Chapter 5 Science Teaching and assessing Students’ Scientific literacy
tHE tEACHING OF SCIENCE: 21 st-CENTURY PERSPECTIVES 113
ment. However, these same students are not optimistic about how select envi-
ronmental issues will improve during the next 20 years. Within this conclusion,
boys tend to be more optimistic and girls tend to be more concerned and respon-
sible about environmental issues.
Concluding Discussion
In an early section of the chapter, I described different dimensions of scientific
literacy. Nominal literacy is the dimension in which students associate terms with
a general area of science, but their general understanding is lacking overall.
Another dimension of scientific literacy includes vocabulary—the technical
words of science and technology. I refer to this dimension as functional scientific
literacy. Learners demonstrating functional scientific literacy use scientific words
appropriately and adequately. Relative to science and technology, learners should
meet minimum standards of literacy as it is usually defined. That is, given their
age, stage of development, and education levels, learners should be able to read
and write passages that include scientific and technological vocabulary.
For years, functional scientific literacy has received extraordinary emphasis
in science teaching, and educators generally equated the goal of achieving scien-
tific literacy with attaining vocabulary. Science teachers should reduce (but not
eliminate) the current overemphasis on functional scientific literacy and increase
the emphasis on other domains and dimensions of scientific literacy.
Conceptual and procedural scientific literacy describes another dimension of
scientific literacy. Learners should relate information and experiences to concep-
tual ideas that unify the disciplines and fields of science. In addition, literacy in
science must also include abilities and understandings relative to the procedures
and processes that make science a unique way of knowing.
Scientific literacy extends beyond vocabulary, conceptual schemes, and
procedural methods to include other understandings about science. We must
help learners develop perspectives of science that include the history of scien-
tific ideas, the nature of science and technology, and the role of science and tech-
nology in personal life and society. This is multidimensional scientific literacy.
The latter portion of the chapter used the PISA 2006 Science survey to
explore the presentation of an assessment of scientific literacy. The framework,
sample items, and results were examples that science teachers might use to
design programs of curriculum, instruction, and assessment that might be
used to answer the Sisyphean question in science education: What is important
for citizens to know, value, and be able to do in situations involving science
and technology?
Copyright © 2010 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to http://www.nsta.org/permissions.