266
PEOPLE
ARE NOT
100 PERCENT
RATIONAL
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
U
ntil the 1980s standard
economic theory was
dominated by the idea of
“rational economic man” (pp.52–53).
Individuals were understood to be
agents who look at all decisions
rationally, weighing the costs and
benefits to themselves and making
a decision that will give them the
best outcome. Economists thought
that this was how people behaved
in situations of both certainty and
uncertainty, and they formalized
the idea of rational decision making
in expected utility theory (pp.162–
63). In reality, however, people often
make irrational decisions that don’t
give them the highest payoffs and
may even hurt their own prospects.
IN CONTEXT
FOCUS
Decision making
KEY THINKERS
Amos Tversky (1937–96)
Daniel Kahneman (1934 – )
BEFORE
1940s US economist Herbert
Simon argues that rational
decision alone does not explain
human decision making.
1953 French economist
Maurice Allais criticizes
expected utility theory, saying
that real-life decisions are not
always taken rationally.
AFTER
1990 Economists Andrei
Shleifer and Lawrence
Summers show that irrational
decisions can affect prices.
2008 US psychologist and
economist Dan Ariely publishes
Predictably Irrational, showing
irrationality has a pattern.