Fishingaffectsthewholeecosystem
and,assuch,reeffishinghashada
hugeimpactonsomeof themost
vulnerablemarineecosystems–
corals.Banningfishingcouldnot
onlyrelievepressureonsomeof the
4,000fishspeciesthatlivearound
coralreefs,butalsoonthecorals
themselves.
It’snotalwaysimmediatelyobvious
howfishingaffectsthecorals,but
Purcellgivesoneexample.Crown-of-
thornsstarfisharea scourgeonreefs
becausetheyeatthelivingpartof the
corals– thepolyps.If thestarfish
populations are not controlled by
predators,toomanypolypswillfall
preyto thesespikycreatures.Butthe
starfish’spredatorsareemperorfish,
whicharecaughtforfood,andtriton
snails,whichareprizedfortheir
shells.“I don’tthink[fishing]is the
onlyreasonwe’regettingoutbreaksof
crown-of-thornsstarfish,”says
Purcell.“Butit’soneof theproblems,
andit contributesto takingoutthe
[starfish’s]predators.”
Meanwhile,climatechangeand
increasingseatemperaturescontinue
to stressandbleachcorals,whichcan
thenbecomeovergrownwithalgae.
A fishing ban could help bolster
populationsof thefishneededto
cleanawaythissuffocatingslime.
Cleaningupcoralreefscouldalso
ensurethattheyremaintourism
destinationsforyearsto come,
supplyinglocalcommunitieswith
preciousincome,especially if fishing
wasn’t an option.
Corals would get some respite
WHAT IF... FEATURE
5
byHAYLEYBENNETT
(@g i n g e rb re a d l a d y)
Hayleyis a sciencewriterand(sustainably
sourced)fishfinger sandwich fan, based in
Bristol, UK.