terminal that respond to released neurotransmitter. For example, at
a glutamatergic synapse, glutamate neurotransmitter may interact
with glutamate receptors located on the presynaptic axon terminal to
open Na‘ or Ca** ion channels and thus prolong depolarization in the
axon terminal, thereby strengthening the synapse.
Or, there may be retrograde signals from a postsynaptic cell that
influence neurotransmitter release in the axon terminal. Endo-
cannabinoids released from a postsynaptic dendrite may interact
with presynaptic cannabinoid G-protein-coupled receptors to prolong
depolarization or influence gene expression. For example, influencing
the transcription and translation of genes that code for presynap-
tic reuptake transporters can have a long-term effect on synaptic
strength. More reuptake transporter proteins means neurotransmit-
ter is removed from the synaptic cleft more rapidly after release—a
smaller signal and thus a weaker synapse. Fewer reuptake transporter
proteins means neurotransmitter remains in the synaptic cleft for a
longer time after release—more signal and thus a stronger synapse.
A postsynaptic mechanism for changing the strength of a synapse
is to influence gene transcription so that greater or lesser numbers of
neurotransmitter receptors are produced and inserted into the post-
synaptic membrane. More neurotransmitter receptors means a larger
impact from incoming neurotransmitter—a stronger synapse. Other
things being equal, fewer postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptors
mean a weaker synapse.
Likewise, G-protein-coupled receptor effects on transcription of
nerve growth factors may influence the branching of axons and den-
drites, the sprouting of dendritic spines, and the formation of new
synapses.
The formation of new neurons from precursor cells provides
another potential avenue of neuroplasticity. In contrast to what had
steven felgate
(Steven Felgate)
#1