms Warren, who set up the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, ran on a
platform of “big, structural change”. She
touted her myriad policy proposals on
the campaign trail, often saying: “I have
a plan for that.” One of her signature
plans was for a 2 per centtax on all
wealth bove $50m.a
The Massachusetts senator was for a
time seen as the candidate to beat in a
crowded field of Democrats vying to
take on President Donald Trump in
November. But her campaign faltered
when she came under pressure to

explain how she would pay for “Medi-
care for All”, a plan to virtually elimi-
nate private health insurance that Mr
Sanders has also called for.
Her departuresets up a fight etweenb
Mr Biden, 77, and Mr Sanders, 78, for the
Democratic party’s presidential nomi-
nation. Tulsi Gabbard, the congress-
woman from Hawaii, is still running for
president but has collected just two del-
egates. While votes are still being
counted from California’s primary on
Tuesday, Mr Biden currently leads in
the national delegate count, at 596,
while Mr Sanders has 531.
Ms Warren failed to break through in
the early voting states ofIowa, where
she finished third, andNew Hampshire,
where she came in fourth despite being
a native of neighbouring Massachusetts.

She also came in fourth in theNevada
caucuses nd fifth in thea South Carolina
primary, followed by aSuper Tuesday
during which she failed to reach viabil-
ity in many key states, including dele-
gate-rich California and Texas.
The senator’s departure all but elimi-
nates the possibility that the US will
elect a female president in 2020.Her
announcement comes one day after
Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of
New York City,ended his campaign nda
threw his support behind Mr Biden. Pete
Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchardropped
their presidential campaigns before
Super Tuesday, also backing Mr Biden.
Ms Warren’s endorsement is highly
sought after by both Mr Biden, a moder-
ate Democrat, and Mr Sanders, a self-
described democratic socialist.

Democrats


Bloomberg failure


exposes political


limits of deep pockets


‘If you want to be


president, put your
cheque book away’

John Zogby, pollster

White House contest


Warren quits US presidential race


after disappointing Super Tuesday


Senator’s exit sets up


Sanders-Biden showdown
to take on Trump

C O U RT N E Y W E AV E R— WA S H I N GTO N

Ahead of Tuesday’s North Carolina
Democratic presidential primary, Melli-
cent Blythe was torn between two candi-
dates: Elizabeth Warren, the Massachu-
setts senator, and Amy Klobuchar, her
Minnesota colleague.
Yet when she cast her ballot, Ms
Blythe, a social worker in the city of Dur-
ham,found herself voting for former
vice-president Joe Biden: I feel hypo-“
critical because I did what I get frus-
trated with other people doing. I didn’t
vote for Warren, because I was petrified
she was going to lose out to [Bernie]
Sanders and then Sanders would lose
out to[President Donald] Trump.”
The 2020 Democratic primary began
with a record number of women vying
for the chance to run for the US presi-
dency.Of the 29 main Democratic can-
didatessix were women, including four
senators: Ms Warren, Ms Klobuchar,
Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand —
along with Tulsi Gabbard, the Hawaii
congresswoman, and Marianne Wil-
liamson, a motivational speaker.

Yesterday, the last woman with a
chance of winning the nomination
bowed out when Ms Warren quit, an
especially painful blow for the senator
who at one point was a frontrunner.
On Super Tuesday, the Massachusetts
senator won just a handful of delegates,
finishing third in her home state and
fourth in Oklahoma, the state where she
was born and grew up.
Ms Blythe saidshe had found Ms
Klobuchar and Ms Warrenmore
impressive than the moderate Mr Biden
or the progressive Mr Sanders. Butthere
was an implicit bias in society that she
herself seemed to have fallen victim to:
“We just don’t seem to like accom-
plished, capable women. As my sister-
in-law said, we have to vote for the
mediocre man to get the despicable man
out of office.”
Amanda Litman, co-founder of Run
for Something, an organisation that
encourages young people to run for
office, and a veteran of Hillary Clinton’s
2016 presidential campaign, said she
was “really sad” Ms Warren had not
done better.
“People want their vote to matter.
They want to feel like they are on the
winning team, and momentum and nar-
rative makes a difference,” Ms Litman
said. “A very small part of me is almost
relieved. Because if say Elizabeth War-

ren had gone all the way and lost, I’m not
sure they, [whoever] they are, would
have let a woman run again.”
She may not be wrong, according to
Lara Brown, political scientist at George
Washington University. The last time
Democrats chose a female vice-presi-
dential nominee was when Geraldine
Ferraro ran as Walter Mondale’s run-
ning mate in 1984. hey lost 49 of 50T
states to Ronald Reagan.
For Republicans, the lastsuch candi-
date was Sarah Palin, whose place on the

ticket in 2008 was believed to havehurt
John McCain’s campaign. “I think for the
Democratic party and for voters more
broadly there is a moment of self-reflec-
tion that has to be done after this race
about some of the gender biasesaround
electability,” said Kelly Dittmar, politi-
cal scientist at Rutgers University’s
Center for American Women and Poli-
tics. “There is a disconnect between
women's performance and the percep-
tion that women are somehow unelecta-
ble at the presidential level.”

