166 notes to pages 26–27
de los Llanos Martínez Carrillo, “Historicidad de los ‘Miraculos Romançados’ de
Pedro Marín ( 1232 – 1293 ): el territorio y la esclavitud granadinos,” Anuario de es-
tudios medievales 21 ( 1991 ): 69 – 97.
59. ACA, R. 82 , fol. 168 v ( 21 Nov. 1290 ): “Arnaldo de Bastida quod solvat
Abenhadalillo, capiti jenetorum, mille centum viginti septem duplas quas ei [d]eb-
ent pro [qui]tacione sua et familie sue, duorum mensum, et ex alia parte, quinque
millia solidos pro quitacione quorumdam Sarracenorum Alarabum. Et facta solu-
cione et cetera. Datum Barchinone, XI kalendas Decembris.”
60. ACA, R. 252 , fol. 189 r ( 10 Mar. 1291 ) with edition also in Giménez Soler,
351 – 52 n 1. I discuss this document in further detail in chapters 4 and 5 , below.
61. Antonio Ubieto Arteta, ed., Crónica Najerense, 48 , 52 , and 63 , as cited in
Barbour, “The Significance of the Word Maurus,” 257 – 58.
62. Colin Smith, ed., Christians and Moors in Spain, 19 , as cited in Brann, “The
Moors?” 312.
63. The earliest Arabic work on the Berbers claims to date from the eighth
century. Fragments of a work attributed to Wahb b. Munabbih (d. 725 – 737 ?) ap-
pear in Ibn Qutayba (d. 889 ), Kitāb al- ma‘ārif, ed. Tharwat Ukāsha. For other
early works that describe the Berbers, see Ibn Khurradādhbih (d. ca. 911 ), Kitāb
al- masālik wa’l- mamālik, ed. Khayr al- Dīn Maḥmūd Qiblāwī; Ya‘qūbī (d. ca. 897 ),
Kitāb al- buldān, ed. Wilhelmus Theodorus Juynboll; Ibn ‘Abd al- Ḥakam (d. 871 ),
Futūḥ Miṣr wa’l- Maghrib, ed. ‘Abd al- Mun‘im ‘Āmir; and al- Mas‘ūdī (d. 956 ),
Murūj al- dhahab wa- ma‘ādin al- jawhar, ed. Charles Pellat. For an example
of ethnic tension, see Ibn Ḥazm, Jamaharat ansāb al- ‘arab, ed. ‘Abd al- Salām
Muḥammad Hārūn, 496 , as cited by López- Morillas, “Los Beréberes Zanāta,” 302.
Ibn Ḥazm rejected the claim that the Zanāta were descendants of Arabs. See also
Ramzi Rouighi, “The Andalusi Origins of the Berbers?” Journal of Medieval Ibe-
rian Studies 2 , no. 1 ( 2010 ): 93 – 108.
64. Ibn Khaldūn incorporates and develops upon other earlier works of im-
portance, such as: Ibn ‘Idhārī al- Marrākushī, al- Bayān al- mughrib f ī akhbār al-
Andalus wa’l- Maghrib, ed. G. S. Colin and Évariste Lévi- Provençal; anonymous,
al- Dhakhīra al- saniyya f ī ta’rīkh al- dawla al- Marīniyya, ed. ‘Abd al- Wahhāb b.
Mansūr; and Ibn Abī Zar‘, al- ’Anīs al- muṭrib bi- rawḍ al- qirṭās f ī akhbār mulūk al-
Maghrib wa- ta’rīkh madīnat Fās, ed. ‘Abd al- Wahhāb b. Manṣūr.
65. Muhsin Mahdi, Ibn Khaldūn’s Philosophy of History: A Study in the Philo-
sophic Foundation of the Science of Culture; Yves Lacoste, Ibn Khaldoun: Nais-
sance de l’histoire, passé du Tiers- monde; Aziz al- Azmeh, Ibn Khaldūn in Modern
Scholarship: A Study in Orientalism; idem, Ibn Khaldūn: An Essay in Reinterpreta-
tion; Maya Shatzmiller, L’Historiographie mérinide: Ibn Khaldūn et ses contempo-
rains; H. T. Norris, The Berbers in Arabic Literature, 3 – 10 ; Ahmed Abdesselem,
Ibn Khaldūn et ses lecteurs; Bruce B. Lawrence, ed., Ibn Khaldun and Islamic Ide-
ology; and Maya Shatzmiller, The Berbers and the Islamic State: The Marinid Ex-
perience in Pre- Protectorate Morocco.