THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. **** Saturday/Sunday, March 14 - 15, 2020 |A
R
esearchers are racing to de-
velop vaccines and antiviral
therapies to treat the
Covid-19 pandemic. One promising
option is immunotherapy, which
uses components of our immune
system to alter or boost its re-
sponse. Immunotherapy has been
used successfully to treat other vi-
ral diseases as well as cancer and
diseases of the immune system.
An important immunotherapeutic
approach uses natural killer cells.
These cells are part of the innate
immune system, which responds
immediately to new pathogens. (The
adaptive immune system, by con-
trast, develops specific responses
over time). NK cells home in on and
New York
S
omething terrible hap-
pened to classical music
during the 20th century,
and especially after 1945.
You may be called a reac-
tionary or a nostalgist if you ac-
knowledge this fact aloud, but ev-
ery concertgoer knows it. Many
individual composers continued
writing works of enduring value,
but the great preponderance of
classical music written over the
past 75 years is deliberately
opaque and aggressively ugly.
The causes are many and com-
plex: the abiding influence of
atonal music from earlier in the
century, the obsession with origi-
nality and shock value, the gradual
transformation of classical music
into a faux-scientific academic dis-
cipline. But the overall incoher-
ence is undeniable. Every fan of
classical music knows the feeling
of seeing a contemporary com-
poser on the program and in-
wardly despairing.
Some recent composers have re-
sisted the tendency to equate seri-
ous with dissonant or difficult—
Arvo Pärt in Estonia, the late
Dominick Argento in America. But
none have done so in quite the
guileless manner of English com-
poser Alma Deutscher. She writes
music that people want to hear:
orchestral and chamber works that
ordinary listeners—those who
aren’t invested in the “serious”
music industry—actually like.
Her oeuvre is small, but it in-
cludes chamber and orchestral
works of inventiveness, technical
sophistication, wit and, above all,
melodic richness. She has per-
formed her piano concerto and vi-
olin concerto with orchestras in
Europe and the U.S.; her opera,
“Cinderella,” was performed by
California’s Opera San José in 2018
and released on DVD by Sony Clas-
sical. In November, Sony released
“From My Book of Melodies,” a
collection of solo piano works.
Also, she turned 15 in February.
In December Miss Deutscher
played a concert of her works at
Carnegie Hall. The Orchestra of St.
Luke’s performed her violin and
piano concertos with the composer
as soloist for both. The perfor-
mance was enthusiastically re-
ceived, with the audience applaud-
ing between each movement of the
concertos and standing more than
once. I met her two days later at
the Park Hyatt Hotel in New York.
Those who saw Scott Pelley’s
2017 interview with Miss
Deutscher on “60 Minutes”
will know the Alma Deutscher
story’s rough outlines—she
composed a piano sonata at 6,
a piano concerto at 10, a full-
length opera by 12; she has a
preternatural talent for play-
ing two instruments and a
staggering ability to improvise
melodies. Two years after Mr.
Pelly’s interview, she is dis-
cernibly older but still far
from grown-up in appearance.
She wears pigtails and a
bright red dress.
I avoid the topic of her sta-
tus as a wunderkind and ask
instead about her education. “I
don’t go to school,” she says.
“I’m home-schooled. I read
lots and lots of books about
almost everything—history,
geography, fiction, science,
whatever. As long as they’re
interesting.” Her main aca-
demic challenge just now?
German. She and her family
live in Vienna, so “I must learn
to speak and write it. I’m reading
lots in German.”
She has spoken elsewhere of
melodies coming to her from an
early age, so I ask if they get in
the way of her study. “Very often,”
she says. “Sometimes when I’m
talking to someone or trying to
concentrate on something, a mel-
ody will come. It never comes
when you want it to come.” But,
she points out, “composition is not
like inspiration that just comes out
of the head and onto the page. It’s
work. I have studied many scores.
The greatest teachers are the old
masters. I’ve studied the scores of
Richard Strauss, of Beethoven, of
Mozart and many others.”
