The Eurasian Triangle. Russia, the Caucasus and Japan, 1904-1945

(WallPaper) #1

154 Ë The Caucasus Group and Japan


ligence to each other, Germany and Japan were also to exchange their views of the in-


telligence shared. This secret agreement was ocially approved by the Japanese army


and the German Wehrmacht (armed forces) on 7 October 1937, with additional clauses


on conducting joint anti-Soviet counterintelligence and holding an annual meeting to


exchange and evaluate the intelligence shared between the two countries.¹⁰¹


The most interesting part of the agreement is the “Additional Protocol concerning


‘Anti-Soviet’ Plotting and Subversion (boryaku ̄ ,Zersetzungsarbeit).” In it, Germany


and Japan agreed to collaborate in encouraging all national minority movements


within the Soviet Union, promoting anti-Bolshevik propaganda, and instigating rev-


olutionary activities, terrorist acts and sabotage activities at the outbreak of war.


Further, the additional protocol specied that the main spheres of action be divided


between the two countries: (1) the western borderlands (from Finland to Bulgaria)


would belong mainly to Germany, (2) the southwestern borderlands (Turkey and Iran)


to both, and (3) the eastern Asiatic front primarily to Japan. Clause Seven of the pro-


tocol, for example, stated that in case one party was drawn into war with the Soviet


Union, the other would be obliged to escalate diversionary tactics by “all means pos-


sible” in the areas of primary interest (the western borderlands for Germany and the


eastern, Asiatic front for Japan) as well as the area of mutual interest (the southwestern


borderlands). The action plan of the protocol covered ve years, from 1937–1941.¹⁰²


TheOshima-Canaris agreement also included as an appendix an intriguing ve- ̄


year plan of joint action in the Caucasus area. For 1937, for instance, it included the


following to be accomplished in Turkey: contacting and bribing important political


gures, establishing contacts with “military sites” (the general sta), and building


secret stations at several points near the Soviet borders (under the guise of commer-


cial ventures).¹⁰³The 1937 plan for Europe included training cadres recruited from the


Soviet Caucasus and dispatching them back into Soviet territory. The 1938 plan for


Turkey envisaged strengthening and increasing border stations, founding communi-


cation links through Black Sea boats, setting up courier routes, training and placing


border crossers, and establishing cells in the Caucasus area and links with them.¹⁰⁴


Similar plans for Iran were drawn up for 1938. The 1939 plan for Turkey included es-


tablishing radio communication, studying airport construction, and training a core


group for the creation of a Caucasian Army; the plan for Iran included establishing


101 Tajima,Nachizumu kyokuto senryaku ̄ , 208–09. Julius Mader,Hitlers Spionagegenerale sagen aus:
Ein Dokumentarbericht über Aufbau, Struktur und Operationen des OKW-Geheimdienstamtes Aus-
land/Abwehr mit einer Chronologie seiner Einsätze von 1933 bis 1944(Berlin: Verlag der Nation, 1971),
197–98 and 314–15 discusses this agreement, which dates it to June 1938, which seems to be a mistake,
although possibly an additional agreement was signed at that time.
102 See Hiroaki Kuromiya and Georges Mamoulia, “Anti-Russian and Anti-Soviet Subversion: The
Caucasian-Japanese Nexus.”Europe-Asia Studies61, no. 6 (2009), 1,427.
103 Kuromiya and Mamoulia, “Anti-Russian and Anti-Soviet Subversion,” 1,427–1,428.
104 Kuromiya and Mamoulia, “Anti-Russian and Anti-Soviet Subversion,” 1,428.

Free download pdf