Table 2.6.
Babylonian intercalations in the Parthian period
(a) Early Parthian period (142/1- 88/7
BCE), from cuneiform sources1 2 34 5 67 89 10 1112 13 141516 1718 19Year 1 of cycleVIa 2XII2139/8XII2XII2(XII) 2XII2VIb 2VI2120/19XII2101/0XII2XIIc 2(b) Middle Parthian period (26/5BCE- 78/9
CE), from numismatic sources (after Assar 2003)1 2 34 5 67 89 10 1112 13 141516 1718 19(XII) 2BCE25/4
6/5XII2CE14/15
33/4(XII)VI 22(XII) 252/3(XII) 2(XII) 271/2(XII) 2aYear 142/1, in Sachs and Hunger (1988
- iii. 128
- 9 (year astronomically identi
fied) and Neugebauer (1955) ii. 442- 3 (with also the next entry).
bThe previous entry (for 126/5, in year 14), which conforms to the Saros Canon cycle, is attested in BM 45629 (= CT 49: 143). The present entry (for 125/4),which suggests anintercalation six months later, is inferred from the date VI(Ululu 1) in BM 33018 (text 21 in Hochberg 1998: 117 1- 20).
cYear 88/7BCE, the latest dated intercalation attested in cuneiform sources (in Sachs and Hunger 1988- 2006 iii).
Notes to Table 2.6 (b): Entries in brackets indicate intercalations where the month name is not specified; Assar assumes in all cases XII, but only on the basis of the Saros Canon 2cycle.Assar argues that the Seleucid Era assumed in Parthian coins begins in autumn 312BCE, as in Macedonian practice, and thus that all years begin in the autumn (more precisely inBabylonian month VII; Babylonian cuneiform sources assume a Seleucid Era beginning six months later, in the spring of 311BCE;see further Chapter 5). This table follows Assar inthis respect, but for the sake of consistency with Table 2.6(a) and previous tables in this chapter, I have converted the data in such a way that years run from spring to spring (monthI to month XII).Not included in the table is a tetradrachm from the reign of Orodes II (57-^38
BCE), dated Gorpaiosembolimos(VI) but without the year. Assuming the Saros cycle, the year could 2only have been 47BCE. In any event, this is the earliest evidence of intercalation on Parthian coins (Assar 2003: 178).