82
T
he ideas of the renowned
18th-century British
economist David Ricardo
were clearly shaped by the world he
inhabited and by his personal life.
He lived in London, England, at a
time when mercantilism (pp.34–35)
was the dominant economic view.
This held that international trade
should be heavily restricted. As a
result governments introduced
policies that aimed to increase
exports and decrease imports in
an attempt to enrich the nation
through an inflow of gold. In
England the policy dated back to
Elizabethan times. Ricardo thought
that in the long run such protectionist
policies were more likely to restrict
the ability of the country to increase
its wealth.
Early trade protection
Ricardo was particularly concerned
by the introduction of a British tax
known as the Corn Laws. During
the Napoleonic Wars (1803–15) it
was not possible to import wheat
from Europe so the price of wheat
in Britain had risen. As a result
many landowners increased the
proportion of their lands dedicated
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
to growing crops. However, as the
war temporarily came to an end in
1802, the price threatened to fall
back so the landowners—who also
controlled Parliament—passed
Corn Laws to restrict the importation
of foreign wheat and place a “floor,”
a bottom price, on grain. When the
wars ended in 1813, the Corn Laws
were used to raise the floor price
again. The laws protected farmers
but also pushed the price of bread
beyond what poorer people could
pay at a time when newly returned
soldiers and sailors were unable
to find work.
IN CONTEXT
FOCUS
Global economy
KEY THINKER
David Ricardo (1772–1823)
BEFORE
433 BCE The Athenians impose
trade sanctions on the
Megarians in one of the first
recorded trade wars.
1549 John Hales, an English
politician, expresses the
widely held view that free
trade is bad for the country.
AFTER
1965 US economist Mancur
Olson shows that governments
respond more to the appeal of
a concentrated group than one
that is more dispersed.
1967 Swedish economists
Bertil Ohlin and Eli Heckscher
develop Ricardo’s trade theory
to examine how a comparative
advantage might change
over time.
Making a product entails
costs. One of these costs
is time.
Trade is
beneficial for all.
Even if Country A
can do everything better
than Country B, it will profit
most by focusing on the
things it does best. It is
too costly to sacrifice time
on something it does
less well.
Both countries benefit
from a comparative
advantage, which makes the
most efficient use of their
time and resources.
This allows Country B,
which is good (but not
the world’s best) at making
the products Country A
does not make, a chance
to make them without
undue competition.
Overall, more goods are
produced, giving consumers
a wider range of products
at lower prices.