Banner 3-21-2024

(J-Ad) #1
The Hastings Banner — Thursday, March 21, 2024 — Page 5

Yankee Springs Township


Hall addition damaged when


struck by runaway car


Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
A little more than a year after construc-
tion was completed on a 1,700-square-foot
addition to the Yankee Springs Township
Hall, some cracks have been discovered in
the addition’s north wall as well as the dry-
wall inside the building.
But township officials say it’s not
because of poor workmanship or shoddy
materials.
They recently discovered the building
was struck by a car that had been left run-
ning and was not in park after the driver got
out of the vehicle to use the recycling bins
at the north end of the hall property.
“We had the construction company and
the engineering company come out, and
they looked at it, and it looked like it was
impact (damage),” Township Clerk Mike
Cunningham said at last Thursday’s Town-
ship Board meeting. “We had no knowl-
edge of anything hitting the wall.”
The cracks were discovered in late Feb-
ruary, Cunningham said.
Cunningham found security video foot-
age that provided the answers to the mys-
tery. Video footage taken on Jan. 1 showed
a car stopping about 50 feet from the north
wall of the addition after using the recy-
cling system, and the woman who was
driving got out of the vehicle “with the
intent to put something in the garbage can.”
However, the car was apparently left run-
ning and was not in park, Cunningham said.
“The car moved away under power
towards the building with the driver in pur-
suit. The driver fell, the car went over the
curb, down the slope and hit the building
with enough force to cause drywall crack-

ing inside and brick and mortar cracking in
about a 15-foot-wide section of the exterior
wall,” Cunningham said.
The driver involved in the incident came
forward about an hour before Thursday
night’s meeting and spoke to Cunningham
about what happened. The woman suffered
a broken leg when she fell trying to get
back in the car and the wheels ran over her
leg, Cunningham said.
“We know who did it. There’s no damage
to that car. That person didn’t know there
was damage (to the building),” he said.
The driver got back in the vehicle and was
able to drive back up the slope and go home
before she was taken to the hospital for
treatment of her injuries, Cunningham said.
The accident has been reported to the
Barry County Sheriff’s Office and a claim
was filed with the township’s insurance
carrier, with a claim estimated in the $5,
to $10,000 range.
Mugen Construction, the contractor that
did the work on the addition and renovation
of the township hall, says it has enough
brick left over from the project to repair the
brick damage, with the repair expected to
take two days to complete. The wall fram-
ing will be inspected when the wall is
opened up for drywall repair, possibly next
week, Cunningham said.
“We don’t know if there’s any significant
framing damage, but I’m guessing not,”
Cunningham said.
The township moved into the expanded
office space in January 2023, allowing
Mugen Construction to then begin work on
renovating the original township space,
including the meeting room where the
board meets.

Transparency is indeed


important – not just for


a select few


To the Editor:
I appreciated Fred’s column, “Withheld
news is a danger to freedom,” in the March
14 Banner. While he chose to focus his ire on
those in Lansing, he could easily have point-
ed the spotlight on the Barry County Sheriff.
Mr. Leaf continues to dangle his “very
serious investigation” in front of the public,
even tempting us with the promise of pre-
senting information on his “findings,” which
he has since walked back. Yet, Fred states in
his column that “(i)f we expect our elected
officials to be accountable, then transparency
is a must because it is fundamental to abol-
ishing corruption.”
“Our leaders have the responsibility to
keep their constituents informed,” he states.
When one promises to disseminate infor-
mation, shouldn’t one be held accountable to
their word? Again, Fred opines, rightly so,
that “(g)overnment transparency shouldn’t be
treated as a burden or avoided.”
I should not single out Mr. Leaf and his
office for lack of transparency and reticence
to disclose how our county tax dollars are
being spent. My understanding is that the
County Administrator’s Office, when
FOIA’ed for information about the costs
involved with Mr. Leaf’s witch-hunt – oops,
“investigation” – threw up their hands, claim-
ing that the information was either not easily
obtained or just wasn’t collected.
Per their response to that FOIA request,
“In general, county staff time and vehicle
mileage is not tracked and recorded relating
to specific issues, or civil/criminal investiga-
tion...I understand your frustration, but in
the public sector, employees are public ser-
vants, responsible for whatever tasks arise.
As such, we do not track the time employees
spend on each issue that arises as there is no
mechanism to ‘bill back’ time to specific
‘customers.’”
The County Administrator’s Office went
on to bemoan that they “would have to look
into whether time sheets are available” and
expressed concern that paycheck information
might include items protected by HIPAA or
other regulations.
Come on, folks – this is what FOIA and
redacting are about. I worked in the public
sector for nearly 20 years and had to keep
track of what hours were attributed to what
projects. With all the claims for how import-
ant this witch-hunt (oops, I did it again) was,
a smart manager, administrator or elected
official would have said, “Record your time,
travel and meals.” No? Hmm, I guess we’ll
just count that as a lesson learned. And, by
the way, a back-of-the-envelope estimate for


