Phonetic Detail in the Perception of Ethnic Varieties of US English 317
Table 13.9 Univariate Results of Canonical Discriminant Analysis
Variable F p r^2
Acoustics (df = 2, 27)
/ܭ/ F3-F2 (Z) 25.61 0.0001 0.655
/o/ F2 (Z) 16.98 0.0001 0.557
RMS Standard Deviation 11.57 0.0002 0.462
/ܭ/ F1 (Z) 4.11 0.0276 0.234
Maximum Flow Declination Rate 1.51 0.2395 0.101
RMS Initial Value 1.14 0.3361 0.078
Perception (df = 2, 27)
/o/ F2 (Hz) 11.26 0.0003 0.455
/ܭ/ F1 (Z) 5.12 0.0130 0.275
/ܭ/ F3-F2 (Z) 4.65 0.0184 0.256
Change in RMS 3.31 0.0518 0.197
/o/ F3-F1 (Z) 0.76 0.4760 0.054
Table 13.10 Multivariate Results of Canonical Discriminant Analysis
Group Squared Distance Between Means F Squared Canonical Coef¿ cients Eigenvalue
Acoustics (df = 6, 22)
AAE—ChE 31.42 21.34*
AAE—SAE 31.34 21.28*
ChE—SAE 17.25 11.72*
CAN1 0.870 6.683
CAN2 0.762 3.195†
Perception (df =5,23)
AAE—ChE 15.48 9.50*
AAE—SAE 5.76 4.21*
ChE—SAE 15.20 14.56*
CAN1 0.768 0.768 3.309
CAN2 0.473 0.473 0.896†
*p<0.01
†cumulative eigenvalue = 1.000