CONVERSATION
[email protected]
BBC Science Focus, Eagle House, Colston
Avenue, Bristol, BS1 4ST
@sciencefocus
http://www.facebook.com/sciencefocus
@bbcsciencefocus
CONVERSATION
YOUR OPINIONS ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND BBC SCIENCE FOCUS
“Admi edly pre y spot on
- if you told 12-year-old me
that the Freya of today has
never owned a TV, she’d
wonder where I went
wrong.”
Freya Whiteford
(@rooksoup), via Twi er
“Customised travel data
isn’t at all a bad shout, but
in the real 2020 I just get
push notifications on my
phone about Glasgow
tra ic to me, noted
pedestrian.”
In the first issue of 2010,
we made predictions
about what life in 10 years’
time would be like. You
can read the article at
bit.ly/2020_world
Freya Whiteford was 12
when she stashed away a
copy of the magazine, and
in January 2020 she took
to Twi er to reveal
how accurate we were.
eating period. Evidence suggests it’s
be er to have most of your calories
earlier in the day – he has dinner at
6pm, finishes eating by 6:30pm and
doesn’t eat again until 8:30am.
Dr Michael Mosley, BBC Science Focus
columnist
Universally speaking
In the December issue, physicist Fay
Dowker explained four-dimensional
space-time (p74). Has anyone ever
created an experiment where the
three physical directions are not
changing, only time? To do this you
would presumably have to be
compensating for the movement of
the Earth, the Solar System, the
Galaxy and, maybe, the expansion of
the Universe?
Tim Bates, via email
Cosmologically speaking, there is no
such thing as ‘staying still’. You can
only define something as moving
relative to something else, and in fact
this is fundamental to our
understanding of physics: many
physical laws rely on the idea that
there is no special point in the
Universe where you can stand and be
‘still’ with everything else moving
around you. So yes, you can create an
experiment that stays still but
changes in time, but only if you
accept that it won’t look still to
someone standing on the Moon.
Sara Rigby, BBC Science Focus online
assistant
Oops...
In the January issue (p87), we said
that 57,000 hermit crabs had been
killed. This should have been 570,000.
Old hat?
Reading ‘Why positivity is overrated’
(December, p77) I was suddenly
reminded of the poem IF by Rudyard
Kipling wri en in 1895. The second
verse goes: “If you can dream – and
not make dreams your master;
If you can think – and not make
thoughts your aim.” There you have, in
a couple of lines, what has taken Dr
Gabrielle Oe ingen 20 years of
research to discover. Perhaps the good
doctor should read more poetry?
Kipling was well aware of this 125
years ago. Makes you think, doesn’t it?
George Ford, Durham, via email
Live fast
I’ve been reading Dr Michael Mosley’s
column for some time and find it
fascinating. I also recently read his
book, The Fast Diet, which blew my
mind. I’ve been following a Time
Restricted Eating (TRE) schedule for a
few months – six days only eating in a
four-hour window, and on the seventh
day I can eat whatever, whenever. I
was amused when I read in Michael’s
January column (p62) about the TRE
study published recently, which
involved a 10-hour window – “Man
up!” I thought ;)
My question is, what is the optimal
TRE schedule? In an ideal world,
should we eat a single meal per day?
Or one 14,000 calorie meal every
seven days with nothing in between?
Ben Jones, via email
When it comes to ‘optimal’, it’s a
ma er of what you can stick to.
I asked Prof Satchin Panda, the
scientist at the Salk Institute, who has
done the pioneering science on TRE,
and he favours a 14-hour fast, 10-hour
LETTER OF THE MONTH
WRITE IN AND WIN!
The writer of next issue’s Le er Of The
Month wins a Voyager 8200
Bluetooth headset. With active
noise-cancelling, you’ll be able to
block out any distractions so you can
work, travel or snooze in peace while
listening to your favourite music and
podcasts. plantronics.com
WORTH
£370.