Financial_Times_UK 28Jan2020

(Dana P.) #1

Tuesday28 January 2020 ★ 15


The Financial Times Limited 2020© Week XX


Companies / Sectors / People


Gazprom has opened a pipeline to
Turkey, settled a spat with Ukraine and
begun to build links to China. But the
Russian state-owned group’s shares
are languishing as it remains at the
mercy of two bigger factors — the
natural gas price and geopolitics.
AnalysisiPAGE 16

Geopolitics weighs on
Russia’s gas superpower

N I C H O L A S M E G AW

Amigo as put itself up for sale lessh
than two years after floating, sending
the subprime lender’s shares crashing
and making it London’s worst-per-
forming big listing in more than three
years.

The company saidyesterday that it had
launcheda “strategic review and formal
sale process” t the instruction of Jamesa
Benamor, its founder, a self-confessed
former petty criminal who briefly
joined the ranks of the world’s billion-
aires when Amigo floated in2018.
The group is the UK’s biggest provider
of so-called guarantor loans — made to
borrowers with bad credit histories but
who have a friend or family member

who will step in if needed. The clamp-
down byregulators onpayday lending
helped usher in a period of rapid growth
that led to Amigo’s flotation.
However, it hascome under increas-
ing scrutiny from regulators. The Finan-
cial Conduct Authority has questioned
whether guarantors comprehend the
risks they are assuming and whether
Amigo’s customers risk becoming
trapped indebt.
Shares in Amigo beganto fall last year,
afterHamish Paton, chief executive,
said he would overhaul its model in
response to the regulatory threat. The
proposed changes included investing to
strengthen its compliance and collec-
tions operations, while reducing its reli-
ance on cheaper repeat borrowers in

favour of chasing new customers.Mr
Patondeparted last Decemberafter Mr
Benamor, who controls 61 per cent of
Amigo, reasserted control and returned
to the board.
The company in November sought to
reassure investors utb esterday said ity
was “concerned that there may be
increased pressure on our business and
a continual evolution in the approach of
the Financial Ombudsman Service”.
Shares in Amigo, which floated at
275p, tumbled 29 per centyesterday, to
48.6p, and aredown 82 per cent since
the IPO.
Amigo said it would consider other
options in addition to a full sale, includ-
ing a disposal of parts of the group.
Lombard and analysis age 19p

Amigo shares tumble 29% after


subprime lender reveals sale plans


Companies
Airbus............................................................. 15
Air France-KLM...................................8,
Air India........................................................ 16
Aisats.............................................................. 16
Alibaba.......................................................... 25
Altran.............................................................. 18
Amazon....................................................16,
Amigo........................................................15,
Antofagasta................................................ 26
Apple.........................................................14,
Arconic.......................................................... 26
Arriva................................................................ 2
Avid Technologies.................................... 3
Bank of America.......................11,16,17,
Barclays........................................................ 26
Barrick Gold................................................ 18
Begbies Traynor....................................... 19
Blackstone..............................................11,
Boeing............................................................17,
Burberry.................................................14,
Canaan.......................................................... 25
Capgemini.................................................... 18
Casper............................................................ 16
ChartIQ.......................................................... 26
Citigroup.................................................17,
Computacenter......................................... 26
Credit Suisse..........................................8,
Cyrus Capital.............................................. 19
DR Horton................................................... 26
Datadog........................................................ 14


Davide Campari-Milano....................... 17
De Beers....................................................... 19
Deutsche Bahn............................................ 2
Devon Equity Management.............. 17
Domino’s Pizza........................................... 8
DuPont............................................................. 8
EHang Holdings...................................... 25
EasyJet............................................................ 8
Ebac................................................................... 3
Elliott Management............................... 18
Ericsson......................................................... 14
Estée Lauder............................................. 26
Facebook.................................................14,
Far Point...................................................... 25
Ferrexpo....................................................... 26
Flybe............................................................... 19
Fortress Investment Group.............. 25
Freeport-McMoRan................................ 18
Gambling.com.............................................. 8
Gazprom....................................................... 16
Geely................................................................. 8
General Motors........................................... 8
Glencore........................................................ 18
Glue42.......................................................... 26
Goldman........................................................ 11
Goldman Sachs........................................ 26
Google.......................................................16,
Gucci............................................................... 14
HSBC..........................................................8,
Honda............................................................... 8
Huawei.......................................................2,
Hudson Bay Capital M’gmt.............. 25