That she has studied the old
masters is plainly true. You will
know it if you’re passably familiar
with classical music from the 18th,
19th and early 20th centuries and
listen to Miss Deutscher’s orches-
tral works without knowing who
wrote them. Her music doesn’t
“sound like” any one composer but
bears the marks of many—Men-
delssohn and Mozart, for sure, but
also Bach, Georges Bizet and Rich-
ard Strauss.
That, for the cultural elite of
Europe and North America, is the
problem. Nobody wants to go on
record criticizing a child, but Miss
Deutscher is not embraced by the
music world’s influencers. Their
usually off-the-record complaint
has two parts. First, that is she is
one more child prodigy of the kind
we see come and go all the time—
exploited by the music industry
and a public eager for emotionally
shallow works of imitation art.
This criticism doesn’t accord
with her personality. Miss
Deutscher speaks her mind. Her
father and her agent sit nearby,
but they pay no attention to what
the girl is saying to me.
She is also ambitious—deter-
mined to get her point across in a
way that an exploited prodigy
would not be. She relishes talking
about her work and at several
points puts questions to me
(“Where were you sitting in the
hall? Could you hear the violin
properly?”). She is writing another
opera, she says, this one commis-
sioned by the Salzburg State The-
atre, though she coyly refuses to
reveal the subject. Does she plan
to compose a symphony? “Yes,
that’s one of my next projects,”
she says, glad I asked, and adds
that she’s already written one
movement. “Since I was 6, I
wanted to write a symphony. I’d
read a novel in which Nannerl Mo-
zart”—Wolfgang Amadeus’s sis-
ter—“secretly writes symphonies,
and she wasn’t taken seriously be-
cause she was a girl. So I thought,
I want to write symphonies and I
want people to take me seriously.”
T
he second, more serious crit-
icism of Miss Deutscher is
that as a composer she is a
mere savant—capable of producing
ersatz versions of the canonical
works of Western music but in no
way saying anything new or origi-
nal or interesting.
The first thing to say about this
is that she is 15. Mozart’s and
Mendelssohn’s compositions from
their childhood years don’t com-
pare favorably with their mature
works. But Miss Deutscher’s ur-
bane critics don’t fault her for a
lack of technical sophistication.
They dislike her music for the
same reason audiences love it.
They object to its traditional to-
nality, its straightforward emo-
tional appeal, its refusal to ac-
knowledge the repugnance of
human life.
Miss Deutscher is keenly aware
of this criticism, and at Carnegie
Hall she addressed it straightfor-
wardly. Before the evening’s final
work, she spoke from the stage.
“Now, I’ve always wanted to write
beautiful music,” she told the audi-
ence, “music that comes out of the
heart and speaks directly to the
heart. But some people have told
me that nowadays, melodies and
beautiful harmonies are no longer
acceptable in serious classical mu-
sic, because, in the 21st century,
music must reflect the ugliness of
the modern world.” You could hear
people in the audience laughing
with her. The rubes! “Well,” she
went on, “in this waltz, instead of
trying to make my music artifi-
cially ugly in order to reflect the
modern world, I went in exactly
the opposite direction.”
In the piece, “Siren Sounds
Waltz,” the music moves from the
dissonant sounds of Vienna’s city
center, with its noise and ambu-
lance sirens, to a buoyant big-
hearted waltz in which the “si-
rens” are made to sound like
Homer’s rather than Vienna’s.
Because of her youth, her de-
spisers can’t openly spurn her mu-
sic. That will soon change. She’s
an ill fit for the present age. Her
pronunciation and gait suggest
polish and privilege. She embraces
the best of the past and speaks of
beauty without irony or resent-
ment. Just by being who she is,
she’s bound to provoke a fight.
Is she aware that she’s taking
sides in a long-running argument
about the nature and role of mu-
sic? She answers indirectly: “I
think it’s quite simple. I just want
to write music I myself enjoy. I
wouldn’t want to write music I
don’t enjoy right at the moment. If
I had to write music I didn’t
like, I would prefer to be in a
different profession—to be a
travel agent or something. I
don’t see what there is to jus-
tify writing music I don’t like.”
