Financial Times 19Feb2020

(Dana P.) #1

20 ★ Wednesday19 February 2020


Guy Stear


Markets Insight


Emerson Electricfaded after RBC Capital


Markets downgraded to “sector perform”


on fading hopes of a break-up.


At an analyst meeting last week,


Emerson management indicated that cost


cuts were the priority and thatportfolio


reshaping would only happen if paired


with a big strategic acquisition, RBC said.


A profit warning sunkConagra Brands


with the owner of Chef Boyardee and


Reddi-wip foods cutting 2020 organic


sales and margin guidance to reflect soft


retail sales through January.


The unscheduled update, which


followed upbeat guidance in mid-


December, raised further doubts about


whether Conagra’s 2023 targets were


realistic.


Krogerrose on the back of news late


last week thatBerkshire Hathawaywas


holding a stake in the grocer with a value


of about $549m.


Asset managersFranklin Resources


andLegg Masongained after the former


agreed to buy the latter for $4.5bn.


Appleand its suppliers weakened on


its warning that the coronavirus was


slowing iPhone production and deferring


sales in China.


Qualcomm,Texas Instruments,


Microchip Technology,Lam Research


andQorvoall were hit.Bryce Elder


Wall Street Eurozone London


UBI Bancaled the European lenders


sharply higher afterIntesa Sanpaolo


launched an unsolicited all-share offer,


which raised sector consolidation hopes.


Intesa’s offer “is the first of its type and


size for many years”, said Commerzbank,


which argued that Germany and Italy had


the most to gain fromconsolidation in a


sector where hostile bids have been rare.


“That Intesa chose to surprise UBI and


the market this way indicates a lack of


interest from any such discussions and a


sense that doing nothing from a strategic


perspective was no longer acceptable,”


Commerzbanksaid.


Kerry Groupof Ireland rose after full-


year results met consensus forecasts.


The food supplement maker guided for


constant currency earnings per share


growth of between 5 and 9 per cent for


2020, which matched forecasts at the top


end in spite of coronavirus disruption in


the first quarter.


Worldline, the French payments group,


gained on an upgrade to “buy” from UBS.


The broker valued Worldline’s terminals


business at between €2.2bn and €3.4bn


with a valuation at the upper end likely in


the event of a trade sale.


Vopak, the Dutch fuel storage


company, drifted lower after Credit Suisse


advised taking profit.Bryce Elder


Weir Groupwas under pressure as


analysts urged caution ahead of the


pumpmaker’s full-year results due next


week.


Weak demand for mining equipment, a


further deterioration in the outlook for oil


and gas demand and currency headwinds


suggest 2020 consensus forecasts need


to move lower, said JPMorgan Cazenove.


Vodafonegained after the Betaville


website picked up on rumours that a


“mystery company” was weighing up


making a takeover offer.


People familiar with Vodafone said they


knew nothing of potential bid interest.


HSBCled the FTSE 100 fallers after the


bank suspended share buybacks for the


next two years to pay for a restructuring.


The lender also lowered guidance for






Coca-Cola HBCretreated after


Citigroup advised taking profit.


InterContinental Hotelsreversed an


opening loss to end higher after


management used a post-results


conference call to play down the likely


impact to revenue from the coronavirus.


IQE, the semiconductor wafer maker,


was the worst performer among UK


technology stocks in reaction toApple’s


warning of production bottlenecks and


weak iPhone sales in China.Bryce Elder


3 Apple’s warning over the coronavirus


sends tech stocks sharply lower


3 Drop in investor sentiment weighs on


German equities


3 Gold breaches $1,600 for only the


second time since 2013


Global stocks retreated yesterday after


Appleissued a sales warning that


brought home to investors the economic


damage being wrought by the


coronavirus outbreak.


The tech giant said “worldwide iPhone


supply will be temporarily constrained”


due to the epidemic and factories run by


its suppliers in China were resuming work


more slowly than expected.


“The warning from a member of the


$1tndollar tech club is as big a red flag as


any for a market priced for perfection,”


said Eleanor Creagh, Australian market


strategist at Saxo Bank.


“China’s importance within intertwined


global supply chains and


interdependencies between component


makers mean one missing part or stalled


factory can create bottlenecks down a


whole production line,” she added.


Shares in Apple sank more than 2 per


cent yesterday alongside a broader slide


in tech stocks.


Hong Kong-listedAAC Technologies, a


maker of acoustic parts for Apple, fell 3.


per cent while iPhone assemblerHon Hai


Precision, better known as Foxconn,


retreated 0.6 per cent.