IAG..................................................................... 8
Invesco........................................................... 19
JPMorgan Chase......................11,16,17,
James Benamor........................................ 19
Jupiter............................................................ 17
Kaz Minerals.............................................. 26
Kering.......................................................14,
Kumas Manyezit Sanayi..................... 26
LVMH............................................................. 26
Laredo Petroleum................................... 15
Lizhi.................................................................
Lufthansa....................................................... 8
Lyft................................................................... 14
MGM.................................................................. 8
McDonald’s.................................................... 8
Metinvest Group.................................... 17
Moncler......................................................... 26
Morgan Stanley..............................11,17,
Mosaic Acquisition Corp.................... 25
Naftogaz....................................................... 16
National Oil Corporation.................... 25
NewDay......................................................... 19
Newmont Corporation.......................... 18
Nissan........................................................1,3,
Nokia............................................................... 14
Non-Standard Finance......................... 19
Northern Rail............................................... 2
OpenFin........................................................ 26
PSA.................................................................1,
Partners Group......................................... 25
Peloton........................................................... 16

Petra Diamonds........................................ 19
Prada.............................................................. 26
Provident Financial................................ 19
RHI Magnesita.......................................... 26
Range Resources..................................... 15
Renault...................................................1,8,
Richemont................................................... 26
Rio Tinto...................................................... 26
Rosh Engineering...................................... 3
Royal Bank of Scotland.................18,
Royal Caribbean Cruises.................... 26
Ryanair............................................................. 8
SCVX............................................................... 25
Salvatore Ferragamo............................. 14
Sberbank...................................................... 16
Serco................................................................. 2
Silver Lake.................................................. 25
Slack................................................................ 14
Smile Direct Club.................................... 16
SoftBank....................................................... 25
Sonangol......................................................... 6
South Western Railway......................... 2
Starbucks....................................................... 8
Stobart Air................................................... 19
System Capital Management........... 17
The Gores Group.................................... 25
Tiger Brokers............................................ 25
UBS.................................................................... 8
US Bancorp................................................. 16
Uber................................................................. 14
Ucommune.................................................. 25
United Capital............................................ 11

Virgin Atlantic........................................... 19
Virgin Galactic.......................................... 25
Vivint Smart Home................................ 25
WeWork.............................................14,16,
Wells Fargo......................................16,17,
Wienerberger............................................. 26
Wirecard........................................................ 17
Wynn Resorts........................................8,
Zoom............................................................... 14
Sectors
Aerospace & Defence.....................15,
Airlines................................................17,19,
Automobiles............................................... 26
Banks..................................................16,25,
Basic Resources....................................... 18
Construction.............................................. 26
Financial Services........................15,16,
Financials................................................17,
Food & Beverage..................................... 17
Healthcare.................................................... 13
Industrials.................................................... 26
Media.............................................................. 25
Mining.................................................18,19,
Oil & Gas.......................................6,15,16,
Personal & H’hold Goods............16,
Property...................................................17,
Retail............................................................... 18
Retail & Consumer.......................14,15,
Support Services..................................... 26
Technology..........................14,16,18,25,
Telecoms....................................................... 14

