The Economics Book

(Barry) #1

308 ECONOMICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT


be considered in economic terms
as a public good (pp.46–47), which
tends to be undersupplied by
markets; pollution can be seen as
an externality (p.137), where the
social costs of an action are not
reflected in prices and so are not
fully borne by the person taking it.
For these reasons Stern described
climate change as the greatest
market failure ever experienced.


Unequal nations
The first hurdle for economists
such as Nordhaus and Stern was to
convince governments to introduce
measures that would be harmful to
their economies in the short run
but would mitigate more damaging
consequences in the long run. The
second was to find the most efficient
way of enforcing an emissions policy.
Not all governments were easily
persuaded. The more developed


economies, which are mainly in
temperate areas, are not likely to
suffer the worst consequences of
a rise in global temperatures. The
likely changes in climate will hit
poorer countries much harder. This
means that, in many cases, the
countries with the greatest
incentive to mitigate the effects of
climate change are those that are
producing the least pollution.
The worst polluters, such as
the US, Europe, and Australia,
have been reluctant to accept
that governments should impose
expensive policies. Even if they
did, the pollution is not restricted
to their land masses. The problem
is global and demands collective
action on a global scale.
The need for collective action
was first noted at a U.N. “Earth
Summit” in 1992, which called for
all its members to curb their

emissions of greenhouse gases.
Many governments have developed
environmental policies and
strategies for implementing those
policies. Regulation in the form of
punishments, such as fines for
excessive production of pollutants,
is one solution, but it is difficult to
set emissions quotas that are fair to
all businesses concerned. The fines
are also difficult to enforce.
Another option, which was first
suggested by British economist
Arthur Pigou in 1920, is the
imposition of taxes on pollution
(p.137). Levying taxes on firms that
emit greenhouse gases, and on
energy suppliers and producers for
the amount of carbon they release
into the atmosphere, would act
as a disincentive to pollute.
Taxes on fossil fuels would
discourage their excessive
consumption. Pigou’s idea is to
make individuals face the full
social costs of their actions, to
“internalize” the externality.

Carbon-trading schemes
Pollution can be viewed as a market
failure because normally there is no
market for it. Economists suggest
that if there was, the socially optimal

William Nordhaus devised a computer program called DICE to show
how the elements of climate change interact, and where the ecological and
financial costs lie. This financial modeling system allows governments to
factor in their current consumption, resources, and needs, and weigh up
the costs and benefits—to them and the Earth—of the choices available.


Price-type approaches
like harmonized taxes
on carbon are powerful
tools for coordinating
policies and slowing
global warming.
William Nordhaus

Carbon in atmosphere

Temperature
rises


Damage
to nature

Emissions
and absorption
from nature

Emissions
from industry

NATURAL
RESOURCES

INDUSTRY

PEOPLE

Emissions from
consumption

Greenhouse
gases trap heat

C
on
su
mp
tion Consu

m

pt

io

n

La

bo

r
Free download pdf