Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain_ Environment, Identity, and Empire in Qing China\'s Borderlands

(Ann) #1
herd size to four hundred head from much smaller groups ranging from

230 to 312 head prevalent since 1725.^26

Although breeding was promoted by altering herd size, it was

reinforced for human herders through the structure of herd personnel

management, which ultimately reached to Beijing and the Neiwufu.

Results of annual censuses and periodic round-ups brought rewards in

sable, satin, or cloth for exceeding breeding quotas. Punishments of

lashes,fines, or demotions were meted out for failing to meet quotas.

Complicated methods to standardize surpluses and shortfalls, calculated

from 1725 in“units”(fen)offive hundred and two hundred animals,

respectively, were imposed to facilitate evaluation of herder husbandry.^27

This system was the primary state instrument to compel humans and

animals to conform to imperial pastoralism.

The effects of this system appear in relatively precise measurements

of livestock vital statistics, as in the data ofTable 7. Sheepflocks grazing

in the Dariganga and Shangdu/Dabsun Nuur pasture complexes can

be tracked over a twenty-one-year period of relatively completefigures.

Theseflocks were the largest concentrations of state pasture livestock and

statutorily set at 210 , 000 head organized in 410 flocks in Shangdu/

Dabsun Nuur and 100 , 000 head, probably in 80 flocks, in Dariganga.^28

Thefigures inTable 8 reveal that these statutory norms were rarely

achieved. During this period overall Shangdu/Dabsun Nuurflocks aver-

aged 169 , 764 head, or 19 percent below their official strength, and

Darigangaflocks averaged 65 , 260 head, or almost 35 percent below their

official strength. Theflocks managed an average annual growth rate for

this twenty-one-year period of only 1. 2 percent, although thisfigure does

not represent reproduction alone. Largeflock declines during 1753 – 54 ,

for example, occurred mainly because of transfers of 105 , 000 head to

army encampments. Direct comparison of birth and mortalityfigures

suggests a much larger increase of 5 percent on average.^29

Livestock populations could alsofluctuate wildly in response to the

steppe ecology. When the population of sixteen mare camel herds dropped

almost 43 percent from 1730 to 1736 in Shangdu/Dabsun Nuur, Mongol

herders soon complained that“the local water and grasslands were not

suited to”camel breeding. The camels were duly sent back to better

pastures in Dariganga, where they had been productively grazing up to

1732. In this instance, pastoralism could not adapt sufficiently to the

Shangdu/Dabsun Nuur grasslands, which may have been overgrazed,

although drought and disease were also factors.^30 The only solution under

such conditions was new space, rather than intensifying use of existing

124 Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain
Free download pdf