Barron\'s 03.16.2020

(やまだぃちぅ) #1

34 BARRON’S March 16, 2020


Photograph byRICKY RHODES


Q&A


An Interview with Ed Yardeni,


CEO, Yardeni Research


Bear Won’t


Depart Till


Midyear


W


hat a week. The long bull market finally


ended, as worries about the coronavirus


pandemic and slumping oil torpedoed


stock prices.Barron’searlier had been


talking to Ed Yardeni, the renowned


stock market forecaster, about his new


book,Fed Watching for Fun and Profit, but


the pandemic required several re-interviews to keep


pace with quickly worsening developments.


Yardeni, like all good analysts, is disciplined in evalu-


ating unknowns and competing scenarios and adjusting


his views. Although he has dismissed previous market


jitters as “panics,” he has downgraded his forecasts for


growth and earnings to reflect the new unknowns. Read


the following condensed and edited remarks for more.


Barron’s: You normally have a sunny outlook. But


officially, we’re in a bear market.


Ed Yardeni:I’d expected we might get a correction; I


didn’t expect a virus. We’ve seen the impact on the stock


market. We’re about to see the impact on the global


economy. We should anticipate very shortly a pretty


substantial drop in consumer confidence. [The Confer-


ence Board Consumer Confidence Index will be released


on March 31. In February, it increased slightly.] I don’t


care how good the labor market has been. People are


naturally going to fear the worst, given the extreme mea-


sures governments are taking. They’ll focus on the latest


bad news and ignore areas of progress.


The problem is, the pandemic of fear is spreading


much faster than the actual virus. China had 80,796


cases as of yesterday, with a population of 1.4 billion.


South Korea had 7,869 cases, with a population of 51


million. They’re making progress, apparently, in China


and South Korea in containing the virus, and even in the


epicenter of Hubei province they’re talking about slowly


By LESLIE P. NORTON


March 16, 2020 BARRON’S 35


The economist, who generally was bullish throughout stocks’ long march upward,


has long been viewed as one of the top market and economic analysts on Wall


Street. His research has a broad following among institutional investors.


resuming transportation. I don’t know


what purpose it serves when [German


Chancellor] Angela Merkel scares the


living daylights out of people. [Merkel


has warned that 70% of Germany’s


population could contract coronavi-


rus.] It didn’t even spread to 70% of


the Chinese. People aren’t focusing on


the fact that 80% who get infected are


likely to suffer only mild symptoms,


and that may be understated; that the


most vulnerable are older people. Italy


has everyone spooked: It has a highly


geriatric profile, and we know that


older people are more susceptible to


the virus. Put this into perspective:


Nearly 1.25 million people die in road


crashes each year globally, on average,


3,287 a day. An additional 20 million


to 50 million are injured or disabled.


We’ll see a recession on a global


basis. Japan and Germany will un-


doubtedly fall into recessions. Italy will


have a very severe recession, with its


national lockdown. Is the U.S. economy


resilient enough to decouple? Probably


not. The fear factor is spreading faster


than economists like myself can gauge.


My guess is that the virus will dissipate


significantly by the middle of the year,


based on the experience of China and


South Korea and previous virus out-


breaks. The recession and bear market


in stocks should end by then.


How much have you reduced your


earnings forecasts?


I took my estimate for S&P 500 index


profits down from an increase of 5.5%


to flat, with an earnings recession in


the first half of the year. A global reces-


sion is very likely and for the U.S. in-


creasingly likely. I’m still looking for


2% real gross-domestic-product


growth for the year as a whole. On top


of everything, the Saudis and Russians


are fighting about oil production,


which caused prices to collapse. That


alone is reminiscent of 2015, when we


had a growth recession in the global


economy and earnings, and it added to


downside risks for the energy sector.


My thinking is they won’t be able to


take the pain of having oil prices this


low for long. On the supply side, there


will be cutbacks: U.S. shale producers


will be forced to cut production, or the


Saudis and Russians will come up with


a deal because prices this low are a


calamity for both of them. They


wouldn’t mind if there’s collateral dam-


age in the U.S. The best cure for low oil


prices is low oil prices. But then we’re


back to the demand side and having to


be a virologist and a psychologist.


How low do stocks go from here?


A 30% drop from the top of the S&P


500 brings us to 2300-2400. I had


originally expected 3,500 on the S&P


500 by year end, and we got to 3,300


in February. Now, I’m thinking 3,500


will be in 2021. There will be recovery


and resumption of the bull market. I


think it will be like 1987 all over again.


Most of the downside should occur


between now and the middle of the


year. My year-end target is 2900 on


the S&P 500.


The bull-bear ratio, which comes


out every week, has taken a deep dive.


The faster bearishness goes up, the


better for the outlook. The bull-bear


ratio is 1.58. It had been 2.04 the week


before and over three at the beginning


of the year. A lot of it is still people


moving from bulls to the correction


camp. Bears only edged up from


20.4% to 22.9%. In 2008, the percent-


age of bears was over 50%. A lot of


people are still net bullish.