the minimum amount spent on this investiga-
tion came to $200,000.
As Fred stated, “Newspapers have been
variously described as watchdogs that hold
our civic institutions accountable. They fur-
nish the checks upon government that no
constitution has ever been able to provide.”
I hope I have helped out our local paper by
“shedding some light on the conduct of pub-
lic officials and the business of governing.”
Thanks for the opportunity to use your
words, Fred!

Chris Bush
Nashville

Raccoons – How many


are too many?


Editor:
Raccoons are omnivores. They eat almost
anything, including ducks, eggs, turtles, mice,
voles, rabbits, squirrels, fish, snakes and frogs.
If you are like me, you may have noticed a
reduction in the number of birds you see. On
my 78-acre farm with 54 acres of grass, I
have noticed a reduction in both the number
of birds and the species of birds. In the past
25 years, gone are the ruffed grouse, ring-
necked pheasant, bobolink, meadowlark, ves-
per sparrow and grasshopper sparrow. Mal-
lard and wood ducks along with the wood
thrush, field and song sparrows are having
trouble reproducing.
Why is this?
A large part of the answer, I believe, is
raccoons. A few years ago, I started noticing
lots and lots of raccoons in the pictures from
my trail camera. In 2022, I attempted to trap
raccoons to see how many inhabited the farm.
That year in two months of trapping I caught


  1. Wow! That was a lot more than I expect-
    ed. The next year, I made a concentrated
    effort and caught 55 raccoons. That’s a total
    of 83 raccoons. My neighbor with a vegetable
    garden captured 14 raccoons. Another land-
    owner in Barry County harvested over 100
    raccoons on his property.
    Raccoon populations continue to rise and
    the damage they cause to the ecosystem is
    also on the rise.
    A long time ago, when I was a kid (we are
    talking the 50s here), there were not nearly as
    many raccoons as there are today. Friends
    who ran trap lines rarely caught these crea-
    tures of the night. Traplines yielded muskrats
    and mink but not many raccoons. Why was
    this? First, the pelts were worth something
    and there were more folks running trap lines.
    Today, the pelts might be worth 6 bucks, and
    most trappers out there do it as a hobby rather
    than the funds produced.
    Farms were smaller then and most had a
    henhouse. Raccoons were not allowed, and a
    shotgun was kept nearby to dispatch these
    and other egg robbers.
    Life was tough for a raccoon; sportsmen
    had a great time running coon dogs, often
    treeing a masked bandit after hours of late-
    night sport.
    The bottom line is that the raccoon popula-


tion was kept in check. But things have
changed, and the raccoon population is out of
control. For instance, take a drive out on a
typical rural road and count the number of
raccoons hit by vehicles. The count will sur-
prise you.
Coyotes, foxes and great horned owls prey
upon young raccoons but they are not keep-
ing the population in check. The number of
raccoons has increased exponentially as the
landscape has been fractured by an increasing
population moving into the country. Their
population has increased with improved
access to garbage and additional food sourc-
es. An interesting note is that the state of
South Dakota has a limited bounty on rac-
coons during the nesting season of 10 dollars
per raccoon.
There are too many raccoons in Barry
County and both game birds and songbirds
are disappearing because of it.
What can the landowner do to reduce the
population of raccoons and help the birds?
One option is to use a dog-proof trap. Baited
with peanut butter, this tube-type trap catches
the raccoon by the leg. Be careful dispatching
the raccoons, as they can bite. You can also
use a live trap but do not allow the raccoon to
escape alive. The preferred method is to teach
it to swim.

