Extended Data Fig. 10 | Relationship of results to original analysis. Here
we reproduce results for the variable-magnitude task in ref.^30 with two
different time windows. a, Change in firing rate in response to cued reward
delivery averaged over all cells. b, Comparing Hill-function fit and response
averaged over all cells for expected (cued) and unexpected reward delivery.
c, Correlation between response predicted by scaled common response
function and actual response to expected reward delivery. d, Zooming in
on c shows correlation driven primarily by larger reward magnitudes.
e–h, Repeating the above analysis for a window of 200–600 ms.