The Washington Post - 22.02.2020

(avery) #1

saturday, february 22 , 2020. the washington post eZ sU A


California and throughout the
nation arriving at a similar con-
clusion. He hopes they will look
past this week’s feeble debate
performance, ignore his history
as a Republican and tune out the
allegations of misogyny and ra-
cial insensitivities in his past —
deciding that the imperative to
defeat Trump is so great that they
can persuade themselves to love
the multibillionaire simply be-
cause he’s a multibillionaire.
Bloomberg, who founded a
media and information company
that bears his name, is worth an
estimated $60 billion and has
pledged to spend whatever it
takes to win. He has been a
candidate for just three months,
but his campaign has reported
spending a staggering $464 mil-
lion through Feb. 1 — $ 259 mil-
lion of that on television advertis-
ing.
Bloomberg’s candidacy is chal-
lenging the adage in politics that
buying your way into office is a
net negative. Instead, Bloomberg
is pitching his wealth as one of
his greatest assets.
“I’m a philanthropist who

didn’t inherit his money but
made his money, and I’m spend-
ing that money to get rid of
Donald Tr ump, the worst presi-
dent we have ever had,”
Bloomberg said in Wednesday
night’s debate. “A nd if I can get
that done, it will be a great
contribution to America and to
my kids.”
The other Democratic candi-
dates ascribed darker motives to
Bloomberg. Pete Buttigieg, the
former mayor of South Bend,
Ind., said Bloomberg “thinks he
can buy this election.”
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)
blasted Bloomberg for embody-
ing “a corrupt political system”
and warned that “real change
never takes place from the top on
down, never takes place from an
oligarchy controlled by billion-
aires.”
And Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(Mass.) likened Bloomberg to
Trump, warning that “Democrats
take a huge risk if we just substi-
tute one arrogant billionaire for
another.”
Ye t here in California, where
recent polls show Sanders lead-

ing the field and Bloomberg ris-
ing into contention, one likely
primary voter after another said
they were warming to the former
New York mayor.
As he was getting off work at a
shopping mall in Stockton, Mi-
chael Rabago, 25, said that he
wants more than anything to
deny Trump a second term — and
that Bloomberg’s billions make
him the guy to do it.
“Money buys votes, and I just
hope Trump doesn’t win again,”
Rabago said. “I think it’s going to
take a rich guy to beat Trump. I
personally want Bernie to win,
but money is everything. That’s
sad to say, but that’s how it is. I
always see Bloomberg’s commer-
cials on TV: ‘Mike for 2020.’ ”
Faidrian Smith, 49, said she
has decided to vote for
Bloomberg for a simple reason:
“If you don’t have the money to
fight him, Trump is going to win
the election. Period.”
Smith, who is black and works
as a driver for a food-delivery
service, said as she dashed into a
restaurant here to pick up a
customer’s order that she feels a

BY COLBY ITKOWITZ
AND MICHAEL SCHERER

Former New York mayor Mike
Bloomberg said Friday that his
company will release from their
nondisclosure agreements three
women who have accused him of
making offensive comments, a
decision that comes after days of
pressure from fellow presiden-
tial candidates.
Bloomberg, w ho is r unning f or
the Democratic presidential
nomination, also said that after
“a lot of reflecting,” he will not
propose confidential agreements
to resolve sexual misconduct
claims in the future.
“I recognize that NDAs, partic-
ularly when they are used in the
context of sexual harassment
and sexual assault, promote a
culture of silence in the work-
place and contribute to a culture
of women not feeling safe or


supported,” Bloomberg said in a
statement.
Bloomberg said his media and
financial services company had
identified three NDAs that “ad-
dress complaints about com-
ments” h e had made. T he women
at t he center of those a greements
can ask to be released if they
would like to speak publicly,
Bloomberg said.
It is unlikely that Bloomberg’s
release applies to any women
who have ever accused the com-
pany or other employees of ha-
rassment or misconduct. It is
also unclear how many NDAs
Bloomberg’s company h as signed
over the past 30 years.
Bonnie Josephs, a New York
City lawyer who initially repre-
sented a former Bloomberg em-
ployee in a sexual harassment
case, criticized Bloomberg’s deci-
sion as too narrow.
“This is ridiculous. What it

appears he’s doing is responding
only to the people who have
complained about him personal-
ly,” she said. “In my opinion, he
can’t separate that out. He’s the
boss. He’s the owner. It’s his
shop, and if it happens in his
shop, it’s on his watch. It doesn’t
matter if it wasn’t him. He sets
the tone.”
Josephs represented Sekiko
Sakai Garrison, a former
Bloomberg employee who filed
the m ost high-profile suit against
him alleging that he told her to
“kill it” when he learned she was
pregnant, which Garrison took
as a reference to abortion.
Garrison also said Bloomberg
once told her and other female
employees to line up and give
oral sex as a present to a male
colleague who was getting mar-
ried.
Garrison settled her case for a
sum in the six figures, three