Miss Deutscher is careful not
to dismiss atonal or “ugly” mu-
sic. The Metropolitan Opera, a
few blocks away, has just fin-
ished its run of Alban Berg’s lu-
rid opera “Wozzeck” (1922),
about a poor soldier who kills
his common-law wife. I ask
about this and other dissonant
masterworks, but she doesn’t
take the bait. “I’m very happy
for other people to write what-
ever music they like or find
beautiful,” she says. “And if
some people want to go to
those concerts, fine, wonderful.
But for myself, I’m not yet re-
ally interested in this type of
music. The important thing for
me is that I write what I like.
And who knows? This might
change in 10 years. But I’m not
worried about that.”
Even Arnold Schoenberg
(1874-1951), who famously in-
vented a dissonant musical lan-
guage called serialism, remarked
that there is still much good music
to be written in C major. Miss
Deutscher agrees: “I have more to
say, a lot more to say, in this musi-
cal language,” she says, sitting
erect and speaking volubly. “If I
were to write a novel, I would
write it in English,” she says. “I
wouldn’t try to write a completely
new language. I would try to think
of a new story to tell, and I would
tell it as best I could, but I would
tell it in English. I wouldn’t write
it in some imaginary language I in-
vented.”
In October, Miss Deutscher re-
ceived the European Culture Prize.
In her acceptance remarks, she
suggested that perhaps “a more
tolerant age is dawning, when mel-
ody and beauty will once again be
permitted.” One may surely hope.
She said she wants to be taken se-
riously. Does she worry that music
critics won’t? “I don’t even read
the reviews about myself,” she
says with a laugh. “I don’t read
the internet.”
S
he does have a website, com-
plete with quotes from lauda-
tory reviews. But she says
she plays for the audience, not the
critics: “The people, did you see
them? The people loved it. The au-
dience stood many times. They
were elated, uplifted. What mat-
ters is what the audience thinks.
What the critics write—and I don’t
read it anyway—it doesn’t bother
me....Iseethereaction of the
people. They say what they mean,
they clap when they want to clap.”
Mr. Swaim is an editorial page
writer at the Journal.
A Girl Makes Music Without Irony or Ugliness
KEN FALLIN
This youthful composer
likes to speak ‘directly to
the heart.’ Critics won’t
like it, but audiences do.
THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW with Alma Deutscher| By Barton Swaim
OPINION
Hey, Teacher, Teach Those Kids at Home
School districts
across the nation are
starting to close as
the Covid-19 pan-
demic spreads along
with the fear that we
are doing too little,
too late to contain it.
No one knows how
long affected dis-
tricts will be in re-
cess, but it is likely
to be measured in weeks and months
rather than days. Regardless of
whether students are in class or at
home, schools must dramatically ex-
pand their capacity to provide re-
mote learning.
When student learning is inter-
rupted by school closures, it can have
catastrophic consequences on educa-
tional development. I’ve seen the
damage done to communities where
schools had to close for long periods
following natural disasters. Many
children, especially those from
poorer neighborhoods, never get fully
back on track.
Fortunately, we live in a different
world than we did in 2005, when
Hurricane Katrina decimated New Or-
leans and closed all but a handful of
schools for almost a year. We now
have the technology necessary to
teach students effectively and effi-
ciently using the internet. These tools
can ensure that learning continues
uninterrupted during a crisis, while
providing schools with collateral edu-
cational and financial benefits.
Many schools and districts already
use laptops, tablet computers, smart
boards and other devices to support
classroom instruction. Not every dis-
trict in the country has the ability to
convene students in virtual class-
rooms, but every school system has
at least thought about ways to in-
struct students remotely in the event
of a disruption. For those that ha-
ven’t yet developed strategic plans to
build an instructional system with re-
mote-learning capacity, the current
crisis should drive home the need to
do so.
A ready and waiting remote-learn-
ing system is a game changer during
a major emergency, not to mention
more common disturbances such as
weather-related disruptions, local-
ized health hazards and students
forced into long-term absences for
various reasons. Even when school is
in regular, nonemergency session, re-
mote-learning infrastructure en-
hances classroom instruction and in-
dividualizes students’ learning
experiences. Students who can’t at-
tend school in a traditional setting
because of disabilities or health is-
sues can “dial in” and participate
fully in class through the remote-
learning system.