Transport...................................................2,
Travel & Leisure................................14,
People
Adkerson, Richard.................................. 18
Akhmetov, Rinat....................................... 17
Anderson, Mark........................................ 19
Bartlett, Manuel......................................... 8
James Benamor...................................15,
Bezos, Jeff................................................... 18
Branson, Richard..................................... 25
Bristow, Mark............................................. 18
Calhoun, David.......................................... 17
Crawford, Glen.......................................... 19
Dar, Mazy..................................................... 26
Darwall, Alexander.................................. 17
Farley, Thomas......................................... 25
Glasenberg, Ivan...................................... 18
Hermelin, Paul........................................... 18
Jañez, Claudia............................................. 8
Loeb, Dan.................................................... 25
Miller, Alexei............................................... 16
Modi, Narendra......................................... 16
Moynihan, Brian....................................... 16
Muilenburg, Dennis................................ 17
Palihapitiya, Chamath.......................... 25
Paton, Hamish......................................15,
Sanalla, Mustafa...................................... 25
Santos, Isabel dos..................................... 6
Thornton, John......................................... 18
Wilcke, Stephan........................................ 19
Woodford, Neil.......................................... 19

The SFO’s investigation was launched
in 2016 afterAirbus revealeddiscrepan-
cies in disclosures about third-party
consultantson some aircraft deals.The
French regulator launched a probe the
following year and the US Department
of Justice opened an inquiry in 2018.
The SFO is still expected to pursue
charges against individuals in relation to
Airbus subsidiary GPT, which has been
under investigation sinceit was accused
of making illicit payments to secure a
£2bn UK government contract to pro-
vide communications and intranet serv-
ices for the Saudi National Guard.
The SFO and Airbus declined to
comment.

end of a near four-year corruption
probe that has claimed omes senior
executives, even though they were not
implicated in any wrongdoing. The
board took the view that the company
would have a better chance ofa settle-
mentif a ew senior management teamn
wasin place. The process was helped by
several executivesapproaching retire-
ment age. Tom Enders, chief executive,
and Fabrice Brégier, chief operating
officer, both stepped down last spring.
The company has also overhauled its
ethics and compliance procedures, set
up an independent review panel of out-
side experts andcut he number oft
third-party agents used to secure deals.

largest fine imposed by British regula-
tors on a company for criminal conduct.
The so-called deferred prosecution
agreement struck with Airbus would
mark amilestone for theSerious Fraud
Office as it faces pressure over theretrial
of threeBarclays bankers charged in
connection with the bank’s dealings
with Qatar during the financial crisis.
Under a corporate plea deal, compa-
nies are able to avoid criminal prosecu-
tion if they admit to wrongdoing, agree
to overhaul their businesses and pay a
penalty. The SFO has signed fiveDPAs
but hasbeen criticised for failing tocon-
vict the companies’ senior executives.
For Airbus, the deal would mark the

K AT E B E I O L E Y A N D P E G GY H O L L I N G E R


Airbus s on the brink of settling ai brib-
ery and corruption probe with regula-
tors in the UK, France and the US, in a
move that could see the aerospace group
paybillions of dollars in penalties.
A dealis expected in the coming days,
according topeople familiar with the
matter, with analysts forecasting fines of
more than €3bnafter complex negotia-
tions between the three agencies.
The settlement is set to surpass the
£671mplea bargain struck by Rolls-
Royce in 2017 to settle similar allega-
tions. At the time, the UK share of the
settlement, at about £500m, was the


Airbus to settle corruption probe


3 Planemaker’s fines could reach billions 3 Deal nears with three countries’ watchdogs


Agreement
would mark

milestone
for Serious

Fraud
Office

Investors are looking back at previous
epidemics in an effort to anticipate how
badly the coronavirus outbreak could
affectalready shaky lobal markets.g
“It’s important that we don’t panic but
really look to history as a guide,” said
Kristina Hooper, chief global market
strategist at Invesco. “At the moment, so
little is known that it’s difficult to even
pull in experts.”
JPMorgan has assessed the effects of
past outbreaks, notably Sars (November
2002 to July 2003); swine flu (March
2009 to August 2010); Ebola (December
2013 to June 2016); and the Zika virus
(March 2015 to November 2016).
In each of those cases, a sharp initial
market fall quickly gave way to a recovery.
The MSCI China index fell 8.6 per cent
on the Sars outbreak, but it rebounded by
more than 30 per cent in the three months
after April 2003. Stocks in Hong Kong fell
by a fifth, butrecovered with significant
gains. Similarly, swine flu led to a 4 per
cent fall in the MSCI Mexico index, which
then gained more than 25 per cent.
“The more equities fell initially, the
more they subsequently rebounded,”
wrote Mislav Matejka, head of global and
European equity strategy at JPMorgan in
London. “These episodes did not lead to a
prolonged period of selling, and were a
buying opportunity within weeks.”
But Ms Hooper said that shorter-term
investors “should expect that if they don’t
move to safe-haven asset classes they will
be negatively impacted”.
Anna Gross, London