Jim Bruce
Hastings Charter Township

SUBMIT A LETTER TO


THE BANNER


As the name implies, letters should be
directed to the editor, not to any specific or
broad audience.
The Hastings Banner welcomes letters to
the editor from readers, but a few conditions
must be met before they will be published.
The requirements are:


  • All letters must be signed by the writer,
    with address and phone number provided for
    verification. All that will be printed is the
    writer’s name and community of residence.
    We do not publish anonymous letters, and
    names will be withheld at the editor’s discre-
    tion for compelling reasons only.

  • Letters that contain statements that are
    libelous or slanderous will not be published.

  • All letters are subject to editing for style,
    grammar and sense.

  • Letters that serve as testimonials for, or
    criticisms of, businesses will not be accepted.

  • Letters serving the function of “cards of
    thanks” will not be accepted unless it is of
    public interest, which will be determined by
    the editor.

  • Letters that include attacks of a personal
    nature will not be published or will be edited
    heavily.

  • “Crossfire” letters between the same two
    people on one issue will be limited to one for
    each writer.

  • In an effort to keep opinions varied, there
    is a limit of one letter per person per month.

  • We prefer letters to be printed legibly or
    typed


Putnam District Library receives $10,


national grant for small and rural libraries


Putnam District Library has been selected
as one of 310 libraries to participate in round
two of Libraries Transforming Communities:
Accessible Small and Rural Communities, an
American Library Association (ALA) initia-
tive that provides community engagement
and accessibility resources to small and rural
libraries to help them better serve people with
disabilities.
The competitive award comes with a
$10,000 grant that will help the library provide
library services to residents who lack transpor-
tation to the library and purchase resources to
better serve people with disabilities.
“We are ecstatic to have this opportunity to
better serve people in our community through
new outreach and home delivery services,”
said Library Director Krista Vincent. “This
grant will cover the cost of mileage and staff
time to provide home delivery for people
with disabilities and mobility issues, and
additional funds to purchase resources and


learning tools for children with disabilities
and other challenges.”
Putnam District Library serves the village
of Nashville and the townships of Maple
Grove, Castleton and Assyria.
“One of the greatest challenges in our ser-
vice area is lack of transportation and access
to library services,” said Vincent. “Since
starting as director one year ago, I’ve met
multiple individuals with a disability or other
impairment that makes it difficult to get out,
especially during the winter months. “And,
due to the lack of local childcare options and
the distance many families travel to work,
homebound individuals are also caretakers of
children. This provides a unique set of chal-
lenges. We are hoping to not only deliver
reading materials but also learning toys and
resources for children with a disability or the
characteristics of a disability such as ADHD,
autism and dyslexia.”
As part of the grant, the library will be host-

ing community conversations with residents to
ensure that the grant funds are put to the best
possible use. These conversations will be
scheduled in April and May and will involve
multiple ways for people to provide input.
Interested individuals may contact the library
director at 517-852-9723 for more information.
Since 2014, ALA’s Libraries Transforming
Communities initiative has re-imagined the role
libraries play in supporting communities.
Libraries of all types have utilized free dialogue
and deliberation training and resources to lead
community and campus forums; take part in
anti-violence activities; provide a space for res-
idents to come together and discuss challenging
topics; and have productive conversations with
civic leaders, library trustees and staff.
Libraries Transforming Communities:
Accessible Small and Rural Communities is
an initiative of the American Library Associ-
ation (ALA) in collaboration with the Associ-
ation for Rural and Small Libraries (ARSL).

Sunfield Township hears input from


community on TimberCreek tax dispute


Molly Macleod
Copy Editor
In the wake of last month’s ruling by
Michigan Tax Tribunal Judge Patricia L.
Halm in favor of TimberCreek Ranch, Sun-
field Township representatives have been
doing some soul-searching. The township
board invited residents on Monday to give
their input on whether they think the town-
ship should appeal the decision.
Halm’s ruling upheld TimberCreek’s assertion
that as a nonprofit the ranch is tax-exempt. Halm
set the taxable values for the seven parcels of
ranch property at $0 for the years 2022 and 2023.
That will also be the value moving forward.
Halm set the taxable value for the ranch’s prop-
erty at around $50,000 across the seven parcels
for Tax Year 2021, when the ranch transitioned
from Sunnycrest Youth Ranch to TimberCreek
Ranch. This was also the year the ranch lost its
child caring institution license. When shifting
from Sunnycrest to TimberCreek, the ranch
stopped serving boys under 18 and began target-
ing young men over 18 and in their 20s.
Because TimberCreek already paid its
taxes for Tax Years 2021 and 2022, last


