Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain_ Environment, Identity, and Empire in Qing China\'s Borderlands
ann
(Ann)
#1
to the major Qing competitor for regional hegemony, the Konbaung.
Some of the stimulating and inhibiting effects of this rivalry on the south-
western borderland were similar to those achieved by Konbaung Myan-
mar’s northern counterpart, Romanov Russia.
Subversion of indigenous Qing subjects was one such effect. The
immediate cause of the 1766 – 69 war itself concerned Qing and Kon-
baung wrangling over the territorial implications of indigenous alle-
giance.^61 The Konbaung court was able to split the allegiance of at least
some Qing chieftainships, which in Myanmar’s view formed the trans-
Irawaddy and trans-Salween Shan States. The ambiguous relations main-
tained by native chieftainships with both powers enabled Myanmar to
claim joint territorial sovereignty with the Qing. The Konbaung made
such a claim regarding the Cheli native chieftainship in the wake of a
major conflict from 1807 to 1808 in the area between Myanmar and the
Siamese client state of Lanna (Chiangmai).^62
Despite the throne’s outraged declaration that a“fixed boundary”
(dingjie) already existed that precluded any kind of joint jurisdiction
between“the Celestial court and foreign tribals”in Cheli, Qing officials
were quite aware of the divided loyalties of native chieftainships.^63 Some
admitted that Gengma and“all dynastic chieftainships near Myanmar”
maintained an“unofficial,” if regular, political relationship with the
Konbaung until at least the mid–eighteenth century. Such contacts
remained an ongoing concern after the turn of the century. At that time
Belin affirmed that a primary task of frontier defense was to prevent
“collusion” between native chieftainships and either Myanmar or
Lanna.^64 Transborder political ties incompatible with their status as
dynastic client states could make chieftainships more a burden than a
bulwark for the province.
One important spatial condition of the ambiguity of chieftainship
allegiance was that southwestern provincial borders wereoperationally
synonymous withjunxianand not chieftainshipboundaries. This dis-
tinction was occasionally, and inconsistently, expressed through the use
of different terms forjunxianboundaries (bianorjiao) and chieftainship
boundaries (jing). The operational limits of direct dynastic control
indicated by these terms explain why“Yunnan” chieftainships such
as Menglian and Gengma could be considered“beyond the border”
(bianwai) of the prefecture itself.^65
Qing frontier policy reinforced this ethnic administrative divide by
generally discouraging“reckless”official interference in chieftainships
“along the border.”These off-limits border polities included Gengma,
Borderland Hanspace in the Nineteenth Century 247