Should investors be buying now?


If you have cash, this is the time to buy


quality names, some of the dividend-


yielding stocks. They’re trashing utili-


ties, consumer staples, quality compa-


nies that pay dividends and have


always paid dividends in recessions. In


an environment where interest rates


are close to zero and may stay there for


some time, dividend stocks are quite


attractive. People sell companies they


like in panic environments because it’s


harder to raise cash [with illiquid


names]. There could be another down-


draft in oil—so no rush to jump into


energy stocks, even though I’m not in


the camp that believes we’re never go-


ing to use oil again. The best opportu-


nities are in blue-chip companies with


a long history of paying dividends.


Last year, you started recommend-


ing that U.S. investors buy over-


seas equities.


I did that last October, after the Fed-


eral Reserve lowered interest rates for


the third time, because the U.S. was


pretty richly valued. This past Febru-


ary, I recommended people stay home


[with investments], given this virus.


What’s the worst-case scenario?


That it’s 2008 all over again. That’s


unsettling, because the Fed doesn’t


have much ammo left, and fiscal pol-


icy is tough to get going, and it means


bigger deficits.


You’ve described Fed chief Jerome


Powell as a pragmatist. Will we see


“Helicopter Jerome” soon? [For-


mer Fed chief Ben Bernanke once


suggested that ametaphorical heli-


copter drop of money could com-


bat deflation.]


To avoid a worst-case scenario, Presi-


dent Donald Trump and Powell could


work out helicopter money—a tax cut


financed with bonds purchased by the


Fed. The good news is that banks are


in better shape than they were going


into 2008. The bad news is that half of


nonfinancial investment-grade corpo-


rate bonds are triple-B rated and on


the edge of turning into junk. If [an


institutional investor] is required to


own investment-grade, there could be


more pressure on credit spreads.


Trump is talking about help for the


shale sector. Does it make sense for


the government to bail out the shale


industry, when in this contentious


political environment, the only thing


they can agree on is relief for low- and


middle-income people at risk from


incomes being hit hard?


None of these policies can create a


recovery. To do that, we really have to


get past this pandemic of fear. The


Fed will be looking for more-uncon-


ventional policies, which will un-


doubtedly lead them to lowering in-


terest rates to zero and, once we get


there, revive quantitative-easing pur-


chases of bonds. Eric Rosengren, the


head of the Fed in Boston, threw out


the idea that Congress may need to


amend the Federal Reserve Act to let


the Fed buy other assets, possibly


corporate bonds. Restarting pur-


chases of Treasury bonds won’t make


a difference since the bond yield is


already close to zero. Fiscal stimulus


measures like tax cuts will help to


soften the blow, but can easily be fi-


nanced at near zero yields currently. If


those yields rise, then QE can help


keep a lid on them.


Trump has been beating on Powell


to lower rates. I wouldn’t be surprised


to see a Rose Garden news conference


where Trump and Powell announce


helicopter money—a tax cut financed


by the Treasury, with the Fed agreeing


to buy those bonds. I’d give it a 30% to


40% likelihood. [The Federal Reserve


said this past week that it would inject


more than $1.5 trillion into short-term


funding markets to prevent ominous


trading conditions from creating a


sharper economic contraction.]


The stock market has adored


Trump, and vice versa. What now?


I’d give Trump’s response a C-minus.


He can’t afford to be viewed as hav-


ing bungled the government’s re-


sponse to the coronavirus. This could


be his Hurricane Katrina. [Former


President George W. Bush is per-


ceived by many as having failed to


deal withthe devastating hurricane


quickly enough.] But this would be


Katrina, right before the election. He


could very well lose if he’s widely


perceived as having been too optimis-


tic and not responding with enough


urgency. [Current Democratic front-


runner] Joe Biden will play that issue


every time he speaks. He’s already


saying the president has bungled it.


It’s an open horse race. Trump has


made it very clear over his term that


he views the stock market in some


ways as a better and more useful poll


than the other polls of citizen senti-


ment. Now he’s stuck with that. If


Trump loses this war against this


virus, he won’t get another term.


How would a Biden presidency


be taken by the market?


The market could live with Biden. The


market focuses on earnings and valua-


tions. Biden is not the kind of threat to


the underlying structure of business


the way Sen. Bernie Sanders might


have been. We had eight years of Pres-


ident Obama, another Democrat, and


the stock market did extremely well.B


“If Trump loses this war against this virus,


he won’t get another term.”Ed Yardeni


Opportunity


Beckons?


“If you have


cash, this is the


time to buy some


quality names,


some dividend-


yielding stocks.”


2900


Yardeni’s year-end


estimate for the


S&P 500, after it


bounces back


from a plunge that


he says could take


it as low as 2300.

Free download pdf