sources have told The Post.
The NDA issue has dogged
Bloomberg for nearly a week,
since The Washington Post pub-
lished a story that detailed de-
cades of discrimination lawsuits
and claims of sexism against
Bloomberg’s company, including
one from a former employee that
directly blamed Bloomberg for
creating a culture that permitted
sexual harassment and degrada-
tion of women.
Unlike President Trump,
Bloomberg has not been accused
of sexual misconduct, but in-
stead he’s been sued for sexually
inappropriate comments that
plaintiffs say fostered a hostile
workplace culture for women.
At Wednesday’s Democratic
debate in Las Vegas, Sen. Eliza-
beth Warren (D-Mass.) ham-
mered Bloomberg on the issue,
calling on him to release the
women from nondisclosure

agreements.
Bloomberg initially down-
played it, saying “none of them
accuse me of doing anything,
other t han maybe they d idn’t like
a joke I told.”
“There’s agreements between
two parties that w anted t o keep it
quiet and that’s up to them,” he
added. “ They signed those agree-
ments, and we’ll live with it.”
The next night, Warren goad-
ed him with an NDA release f orm
she drafted and said he just
needed to sign.
In internal campaign discus-
sions, Bloomberg said Warren’s
attacks changed his thinking on
the issue, according to a person
familiar with Bloomberg who
spoke on the condition of ano-
nymity to discuss campaign de-
liberations.
Rather than approach the
question as a CEO focused on the
sanctity of legal agreements,

Bloomberg realized he had to
approach the issue as a presiden-
tial candidate, this person said.
Shortly after Bloomberg’s
statement on Friday, Warren said
it was “not good enough.”
“Michael Bloomberg needs to
do a blanket release, so that all
the women who have been muz-
zled by nondisclosure agree-
ments can step up and tell their
side of the story,” she said. “If he
wants to be the Democratic nom-
inee, and he wants to be the
president of the United States,
then he’s going to have to be fully
transparent on this issue. We
cannot have a leader of our party
who selectively decides who gets
to tell about their history with
him.”
[email protected]
[email protected]

elise Viebeck and Michael Kranish
contributed to this report.

Bloomberg says his business will release three women from their NDAs


BY PHILIP RUCKER

STOCKTON, Calif. — Mike
Bloomberg’s rivals for the Demo-
cratic presidential nomination
clamor that the White House is
not for sale — not even for a buyer
worth $60 billion. On the debate
stage as well as the campaign
trail, they castigate him as an
out-of-touch plutocrat unfairly
injecting hundreds of millions of
dollars into the political system
to manipulate democracy.
Ye t here in Stockton, a central
California crossroads where low-
wage warehouse workers feel left
out of the economic boom and
the bustling immigrant commu-
nity has been under siege by
President Trump’s crackdown,
voters have a different take on
Bloomberg’s wealth.
Many Democrats here said
they didn’t know that much
about the former New York may-
or until he started popping up on
television in recent weeks. But
after an unprecedented advertis-
ing blitz in the run-up to the
March 3 Super Tuesday contests
— when California’s primary will
be the biggest prize of all — they
have begun repeating
Bloomberg’s slogan: “Mike will
get it done.”
Lynn Silva, 66, a retired spe-
cial-education instructor for in-
carcerated adults, is a lifelong
Democrat. The Trump era has
made her so anxious and so
worried for the country that she
can no longer stand to listen to
the television when t he president
is speaking. Her list of favorites
to run against him is long and
ever-changing, but she is starting
to conclude that Bloomberg,
hardly her first choice to be the
Democratic standard-bearer,
may be “the ultimate candidate”
for a coldly calculated reason: He
has the money to win.
“I don’t care that he’s a billion-
aire trying to buy the election,”
she said. “If that’s what it takes to
beat Trump, that’s fine. I loved
[Sen. Kamala D. Harris], but look
at her: Out. I loved [Sen.] Cory
Booker, but look at him: Out. No
money.”
“These aren’t regular times,”
Silva added. “We’ve got to get
Trump out. That’s the bottom
line.”
Bloomberg is banking, literal-
ly, on Democratic voters across


