The Economist 29Feb2020

12 The EconomistFebruary 29th 2020

Lettersarewelcomeandshouldbe

addressedtotheEditorat

TheEconomist,TheAdelphiBuilding,

1-11 JohnAdamStreet,LondonWC 2 N 6 HT

Email:[email protected]

Morelettersareavailableat:

Economist.com/letters

Letters

Purpose-driven business

Last year you asked, “What are

companies for?” (August 24th

2019) and concluded that they

should stick to business-as-

usual in the form of share-

holder primacy. This month

you repeated this message,

telling chief executives to

“forget trying to run the world”

and focus on serving the long-

term interests of their business

owners (“Meet the new boss”,

February 8th). Your consisten-

cy is laudable. However, this

position ignores the adverse

impact of market failures and

the shareholder-first model

that has contributed so much

to our social and environ-

mental crises, not least the

existential threat of climate

change.

Fortunately a growing

number of companies out

there recognise that this

threatens the viability and

legitimacy of business. They

know that their purpose needs

to include creating the long-

term social and environmental

capital that underpins their

shareholder returns, and that

this is in their own immediate

interests in attracting and

motivating talent, driving

innovation, building trust and

increasing performance.

This is a crucial year in

which world leaders will ex-

plore a new deal for nature at

the Convention on Biodiversity

in China, and seek agreement

on reaching net zero carbon

emissions by 2050. Unless

business plays a key role in

tackling the world’s greatest

challenges, it will certainly

discover the true meaning of

“disruption” on a global scale.

dame polly courtice

Director

Institute for Sustainability

Leadership

University of Cambridge

You suggest that today’s bosses

must “be physically fit to with-

stand the brutal workload”

(“Take me to a leader”, February

8th). This is a modern preju-

dice. Is there any evidence that

fitter bosses are higher per-

forming? Sergio Marchionne

and Herb Kelleher were chain-

smokers who transformed

theirindustries(carsand

airlines).BillGatespossibly

skipscross-fit.AndWarren

Buffettproudlyclaimstoeat

“likea six-year-old”.Beingfitis

goodinitself,butthereisno

concreteconclusionthatceos

absolutelyneedtobehighly

athletic.Goodlooksaresurely

a powerfulhaloeffect,butlet’s

notbarbread-eatersfromthe

corporatesuitejustyet.

conalcampbell

Celbridge,Ireland

Genderpreferences

TheFreeexchangeonsocial

normswasmuddled(February

8th).Apparentlygenderearn-

ingsdisparitiespersistbut

(andthisseemstodisturbyou)

theymaypartlyreflectdiffer-

entpreferencesbymenand

women.Butlook,thecolumn

says,preferencestoocanbe

changed;theyare“socially

determined”.

Whyshouldpolicymakers,

nevermindeconomists,want

tochangethesepreferences?

What,exactly,iswrongwith

womentendingtopreferchil-

drenandhomeandmenpre-

ferringworkandcareer?Econ-

omistslauddivisionoflabour

inotherbusinesses,whynotin

thefamilyalso?Justwhat

principleliesbehindtheidea

thatmenandwomenshould

haveidenticalpreferences?

professorjohnstaddon

DepartmentofPsychologyand

Neuroscience

DukeUniversity

Durham,NorthCarolina

Free speech in Qatar

Your article on Qatar did not

reflect the reality of freedom of

expression in the country and a

law that has been amended to

prevent the spread of false and

malicious information

(“Tamim the gloriously toler-

ant”, February 15th). Similar

legislation exists in many

democratic countries. In

France a law was introduced in

2018 to tackle the manipulation

of information and its deliber-

ate dissemination. As the

target of sustained state-spon-

sored disinformation cam-

paigns, “deep fakes” and cyber-

attacks, Qatar understands the

dangersofinformation

manipulationbetterthan

anyone.Inlinewiththeun’s

covenantoncivilandpolitical

rights,towhichQatarisfully

committed,thisamendment

waspassedasa protection

againstmajor,co-ordinated

hackinganddisinformation

operationstryingtofracture

theregion.It isnotopento

abuseandwillnotlimitex-

pression,speechorreporting

inoraboutQatar.

Nocountryhasdonemore

thanQatartoimprovemedia

freedomintheregion.The

debateonthisamendment

fromwithinQataritself,in-

cludingfromlocalmediaand

social-mediausers,demon-

stratesthatindividualsand

platformscancriticisea law

withoutconsequence.

thameralthani

Deputydirector

GovernmentCommunications

Office

Doha,Qatar

Rememberinga waratrocity

Therearea lotof75thcom-

memorationeventsmarking

thesecondworldwar.One

incidentlessfamousthan

Dresden(“Theinferno”,Febru-

ary8th)wascommemoratedin

theDutchvillageofPuttenlast

year.InearlyOctober1944, 600

menweresenttoGermanwork

campsinretaliationforthe

killingofa Germanofficerby

theresistance.Fewreturned.I

wasonlyfiveatthetimebutI

stillhavevividmemoriesofthe

episode.Lotsofsimilarstories

canbetoldaboutothervillages

inoccupiedEuropethathave

gonemostlyunreported.A

recentnovel,“TheWeeping

WomanofPutten”byAlyce

Bailey,tellsthetale.

walterschuit

TorrejóndeArdoz,Spain

The EU puts Europeans first

The Economistrepeats a myth

that Brexit was about England

turning in on itself, as if sup-

porting membership of the eu

is a sign of internationalism

(Bagehot, February 1st). The

opposite is true. The eucreated

a system that favours other

Europeans over everyone else.

This is most obviously mani-

fest in freedom of movement,

which allows any eucitizen to

move to any eucountry, while

at the same time erecting

barriers against immigration

from outside the eu. Hard-core

Remainers, convinced of their

own enlightened liberalism,

refuse to acknowledge this

gross injustice. Oddly enough,

supposedly xenophobic and

uneducated Brexiteers have no

difficulty understanding the

unfairness and outdated Euro-

centric nature of eupolicies.

nicolas groffman

Reading, Berkshire

Bagehot described Mark Fran-

cois as the “Captain Mainwar-

ing of the European Research

Group of mps”. Mr Francois is

more like Private Walker in

“Dad’s Army”, the black-marke-

teer in Mainwaring’s platoon.

The propaganda espoused by

Mr Francois and his fellow

Brexiteers included assurances

that leaving “won’t cost you

much”, Walker’s favourite line

when plying his trade.

johan enegren

Stockholm

The picture accompanying the

news on Brexit in The world

this week (February 8th)

showed a number of Brexit

supporters waving Union Flags

that were upside down. As this

is a recognised way of signal-

ling distress, are they perhaps

reflecting the belief of many in

the country that trouble lies

ahead?

charles mortelman

London

Table for one

Regarding Bartleby’s “The

number of the best” (January

25th) I have always understood

that the ideal size of a commit-

tee is an odd number less than

three.

peter wilson

Kenilworth, Warwickshire