The Philosophy Book

(nextflipdebug2) #1

90


T


he opinions of people today
are still divided into those
that hold that the universe
had a beginning, and those that
hold that it has always existed.
Today we tend to look to physics
and astronomy for an answer, but
in the past this was a question for
philosophers and theologians. The
answer given by the Catholic priest
and philosopher Thomas Aquinas,
the most famous of all medieval
Christian philosophers, is especially
interesting. It is still a plausible
way of thinking about the problem,
and it also tells us a great deal about
how Aquinas combined his faith
with his philosophical reasoning,
despite their apparent contradictions.

Aristotle’s influence
The central figure in Aquinas’s
thinking is Aristotle, the ancient
Greek philosopher whose work was
intensively studied by medieval
thinkers. Aristotle was certain that
the universe has always existed,
and that it has always been home
to different things, from inanimate
objects like rocks, to living species,
such as humans, dogs, and horses.
He argued that the universe is
changing and moving, and this

Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas was born in
1225 at Roccasecca in Italy. He
studied at the University of
Naples and then joined the
Dominican order (a new, highly
intellectual order of friars) against
the wishes of his family. As a
novitiate he studied in Paris and
then in Cologne under the German
Aristotelian theologian, Albert
the Great. Returning to Paris, he
became Master (professor) of
theology, before leaving to travel
around Italy teaching for 10 years.
Unusually, Aquinas was then
offered a second period of tenure
as Master at Paris. In 1273 he

experienced something that
has been considered both some
sort of vision and a possible
stroke; after it, he said that all
he had done was “mere straw”,
and he never wrote again. He
died at the age of 49, and was
recognized as a saint by the
Catholic Church in 1323.

Key works

1256–59 Disputed Questions on
Truth
c.1265–74 Summa Theologica
1271 On the Eternity of the
Universe

IN CONTEXT


BRANCH
Metaphysics

APPROACH
Christian Aristotelian

BEFORE
c.340 BCE Aristotle says that
the universe is eternal.

c.540 CE John Philoponus
argues that the universe must
have a beginning.

1250s–60s French theologians
adopt Philoponus’s argument.

AFTER
1290s French philosopher
Henry of Ghent criticizes
Aquinas, saying the universe
cannot have always existed.

1781 Immanuel Kant claims
he can show that the universe
has always existed, and that
it has not always existed.

1931 Belgian priest and
scientist Georges Lemaître
proposes the “Big Bang” theory
of the origins of the universe.

THOMAS AQUINAS


can only be caused by change and
motion. So there could never have
been a first change or motion: the
universe must have been moving
and changing for ever.
The great Arabic philosophers,
Avicenna and Averroes, were
willing to accept Aristotle’s view,
even though it put them at odds
with Islamic orthodoxy. Medieval
Jewish and Christian thinkers,
however, struggled to do so. They
held that, according to the Bible,
the universe has a beginning, so
Aristotle must be wrong: the
universe has not always existed.
But was this view something that
had to be accepted on faith, or
could it be refuted by reasoning?
John Philoponus, a Greek
Christian writer of the 6th century,
believed that he had found an
argument to show that Aristotle
must be wrong, and that the
universe had not always existed.
His reasoning was copied and
developed by a number of thinkers
in the 13th century, who needed to
find a flaw in Aristotle’s reasoning
in order to protect the teachings of
the Church. Their line of argument
was especially clever, because it
took Aristotle’s own ideas about
Free download pdf