Remote learning offers educational
opportunities for adolescents whose
behavior problems bar them from the
general-education population. It can
also provide families better support
by providing regular access to instruc-
tors. In some places, it could even
ease overcrowded classrooms.
Ensuring that all schools have the
capacity to provide high-quality re-
mote instruction need not be finan-
cially prohibitive. Even financially
strapped school systems have op-
tions. Schools can secure needed cur-
riculum and instructional materials
through subscriptions and by using
online materials. By leasing the tech-
nology, a district can create and
maintain a comprehensive, techno-
logically supported instructional sys-
tem at a fraction of what it would
cost to buy laptops and tablets out-
right. A byproduct of such arrange-
ments is that vendors will often do-
nate used laptops and tablets to the
district when the time comes to re-
place them with newer models, usu-
ally about every three years. With
proper maintenance, schools can ex-
pand their technology assets at little
to no additional cost.
Other benefits to remote learning
include reducing the cost of transpor-
tation and minimizing wear and tear
on facilities. By helping maintain and
improve student enrollment and av-
erage daily attendance, remote learn-
ing will help preserve and even in-
crease state and federal education
funding, which is often determined
by these measures.
Although it’s possible now to teach
students remotely, and it may even
be desirable in moments like this one,
it’s far from optimal. There’s still no
substitute for in-person, high-quality
teachers. I also don’t mean to mini-
mize the socialization that schools
provide. Learning alongside other
students is critical to ensuring that
young people eventually mature into
healthy, engaged and socially adept
adults.
We all pray that the coronavirus
will prove to be a manageable crisis.
But it should serve as a wake-up call
that the institutions we take for
granted, including public schools,
need to be prepared for new uncer-
tainties. Remote learning is far better
than no learning, which I witnessed
in New Orleans for too long after
Hurricane Katrina.
Mr. Vallas formerly ran the public
school systems in Chicago, Philadel-
phia and the Louisiana Recovery
School District.
With schools closing for
weeks or months, it’s time
for districts to get serious
about remote learning.
CROSS
COUNTRY
By Paul G.
Vallas
Include ‘Natural Killer’ Cells in the Covid-19 Arsenal
kill cancerous or virally infected
cells by recognizing molecules
those cells express called stress an-
tigens. For patients incapable of an
adequate innate immune response,
adoptive transfer therapy by infus-
ing NK cells is a direct way to bol-
ster the immune system’s function.
My company, Celularity, has pio-
neered the use of cells derived from
the human placenta left over after
childbirth. Celularity has a proven
system of producing high-quality
cellular medicines under the Food
and Drug Administration’s Good
Manufacturing Practices. The pla-
cental NK cell shows promise as a
safe, efficacious treatment for vari-
ous cancers.
Designated CYNK-001, Celular-
ity’s experimental NK cell is under
clinical investigation with an open
Investigational New Drug applica-
tion on file with the FDA in blood
cancers. It will soon be tested in
solid tumors. It is easily adminis-
tered by intravenous infusion and
has been shown to be safe and well
tolerated in patients.
Scientists demonstrated two de-
cades ago that a deficiency of NK
cells in patients infected with the
SARS coronavirus was associated
with more-severe disease and the
presence of SARS-specific antibod-
ies. NK cell therapy is a deployable,
rapidly scalable approach to treat-
ing Covid-19. And it’s well estab-
lished that immunotherapy can en-
hance vaccine-induced immunity.
Celularity has submitted an In-
vestigational New Drug application
for NK-cell treatment of Covid-19.
Once it’s approved, we could scale
up manufacturing within 45 days.
The FDA has created an expedited
review process for such new thera-
pies. Swift action to streamline reg-
ulations is providing a window of
opportunity for the U.S. again to
lead the world in biomedical inno-
vation, which will save many lives.
Dr. Hariri is founder and CEO of
Celularity.
By Robert J. Hariri
They’re part of the innate
immune system, which
quickly attacks pathogens.