Nature 2020 01 30 Part.02

(Grace) #1

For a large proportion of the side chains, density was clear and practi-
cally all densities in the core of SAGA and Tra1 could be assigned with
confidence. The single exception to this procedure is the Ada3 domain
at the docking site of the HAT module, where density showed second-
ary structure elements but could not resolve individual side chains.
We cannot therefore exclude errors in amino-acids register for this
domain. Tra1 and the main lobe were separately geometry-optimized
in PHENIX^58 followed by real-space refinement with secondary struc-
ture restraints against the corresponding post-processed maps. This
procedure was repeated after a round of final manual corrections to
the structure in Coot. All display images were generated using UCSF
Chimera^59 and ChimeraX^60.


Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature
Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.


Data availability


The cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy
Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-10438 (SAGA–TBP),
EMD-10440 (SAGA–TBP, refined for Tra1 lobe), EMD-10441 (SAGA–TBP,
refined for main lobe), EMD-10446 (SAGA–TBP, low-pass-filtered), EMD-
10448 (SAGA–TBP, focused classification on TBP), EMD-10447 (SAGA
without TBP). The model coordinates for SAGA–TBP were deposited
in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession codes 6TB4 and
6TBM (including Spt8 and DUB).



  1. Ranish, J. A., Lane, W. S. & Hahn, S. Isolation of two genes that encode subunits of the
    yeast transcription factor IIA. Science 255 , 1127–1129 (1992).

  2. Mittal, C., Culbertson, S. J. & Shogren-Knaak, M. A. Distinct requirements of linker DNA
    and transcriptional activators in promoting SAGA-mediated nucleosome acetylation. J.
    Biol. Chem. 293 , 13736–13749 (2018).

  3. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction
    of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152 , 36–51 (2005).

  4. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for
    improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14 , 331–332 (2017).

  5. Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193 , 1–12 (2016).

  6. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure
    determination in RELION-3. eLife 7 , e42166 (2018).

  7. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid
    unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14 , 290–296 (2017).

  8. Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle
    image processing. eLife 7 , e35383 (2018).

  9. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM
    density maps. Nat. Methods 11 , 63–65 (2014).

  10. van Heel, M., Harauz, G., Orlova, E. V., Schmidt, R. & Schatz, M. A new generation of the
    IMAGIC image processing system. J. Struct. Biol. 116 , 17–24 (1996).
    53. Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL–EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic
    Acids Res. 47 , W636–W641 (2019).
    54. Yang, J. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function
    predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 , W174-81 (2015).
    55. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot.
    Acta Crystallogr. D 66 , 486–501 (2010).
    56. Källberg, M. et al. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web
    server. Nat. Protoc. 7 , 1511–1522 (2012).
    57. Buchan, D. W., Minneci, F., Nugent, T. C., Bryson, K. & Jones, D. T. Scalable web services for
    the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 , W349-57 (2013).
    58. Terwilliger, T. C. Rapid model building of alpha-helices in electron-density maps. Acta
    Crystallogr. D 66 , 268–275 (2010).
    59. Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera.
    J. Struct. Biol. 157 , 281–287 (2007).
    60. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and
    analysis. Protein Sci. 27 , 14–25 (2018).
    61. Zhou, Q. & Berk, A. J. The yeast TATA-binding protein (TBP) core domain assembles with
    human TBP-associated factors into a functional TFIID complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 , 534–
    539 (1995).
    62. Kelleher, R. J., III et al. Yeast and human TFIIDs are interchangeable for the response to
    acidic transcriptional activators in vitro. Genes Dev. 6 , 296–303 (1992).
    63. Ozer, J., Lezina, L. E., Ewing, J., Audi, S. & Lieberman, P. M. Association of transcription
    factor IIA with TATA binding protein is required for transcriptional activation of a subset of
    promoters and cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 ,
    2559–2570 (1998).
    64. Laprade, L., Rose, D. & Winston, F. Characterization of new Spt3 and TATA-binding protein
    mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Spt3 TBP allele-specific interactions and bypass of
    Spt8. Genetics 177 , 2007–2017 (2007).


Acknowledgements We thank D. Devys and L. Tora for carefully reading the manuscript and
for advice; R. Wagner and B. Séraphin for advice during the initial stages of this project; and R.
Ben-Shem for graphics expertise. We acknowledge support from the Institut National de la
Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), the Centre National pour la Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS), the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), the Ligue contre
le Cancer, ANR-15-CE11-0022-01 and ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, a French State fund managed
by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the frame program Investissements d’Avenir
ANR-10- IDEX-0002-02. We acknowledge the use of resources of the French Infrastructure for
Integrated Structural Biology FRISBI ANR-10-INBS-05 and of Instruct-ERIC.

Author contributions P.S. and A.B.-S. designed the study; A.B.-S. designed the SAGA
purification method and reconstituted the SAGA–TBP complex; A.B.-S. and C.C. defined
conditions for grid preparation and freezing; C.C. and G.P. froze grids; G.P. collected and
analysed cryo-EM data; A.F., G.P. and A.B.-S. interpreted the maps by fitting crystal coordinates
and model building; O.K. purified TBP, TFIIA and SAGA and used them to perform pull-down
and gel-shift assays; P.S. and A.B.-S. supervised the work; G.P. and O.K. prepared figures; and
A.B.-S. and P.S. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-
1944-2.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.S. or A.B.-S.
Peer review information Nature thanks Steve Hahn and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for
their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Reprints and permissions information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints.
Free download pdf