personal imperative to defeat
Trump.
“He’s made racism so blunt
and in-your-face now, and we
have to change that,” Smith said.
“I’m not saying Mike Bloomberg
should buy the election. But
money helps. It m akes him stron-
ger.”
Bloomberg’s wealth was a
turnoff for some other voters
here. Diana Gatewood, 61, a re-
tired special-needs care worker,
said: “He’s trying to buy our
votes. It d oes take money to make
the world go around, but just
because he’s a billionaire doesn’t
mean he’s doing right by people.”
Gatewood said she has not
decided whom to vote for in the
March 3 primary, but she’s lean-
ing toward Sanders, Sen. Amy
Klobuchar (Minn.) and To m Stey-
er, another billionaire who is
self-funding his campaign but
has had far more limited success
than Bloomberg.
Synthia, 57, a retired parole
officer who declined to provide
her last name for fear of political
retribution, acknowledged that
Bloomberg’s b illions would p rove
helpful in the general election
but said she was disinclined to
vote for him.
“How does he help the people
— the underdogs, the working-
class, the blue-collar?” s he asked.
“I think he’s playing a political
game.... We’re not pawns in a
game. We’re people with lives. At
the end of the day, we go home to
our bills and our stressors, and
these billionaires go home to
their rich lives.”
Bloomberg has a prominent
and enthusiastic champion here
in Michael Tubbs, Stockton’s dy-
namic young black mayor and a
self-described liberal Democrat.
Tubbs, 29, was elected mayor
on the same night in 2016 that
Trump was elected president,
and he quickly began to fully
comprehend what Trump’s presi-
dency meant for his city of about
311,000.
In his first few months as
mayor, Tubbs said, he spent most
of his time not on crime or roads
or other typical municipal mat-
ters, but on immigration — spe-
cifically, trying to reassure his
constituents, roughly one-third
of whom are foreign-born, that
despite the president’s rhetoric
and the harsh crackdown on

illegal immigration that he au-
thorized, they would continue to
have sanctuary in Stockton.
“Donald Trump is literally an
existential threat,” Tubbs said.
“Their way of life, their way of
being, their way of interacting in
the community has been changed
by his presidency, and the top
priority has to be to get him out.”
Tubbs described Stockton as a
microcosm of America, a diverse
melting pot in which 45 percent
of residents are white and the
median household income is just
$51,000, a ccording to U.S. Census
Bureau data. The city is a trans-
portation and logistics hub,
meaning many jobs here pay low
wages, at least relative to Silicon
Valley and California’s other
booming metropolises.
Tubbs is a sort-of Bloomberg
protege. He graduated from a
Harvard University mayoral
training program that
Bloomberg funds and said he
tries to model his use of data in
running Stockton’s municipal af-
fairs after Bloomberg’s adminis-
tration in New York.
As he considered which candi-
date to support for president,
Tubbs first gravitated toward
Harris, one of his home state’s
Democratic senators. But once
she was out of the race, he eyed
Bloomberg, who agreed to make
Stockton his first stop in Califor-
nia as a candidate.
Since Bloomberg’s visit here in
December, Tubbs has been an
evangelist for his candidacy, ex-
plaining to his working- and
middle-class constituents why
they should put their faith in a
Manhattan billionaire.
“I tell people, ‘Beating Donald
Trump is the top priority,’ ” Tubbs
said. “Donald Trump and the
Republican Party are playing to
win.” By nominating one of the
other candidates, Tubbs argued,
Democrats would be “unilateral-
ly disarming” in the face of
Trump’s campaign war chest.
“You can’t beat Donald Trump
with no money,” Tubbs said. “It’s
just not happening. You’re going
to have to have the resources to
compete and also to build up the
infrastructure in states so that
something like Donald Trump
doesn’t happen again, and
Bloomberg has shown a willing-
ness to do that.”
[email protected]

Some voters warm to Bloomberg’s much-maligned wealth


toni L. sandys/the Washington Post
Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg makes a call from his campaign headquarters on
Jan. 28. Other candidates have castigated the former New York mayor as an out-of-touch plutocrat.

BY JOSH DAWSEY,
TOM HAMBURGER
AND CAROL D. LEONNIG

President Trump has directly
weighed in on the White House
review of a forthcoming book by
his former national security a dvis-
er, telling his staff that he views
John Bolton as “a traitor,” that
everything he uttered to the de-
parted aide about national securi-
ty i s classified and that he w ill seek
to block the book’s publication,
according to two people familiar
with the conversations.
T he president’s private argu-
ments stand in contrast to the
point-by-point process used to
classify and protect sensitive se-
crets and appears to differ from
the White House’s public posture
toward Bolton’s m uch-anticipated
memoir. The National Security
Council warned B olton last month
that his draft “appears to contain
significant amounts of classified
information,” s ome of i t top secret,
but pledged to help him revise the
manuscript and “ move forward as
expeditiously as possible.”
“We will do our best to work
with you to ensure your client’s
ability to tell h is story in a m anner


