The Spartan Regime_ Its Character, Origins, and Grand Strategy - Paul Anthony Rahe

(Dana P.) #1
1

Prologue


The Spartan Enigma


Patriotism is conducive to good morals, and good morals contribute to patrio-
tism. The less we are able to satisfy our private passions, the more we abandon
ourselves to those of a more general nature. Why are monks so fond of their
order? Precisely because of those things which make it insupportable. Their rule
deprives them of all the things on which the ordinary passions rest: there re-
mains, then, only that passion for the rule which torments them. The more
austere the rule, that is, the more it curbs their inclinations, the more force it
gives to the one inclination which it leaves them.

—Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu

T


o understand ancient Sparta, the part she played in Greek history, and


the role that her image played in the history of the West, one must
come to understand the Spartan regime and way of life—which is no
mean task.^1 Lacedaemon is now and always has been a great puzzle. She trou-
bled even the ancients. In antiquity, some thought her a democracy; others, an
oligarchy. In one passage of Plato’s Laws, the Athenian stranger describes her
constitution as a mixture of monarchy and democracy; a few pages later, the
Spartan Megillus admits that even he is at a loss for a name to give the polity:
when considering the ephorate as a magistracy, he is tempted to call it a tyr-
anny; when looking at the regime as a whole, he is led to think Sparta the most
democratic of all the cities; and it would be altogether strange to deny that she

is an aristocracy. But, he adds, there is a kingship in the place, for her two
basıleîs rule for life, and theirs is the oldest of kingships. Aristotle suffered a
fate similar to that of Plato’s Megillus. When reflecting on the strife between
rich and poor that racked most Greek cities, he could describe the Lacedae-
monian regime as a mixture of democracy and oligarchy; when thinking of
the Spartan way of life, he found it necessary to term the city an aristocracy

somehow both democratic and oriented toward the pursuit of virtue.^2
The confusion persists. In the age stretching from Niccolò Machiavelli to

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Sparta was often considered a model for the constitu-

Free download pdf