Neither Ms Warren nor any of the
other female senators in thecontest had
lost an election before the 2020 prima-
ries, a contrast to Mr Sanders, who has
lost six House, Senate and gubernatorial
races.
Mary Anne Marsh, a Boston-based
Democratic strategist, said she believed
Ms Warren had made some strategic
mistakes, specifically her decision not
to go after Mr Sanders, her main chal-
lenger for the progressive vote. How-
ever, she believed there were other fac-
tors, with many voters thinking if Hil-
lary Clinton failed to beat Mr Trump,
what woman could. “I think it’s a flawed
analysis. But I think it’s a prevalent
thought that a lot of women had.”
Some women said they still saw some
room for optimism.Ms Blythe said both
she and her 18-year-old daughter,
another Warren fan who had voted for
Mr Biden, were hopeful that he would
pick a woman as his running mate if he
won the Democratic nomination.
Ms Marsh said many women voters
had come to the conclusion that Mr
Biden was best positioned to beat Mr
Trump in November. “Normally Demo-
crats are very emotional about who they
support. The old line: Democrats fall in
love, Republicans fall in line,” she said.
In 2020, that had been upended. “In this
race, it’s all about who can win.”

Primaries.Gender gap


Women struggle to convince voters


All the female candidates with


a chance of winning the party


nomination have dropped out


T


he Taliban has a saying:
“America has the watches;
we have the time.” Donald
Trump’s alarm is set for
November 3, which is when
he hopes to be re-elected. In between, he
wants to redeem his vow to pull US
troops from Afghanistan without trig-
gering a Taliban takeover.
The Taliban, on the other hand, has
most of the leverage as well as all the
time. Like a property dealer squeezing
ever more humiliating terms, it knows
the US president will not walk away.

He is committed to cutting and running.
In Mr Trump’s defence, nobody has a
better plan. In 2009,Joe Biden, then
vice-president and now Mr Trump’s
likely opponent, failed to convince
Barack Obama to strike a similar deal to
the one Mr Trump signed last week.
It is very simple. Those who have not
been keeping up should watch the latest
season ofHomeland, the Showtime
drama. The US withdraws most of its
troops from Afghanistan and releases
Taliban prisoners. In exchange, the Tali-
ban renounces terrorism and agrees to
talks with a weak and reluctant Afghan
government. It is a matter of time before
they regain control of Kabul.
I would gladly disclose what happens
next butHomelandairs on Sunday. The
pitfalls of Mr Trump’s deal are matching
the plot. Within hours of having signed
the deal last week, the Taliban resumed
its attacks on Afghan positions.

Mr Trump nevertheless this week got
on the phoneto Abdul Ghani Baradar,
co-founder of the Taliban. “The rela-
tionship is very good that I have with the
mullah,” Mr Trump said on Tuesday,
long after the truce was broken. On
Wednesday, the US launched an air
strike on Taliban positions.
We have seen this drama many times
before. In September, Mr Trump invited
Taliban leaders to his retreat at Camp
David to conclude the same deal they
signed last week.
The prospect of America’s president
hosting leaders of a terrorist group on
the anniversary of the September 11
attacks triggered the resignation of John
Bolton, Mr Trump’s hawkish national
security adviser.
His exit set the timetable back six
months. With justeight months to go
before the US election, Mr Trump can-
not afford any more delay.

The Taliban knows this and will test
Mr Trump to his limits. The question is
whether he can maintain the trappings
of adirty peace ntil polling day. Theu
Taliban already controls more than half
the country.

“Trump needs to sell this withdrawal
as a peace deal,” said Husain Haqqani, a
former Pakistan ambassador to the US,
now at the Hudson Institute.
“He knows from the real estate world
that a building with weak foundations
must not collapse before the sale is
complete.”

The larger question is whether any-
one in America really cares. Beyond
Washington, the answer is largely no.
Americans know US missiles can strike
terrorists at will without troops on the
ground, as often happens in the Middle
East and north Africa.
Mr Trump paid no price for abandon-
ingthe US’s Syrian Kurdish allies last
year. It is unlikely he will be punished
for not caring about the fate of Afghani-
stan’s government. Neither Mr Biden
nor Bernie Sanders are likely to criticise
Mr Trump forcutting America’s over-
seas presence.
But the world will take note of US
indifference to diplomacy. Mr Obama’s
decision to “surge” 100,000 US troops
into Afghanistan looks worse and worse
over time. His move doubled the length
of the war without achieving Afghan sta-
bility. More than a decade later, the
same terrorist group that hosted al-

Qaeda is poised to regain control. Its
pledges are worthless.
Overnearlytwo decades, the US has
been banging its head repeatedly
against the same Afghan brick wall. Yet,
it has never tried serious regional diplo-
macy. Mr Obama did appoint an AfPak
envoy, the late Richard Holbrooke, who
wanted to create a compact between
Afghanistan’s nearby powers, including
Russia, Iran, Pakistan, India and China,
to underwrite its stability and pledge
non-interference.
Holbrooke’s vision was a long shot. It
was also the kind of feat only the US
could attempt. Alas, Mr Obama could
barely bring himself to talk to Hol-
brooke, let alone listen to his dreams.
Mr Trump has no Holbrooke and no
patience for diplomacy. Others will pay
the price forUS fatigue.

[email protected]

Trump shuns opportunity for regional diplomacy in dirty peace agreement with Taliban


The pitfalls of Donald


Trump’s deal are
matching the plot of the

TV series ‘Homeland’


GLOBAL INSIGHT


Edward


Luce


Making waves: Michael Bloomberg
attends a rally in Houston, Texas

‘We just don’t seem


to like accomplished,
capable women’

North Carolina female voter

Bowing out: Elizabeth Warren, waving,
and Amy Klobuchar, with their male
opponents before a primary debate in
Charleston, South Carolina —Win McNamee/Getty

MARCH 6 2020 Section:World Time: 5/3/2020- 18:18 User:john.conlon Page Name:WORLD3 USA, Part,Page,Edition:USA, 4, 1

Free download pdf