that protects U. S. national securi-
ty,” E llen Knight, senior director of
the council’s records office, wrote
in a Jan. 23 letter to Bolton’s attor-
ney.
B ut the president has insisted
to aides that Bolton’s account of
his work in Trump’s White House,
“The Room Where It Happened,”
should not see the light of day
before the November election, ac-
cording to the two people familiar
with the c onversations, who spoke
on the condition of anonymity to
discuss internal White House de-
liberations.
Trump has told his lawyers that
Bolton should not be allowed to
publish any of his interactions
with him about national security
because they are privileged and
classified, these people said. He
has a lso r epeatedly b rought up t he
book with his t eam, a sking wheth-
er Bolton is going to be able to
publish it, t hey said.
Trump told national television
anchors on Feb. 4 during an off-
the-record lunch that material in
the book was “highly classified,”
according to notes from one par-
ticipant in the luncheon. He then
called h im a “traitor.”
“We’re going to try and block

the publication of the book,”
Trump said, according to the
notes. “A fter I leave office, he can
do this. But not in the White
House.”
“I give the guy a break. I give
him a job. And then he turns on
me,” Trump added during the
West Wing lunch. “He’s just mak-
ing things up.”
Bolton’s book has promised to
unveil key first-person moments
between Bolton and Trump that
were at t he heart o f the president’s
handling of Ukraine, a saga that
led to his impeachment by the
House.
In a recent appearance at Van-
derbilt University, former Obama
national security adviser Susan E.
Rice attacked Bolton for failing to
testify in the impeachment hear-
ings and said she “couldn’t imag-
ine” withholding critical informa-
tion from the American people to
preserve it for a book. Bolton in-
sisted his testimony would not
have changed the Senate’s im-
peachment acquittal.
As t he Senate launched a trial in
late January o n the House’s c harg-
es that Trump abused t he power of
his office and obstructed Con-
gress, the New York Times report-

ed it had learned a key detail al-
leged b y Bolton in his manuscript:
that Trump told h im he was condi-
tioning the release of military aid
to Ukraine on whether its govern-
ment would help investigate for-
mer vice president Joe Biden and
his son.
Trump responded to that story
on Jan. 27 by tweeting that he
“NEVER t old John Bolton t hat aid
to Ukraine was tied to investiga-
tions into the Bidens or Demo-
crats.”
Democrats demanded that Bol-
ton be summoned to testify in the
Senate trial, but Republicans re-
jected those calls.
A person close to Bolton s aid h e
has grown concerned in recent
weeks that the White House has
appeared t o claim t hat broad cate-
gories of topics are classified,
without clearly identifying or ar-
ticulating the reasons for that lev-
el of p rotection. A s eparate person
close to Bolton said the t eam antic-
ipates t he possibility of a long l egal
battle over t he issue.
Bolton’s lawyer, Charles J. Coo-
per, declined to comment Friday
on the claim of classified material
and t he president’s p ledge to block
the b ook’s r elease.

“The NSC’s pre-publication re-
view of Ambassador Bolton’s m an-
uscript is proceeding,” Cooper
said. “Ambassador Bolton is con-
tinuing to pursue it in good faith.
We have nothing to say beyond
that.”
In m any ways, Bolton r emains a
captive of t he White House r eview
process. He has earned a reported
seven-figure advance for his ac-
count from publisher Simon &
Schuster, which has planned to
release the b ook o n March 17.
But Bolton would take a huge
legal risk — including the p ossibil-
ity of a criminal investigation — if
he published h is m anuscript w ith-
out the National Security Coun-
cil’s f inal approval.
There is precedent to give Bol-
ton and his lawyers reason to
pause. A former Navy SEAL wrote
a 2012 book about his role in the
raid that killed Osama bin Laden,
triggering a Justice Department
criminal investigation into allega-
tions he published classified de-
tails of his work and training as a
special operator.
In a 2016 settlement, Matt Bis-
sonnette, who wrote “No Easy
Day” under the pen name Mark
Owen, agreed to turn over to the

government all the profits and fu-
ture royalties stemming from his
book — which amounted to at
least $6.6 million at the time. As
part of the deal, Bissonnette ac-
knowledged he failed to get his
manuscript properly cleared by
the Pentagon. In exchange, the
Justice Department agreed to dis-
miss any other claims and drop
any plans to prosecute h im for t he
release of classified information.
Robert Luskin, the lawyer who
represented Bissonnette after he
came under investigation, said
Bolton can challenge the White
House review but it is u nclear h ow
he might fare.
“ The challenge for Bolton is that
the president has pretty broad
power to classify or declassify; but
once the manuscript has actually
been submitted for review, Bolton
would have the right to challenge
undue delay or purely capricious
or vindictive exercises of the gov-
ernment’s authority to review and
require changes,” Luskin said. “He
could get judicial review, but the
process would not be fast and the
rules n ot especially clear. ”
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Trump, claiming conversations are classified, wants to block Bolton’s book

Free download pdf