New York Post - 13.03.2020

(Ben Green) #1

New York Post, Friday, March 13, 2020


nypost.com


CASHING OUT

N


o group of major league
athletes in North America is
more vulnerable to the eco-
nomic ramifications of the coro-
navirus’ impact on sports than
hockey players.
That is why I believe the NHL,
with substantial input from the
NHL Players’ Association, will
attempt to be as creative as possi-
ble in either saving some remain-
ing portion of the regular season
that would precede a somewhat
traditional playoff format or in
creating an expanded playoff
tournament.
Because generating revenue is
critical not only to the athletes’
short-term needs, but for the
long-term sustainability of the
NHL’s hard-cap league. How ugly
do you think it will get if the cap
is reduced next season because
of this pandemic?

According to individuals with
ties to both management and la-
bor, it was unclear as of Thurs-
day evening whether teams
would continue to pay players
during the “pause” in the season
that was announced Thursday
afternoon.
“No details about anything,
yet,” one front office executive
texted, while an agent said, “Ha-
ven’t been told.”
Section 17 of the Standard
Player’s Contract grants teams
permission to withhold pay if the
NHL, “suspend[s], cease[s] or re-
duce[s] operations ... because of
any condition arising from a state
of war or other cause beyond the
control of the League ...”
But the NHL, run by attorneys
who understand the meaning of
terminology, chose to use the
word, “pause,” rather than, “sus-
pend.” And we are told there are
those within the NHLPA who be-
lieve that the teams will be obli-
gated to continue paying their
players on a twice-monthly basis
through the
scheduled end
of the season on
April 4.
The problem for the players is
that even if they do get paid dur-
ing the shutdown, they’d likely
have to return all of it if the
league does not reopen or cannot
generate commensurate revenues
upon reopening. The players are
locked into a 50-50 partnership
with the league. Approximately
15 percent of the regular season
remains with 100 percent of post-
season revenue outstanding.
If the season is not resumed, or
if revenues do not meet projec-
tions upon reopening, then not
only would players likely receive
no refund of the 14 percent es-
crow deduction that has been ap-

plied to their paychecks this sea-
son, they’d all but certainly wind
up giving money back to the
league to correspond to a 50-50
split.
This is what partnership is all
about.
Next year’s
cap is based on a
formula that re-
lies on this
year’s revenue. If the season is
canceled, the league and union
could agree to set the cap at, say,
this year’s $81.5 million number if
both parties envision an immedi-
ate rebound to traditional con-
sumer habits and ticket-buying
behavior.
But maybe not. Regardless of a
bargained number, no one should
expect the PA to use an escalator.
And a flat cap — if that — would
wreak havoc on the league in
which half of the teams are using
long-term injury exemptions to
be cap compliant.
Indeed, there is a possibility
the league and union could adopt

an amnesty buyout policy for this
offseason in which buyouts are
not applied against the cap, as
was the case coming out of each
of the past two Owners’ Lock-
outs.
In this league, it is all about the
cap and to a huge number of
players in the union, it is all
about escrow. Which is why, if
pro sports return to somewhat
normal within the next two-to-
three months, the NHL is going
to want and need to generate a
splash for the playoffs to gener-
ate excitement and revenue.
Hard to work up enthusiasm for a
May 14, Game 81 between say, the
Ducks and Kings.
Which is why I can envision
adoption of an expanded tourna-
ment, including perhaps 20-24
teams, featuring knockout
rounds and whatever other bells
and whistles the league could
create in order to attract interest
across the continent. As the Red
Wings are the only team to have
been eliminated from playoff

contention, the league could
adopt a 30-team invitational.
This would obviously not be
about the integrity of the compe-
tition — and why would it be
now, when it never is? — but
about maximizing revenue. Hey,
maybe bid out the final or the fi-
nal two rounds to a neutral site
willing to pay enormous spon-
sorship dollars for the tourna-
ment. The final, you realize,
could be played in the middle of
July.
The NFL moved to a 16-team
Super Bowl tournament follow-
ing its 1982 strike season. Things
like this can be done. More play-
off teams, more playoff games,
more playoff revenue, healthier
cap.
Of course, nobody knows. But
we do know that the NHL, which
was the second pro league to an-
nounce a “pause,” is also the
league that would be affected the
most seriously if forced to cancel
it all.
[email protected]

Larry Brooks


CORONAVIRUS


IN HOCKEY


Where they’re at


The current NHL standings

EASTERN
CONFERENCE

PLAYOFF GLANCE

METROPOLITAN DIVISION
POS. TEAM PTS GR
M1 Capitals 90 13
M2 Flyers 89 13
M3 Penguins 86 13

ATLANTIC DIVISION
POS. TEAM PTS GR
A1 Bruins 100 12
A2 Lightning 92 12
A3 MapleLeafs 81 12

WILDCARD
POS. TEAM PTS GR
WC1 Hurricanes 81 14
WC2 Blue Jackets 81 12
Islanders 80 14
Rangers 79 12
Panthers 78 13
Canadiens 71 11

FIRST-ROUND MATCHUPS
(As of this point)

M1 Capitalsvs. WC1 Hurricanes
M2 Flyersvs. M3 Penguins
A1 Bruinsvs. WC2 Blue Jackets
A2 Lightningvs. A3 MapleLeafs

WESTERN
CONFERENCE
CENTRAL DIVISION
POS. TEAM PTS GR
C1 Blues 94 11
C2 Avalanche 92 12
C3 Stars 82 13
PACIFIC DIVISION
POS. TEAM PTS GR
P1 G. Knights 86 11
P2 Oilers 83 11
P3 Flames 79 12
WILDCARD
POS. TEAM PTS GR
WC1 Jets 80 11
WC2 Predators 78 13
Canucks 78 13
Wild 77 13

FIRST-ROUND MATCHUPS
(As of this point)
C1 Bluesvs. W2 Predators
C2 Avalanchevs. C3 Stars
P1 G. Knightsvs. WC1 Jets
P2 Oilersvs. P3 Flames

Packing up: Brady Munger, the assistant equipment manager of the Red Wings, gets his team’s gear
together after Thursday’s game against the Capitals was postponed. Getty Images
Free download pdf