Sharp shockGauging the impact of disease outbreaks


In previous outbreaks,
markets swiftly rebounded

Source: JPMorgan

Calculations based on MSCI China for Sars,
MSCI Mexico for swine flu, MSCI Africa for Ebola,
MSCI Brazil for Zika

-    

Sars

Swine
flu

Ebola

Zika

From start to crisis peak
 month after peak
 months after peak


 change

Fears over the spread of coronavirus
have reached as far as the New York
Stock Exchange —Justin Lane/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

oeJ


Rennison


Tail


Risk


Range Resources rushed to refinance ts debt at the start ofi
this year, taking advantage of a rally in oil prices and
renewed investor demand for junk-rated energy bonds.
Despite the favourable backdrop, the gas-focused driller
based in exas, still had to pay up to raise fresh cash, sellingT
$550m of debt with an interest rate of 9.25 per cent. It
wanted to replace bonds that were due to expire in the next
couple of years but carried a much lower coupon, below
6 per cent.
For Range, it seems to have been smart to grab the
money when it was available. After just two weeks of trad-
ing, and with the oil pricefloundering, the new bond has
dropped to 92 cents on the dollar, pushing its yield above
10 per cent and into territory normally recognised as
“distressed”.
Range is not an isolated example. A $600m bond matur-
ing in 2025 sold byLaredo Petroleum lipped to 98 cents ons
the dollar in its first day of trading last week, and has sunk
to 93 cents on the dollar since. EQT Corporation as seenh
its new $750m bond matur-
ing in 2030 drop to 90 cents
on the dollar.
For investors who lapped
up the debt, it is a reminder
of the risks implied in those
higher returns.
Of course, if fund manag-
ers already own the bonds of
these companies, they have
an incentive to keep lending
to avoid default. But for the rest, it is probably a sign of the
excesses abounding in a world with more than $12tn of
negative-yielding debt, where the opportunity to earn
closer to 10 per cent by investing in a struggling US oil and
gas company is hard to turn down.
Global oil prices had rallied at the end of the year
because of announcements of cuts in production, followed
by a boost in early January due to tensions in the
Middle East. That set the scene for a modest rebound for
some struggling companies in the sector.
But Brent crude is now down almost 17 per cent from its
early January peak, while US natural gas prices are also
under pressure because of a mild winter.
That is prompting a lot of investors to consider deeper,
longer-term challenges for producers and refiners. Some
analysts warn that too many companies in the oil and gas
sector have unsustainable balance sheets, weighed down
by too much debt.
There is also the possibility of fossil fuels becoming
obsolete s the world shifts to more sustainable sources ofa
energy.
That means that any effort to ride a trend will probably
be vulnerable to sudden snap-backs.
“Investors are paying the price right now for being too
greedy,” said John McClain, a portfolio manager at
Diamond Hill Capital Management.

[email protected]

The chance to


earn 10 per cent
by investing in a

struggling US oil
and gas group is

hard to turn down


Flight numbersBoeing counts the cost


of the 737 Max grounding— ANALYSIS, PAGE 17


Big is bootifulWall St giants’ growing


appetite for retail banking— INSIDE FINANCE, PAGE 16


JANUARY 28 2020 Section:2Front Time: 1/202027/ - 20:25 User:adam.piggott Page Name:2FRONT, Part,Page,Edition:LON , 15, 1

Free download pdf