month’s ruling means that the taxes already
paid by the ranch must now be returned.
Much of these tax dollars have already been
disseminated to local entities including the
schools and fire department.
In all, nearly $76,000 will be paid back to
TimberCreek, barring an appeal.
Compared to other entities repaying Tim-
berCreek’s tax dollars, the township’s budget
will remain relatively unscathed. For the two
years in question, the township will pay back
just over $4,000. Lakewood Public Schools
alone will pay over $45,000.
“I think you oughta appeal this,” Sunfield
resident John Fisher told board members on
Monday. “I’ve been down this road personal-
ly on tax tribunal issues and appeals. I had an
appeal that was in the courts for six years
before it was finally upheld. I think with all
the tentacles that this particular issue rep-
resents... I think we cannot not do anything.”
Trustee Jeff Smith said his main reservation
with going down the path of an appeal is
whether it’s worth the time and money involved.
“What can we accomplish? OK, we didn’t
win. We did what we thought was right, but

here are some positive things that we can work
on. How long do you keep spending time and
energy on something when you can do some-
thing different?” said Smith. “We talked about
supporting the fire department a little better...
all these things. I’m with you, but at a certain
point, when do we use your money better?”
While several audience members gave
their support for an appeal, Sunfield Town-
ship Supervisor Selena Duits expressed her
reservations about making a decision without
more input from residents. Duits said that she
and the board are waiting to hear back from
the township’s lawyer, Donovan Visser, about
the township’s chances for a successful
appeal and how much time and money that
could involve. Once more information is
known, the board will hold a town hall-style
meeting to hear direction from the communi-
ty before deciding to appeal or not.
“Our issue is it’s a huge financial decision.
Before (when deciding to take on the case), it
was a packed house, we had all kinds of sup-
port. And right now, we have four or five. I
don’t think we have enough input to make
that decision,” said Duits.

ORANGEVILLE TOWNSHIP^213731
2024 BUDGET
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE

The Orangeville Township Board will hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed Budget
for fiscal year 2024 at the Orangeville Township Hall 7350 Lindsey Rd. Plainwell Mi.
49080: Tuesday March 27, at 7:00 P.M.

The Property tax Millage rate proposed to be levied to support the proposed
budget will be the subject of this hearing.

Copy of the proposed budget will be available for public inspection at the Township
office. The Orangeville Township Board will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids
and services as required by the Disabilities Act.

Americans with Disabilities Act; stating that if those with disabilities notify the clerk
within 10 days prior to the meeting, accommodations will be furnished to satisfy such
disabilities and allow meaningful attendance. Individuals with disabilities requiring
auxiliary aids or services should contact the Clerk: Mel Risner ; Home -672-2324 office-
269-664-4522.

Thomas Rook
Supervisor Orangeville Township
616-299-

BALTIMORE TOWNSHIP


BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE


The Baltimore Township Board will hold a public hearing on
the proposed township budget for fiscal year 2024-25 at the
Baltimore Township Hall located at 3100 E. Dowling Rd.,
Hastings, MI on Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 9:00am.

A copy of the budget is available for public inspection by call-
ing the Township Supervisor, Chad VanSyckle, at 269-838-
0536.

This notice is posted in compliance with Public Act 267 of
1976 amended MCL 41.72a (2) (3) and the Americans with
Disabilities Act.

The Baltimore Township board will provide necessary reason-
able auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hear-
ing impaired and audiotapes of printed materials being consid-
ered at the meeting, to individuals with disabilities at the meet-
ing upon ten (10) days’ notice to the Baltimore Township
Board. NOTE: Individuals with disabilities requiring auxiliary
aids or service should contact the Baltimore Township Clerk
by calling Jana Bishop at 269-378-7280.

213482

Putnam District Library in Nashville received a $10,000 grant used to serve resi-
dents who lack transportation or are dealing with disabilities. (Courtesy photo)
Free download pdf