78 NaTIoNal SCIENCE TEaChERS aSSoCIaTIoN
Chapter 4 Teaching Science as Inquiry
In a separate chapter, “Effective Learning and Teaching,” Science for All
Americans (AAAS 1989, pp. 147–149) has a general recommendation: “Teaching
Should Be Consistent With the Nature of Scientific Inquiry,” followed by specific
recommendations:
• Start with questions about nature
• Engage students actively
• Concentrate on the collection and use of evidence
• Provide historical perspectives
• Insist on clear expression
• Use a team approach
• Do not separate knowing from finding out
• Deemphasize the memorization of technical vocabulary
Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS 1993) provides actual learning
outcomes for the aforementioned chapters on the nature of science, historical
perspectives, and habits of mind. In addition, there is an excellent research base
that indicates what students should know and be able to do relative to various
benchmarks. Project 2061 also set in place goals and specific benchmarks for
the teaching aspect of scientific inquiry as content and made recommendations
for using teaching techniques associated with inquiry. The work of this project
clearly set the stage and influenced the National Science Education Standards
(NRC 1996).
National Science Education Standards
More than a decade ago, the National Science Education Standards (NRC 1996)
presented national policies that included teaching science as inquiry. Release
of the standards again brought the issue of teaching science as inquiry to the
forefront in the education community. In the National Science Education Standards
(NRC 1996), scientific inquiry refers to several related but different aspects of
teaching and learning: the ways scientists study the natural world, activities of
students, strategies of teaching, and outcomes that students should learn. The
National Science Education Standards provides the following statement on scien-
tific inquiry:
[I]nquiry is a multifaceted activity that involves making observations; posing
questions; examining books and other sources of information to see what is
already known; planning investigations; reviewing what is already known in
light of experimental evidence; using tools to gather, analyze, and interpret
data; proposing the results. Inquiry requires identification of assumptions, use
of critical and logical thinking, and consideration of alternative explanations.
(NRC 1996, p. 23)
Copyright © 2010 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to http://www.nsta.org/permissions.