Notes to Pages 105–109 223http:// www. lib - hkd. jp / hensan / hakodateshishi / tsuusetsu 03 / shishi 05–02 / shishi _ 05
–02–05–06–04. htm (accessed January 29, 2015). Thanks to Dr. Hiroaki Kuromiya for the
translations.
- Arsenev, “Doklad,” 101.
- RGASPI-f. 17, o. 21, d. 5411, l. 270.
- RGASPI-f. 17, o. 21, d. 5411, l. 274.
- GAKhK-f. P-2, o. 1, d. 111, l. 2. Comrade Mamaev’s report also mentioned the
or ga ni za tion INKORPORE. - Kan, Lev Shternberg, 314–315.
- See Sergei Kan, correspondence/e- mail to author, June 23, 2011.
- There is also the “constructivist” view on nationality. Yelena Peschereva, a field
ethnographer for KIPS in Central Asia, stated that she “ ‘had given birth to thousands of
Tajiks’ by simply registering them as such, so as to suit the purposes of the Committee on
national- territorial delimitation. Even more Tajiks were registered as Uzbeks.” See Tishkov,
Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and after the Soviet Union, 20. - Some Rus sian historians disagree. Instead, they believe that Soviet anthropology
contained no teachings that could be construed as “race” (inheritable traits) or essentialism;
see Hirsch, Empire of Nations, 108. - Bruce Grant interviewed Zakharii Cherniakov one of the last surviving stu-
dents of Shternberg in 1997. He asked Cherniakov, “Did Shternberg ever talk about [Franz]
Boas?” Cherniakov replied, “Shternberg did, and Bogoraz especially. They both considered
themselves to be students of Boas.” Boas was one of the most preeminent primordialists
among anthropologists. See Shternberg, The Social Or ga ni za tion of the Gilyak, 248. Regard-
ing Soviet eugenics, see David L. Hoffman and Annette F. Timm, “Utopian Biopolitics:
Reproductive Policies, Gender Roles, and Sexuality in Nazi Germany and the Soviet
Union” in Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared, ed. Sheila Fitzpatrick
and Michael Geyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 102–103. - Mogilner, Homo imperii, 495.
- Map 2 did not list an author. Arsenev was commissioned to produce the exact
report and title. For the actual commissioning of the report, see Khistamutdinov, Vladimir
Klavdievich Arsenev, 172–174. - This article mentions Easterners but names only Chinese and Koreans.
- “Rabota sredi natsionalnikh menshinstv okrug: Doklad tov. Tishkin,” Krasnoe
znamia, February 1, 1929, no. 25 (2540). - Svetlana V. Onegina, “The Resettlement of Soviet Citizens from Manchuria in
1935–36: A Research Note,” Europe- Asia Studies 47, no. 6 (September 1995): 1043. The
percentage of ex- Whites among the Rus sian population in Manchuria is not given. - “Difficult too is the task of judging what the implications were of the Soviet
Union employing Koreans in their military activities.” See Patrikeef, Rus sian Politics in Exile,
106, on the brief war; chapter 6 of Patrikeef ’s book covers the brief 1929 Sino- Soviet War
in detail. - B. D. Pak, Kim Pen Khva i Kolkhoz <
> (Moscow: IV RAN,
2006), 18–19. The Rus sian historian Dmitrii Shin indicated that besides Kim Pen Hva
there were other Koreans in the 76th regiment as well; see Dmitrii Shin, e- mail to author,
March 22, 2014. - Macintosh, Juggernaut, 64–65. A military history book, this provides a detailed
description of the “mop-up” operations against the Chinese warlords and their operations
and the areas of battle are not provided in Kim Pen Khva.