Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 173and, ifA∈g,XA:C∞ 0 (G;C)→C 0 ∞(G;C) is the smooth vector field overG(a
smooth differential operator) defined as:
(XA(f)) (g) := lim
t→ 0f(exp{−tA}g)−f(g)
t∀g∈G. (2.106)so that that map
gA→XA (2.107)defines a representation ofgin terms of vector fields (differential operators) on
C∞ 0 (G;C). We conclude with the following theorem[ 24 ], establishing that the
G ̊arding space has all the expected properties.
Theorem 2.3.73.Referring to Definitions 2.3.71 and 2.3.72, the G ̊arding space
D(GU)satisfies the following properties.
(a)D(GU)is dense inH.(b)Ifg∈G,thenUg(D(GU))⊂D(GU).Moreprecisely,iff∈C 0 ∞(G),x∈H,
g∈G, it holds
Ugx[f]=x[Lgf]. (2.108)(c)IfA∈g,thenDG(U)⊂D(A)and furthermoreA(D(GU))⊂D(GU).More
precisely−iAx[f]=x[XA(f)]. (2.109)
(d)The map
gA→−iA|D(U)
G=:U(A) (2.110)
is a Lie algebra representation in terms of antisymmetric operators defined
on the common dense invariant domainD(GU).Inparticularif{,}is the
Lie commutator ofgwe have:
[U(A),U(A′)] =U({A,A′}) ifA,A′∈g.
(e)D(GU)is a core for every selfadjoint generatorAwithA∈g, that is
A=A|D(U)
G, ∀A∈g. (2.111)Now we tackle the inverse problem: We suppose a certain representation of a Lie
algebragin terms of symmetric operators defined in common invariant domain
of a complex Hilbert spaceH. We are interested in lifting this representation to
a whole strongly continuous representation of the unique simply connected Lie