The Philadelphia Semiconductor index,


which includes companies with strong


trading ties to China, tumbled 1.7 per


cent, underperforming the wider S&P


500, which was down 0.6 per cent by


midday.


The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell


0.4 per cent while the Dow Jones


Industrial Average slid 0.9 per cent.


Chipmakers also lagged behind the


broader market across the Atlantic where


the tech sector fell 0.7 per cent against a


0.4 per cent slide for the region-wide


Stoxx Europe 600.


Frankfurt’s Xetra Dax fell 0.8 per cent


after a closely watched survey revealed


that investor sentiment in Germany had


dropped sharply in February owing to


exporters’ concerns about the


coronavirus.


Oil was caught up in the retreat with


Brent crude, the global benchmark, falling


0.8 per cent to $57.24 a barrel.


The risk-off tone to the session led to


rallies in haven assets such as gold, which


rose 1.4 per cent to breach $1,600 an


ounce for only the second time since


March 2013.Ray Douglas


What you need to know


Apple’s sales warning hits chipmakers


Source: Bloomberg


Indices rebased























Wed Thu Fri Tue


S&P 
Philadelphia Semiconductor

The day in the markets


Markets update


US Eurozone Japan UK China Brazil


Stocks S&P 500 Eurofirst 300 Nikkei 225 FTSE100 Shanghai Comp Bovespa


Level 3355.82 1677.46 23193.80 7382.01 2984.97 113760.


% change on day -0.72 -0.37 -1.40 -0.69 0.05 -1.


Currency $ index (DXY) $ per € Yen per $ $ per £ Rmb per $ Real per $


Level 99.292 1.082 109.810 1.304 7.005 4.


% change on day 0.292 -0.092 -0.132 0.231 0.348 0.


Govt. bonds 10-year Treasury 10-year Bund 10-year JGB 10-year Gilt 10-year bond 10-year bond


Yield 1.545 -0.409 -0.055 0.631 2.901 6.


Basis point change on day -4.170 -0.700 -1.220 -3.200 0.600 5.


World index, CommodsFTSE All-World Oil - Brent Oil - WTI Gold Silver Metals (LMEX)


Level 380.03 57.21 51.90 1580.80 17.80 2691.


% change on day -0.68 -0.57 -0.73 -0.04 0.54 0.


Yesterday's close apart from: Currencies = 16:00 GMT; S&P, Bovespa, All World, Oil = 17:00 GMT; Gold, Silver = London pm fix. Bond data supplied by Tullett Prebon.


Main equity markets


S&P 500 index Eurofirst 300 index FTSE 100 index


||||||| ||||||||| ||||


Dec 2020 Feb


3120


3200


3280


3360


3440


||||||||||||||||||||


Dec 2020 Feb


1600


1640


1680


1720


|||||| |||||||| ||||||


Dec 2020 Feb


7200


7360


7520


7680


Biggest movers


% US Eurozone UK


Ups


Leidos Holdings 9.


Advance Auto Parts 5.


Franklin Resources 5.


Kroger Co (the) 4.


Newmont 3.


Kerry Grp 3.


Carrefour 3.


Coloplast 2.


Edf 2.


Intesa Sanpaolo 2.


Nmc Health 5.


Vodafone 2.


United Utilities 2.


Intercontinental Hotels 2.


Hikma Pharmaceuticals 1.


%


Downs


Conagra Brands -7.


Centurylink -5.


Mohawk Industries -4.


Vulcan Materials (holding ) -4.


Whirlpool -4.


Prices taken at 17:00 GMT


Renault -6.


Thyssenkrupp -5.


Aegon -3.


Alstom -3.


Vopak -3.


Based on the constituents of the FTSE Eurofirst 300 Eurozone


Hsbc Holdings -6.


Glencore -4.


Auto Trader -4.


Antofagasta -3.


Smurfit Kappa -3.


All data provided by Morningstar unless otherwise noted.


C


orporate bonds can be


boring. The period between


2004 and 2006 wasparticu-


larly dull. Euro-denomi-


nated investment grade


credit spreads — the extra yield over


benchmark government bonds — stuck


inarangeofjust0.32percentagepoints.


The credit spread of the index began


and ended the period at the same level.


In 2020, many credit investors seem to


thinkthistediouspatternhasreturned.


Corporate bond spreads are already


close to the floor of their trading range


over the past 10 years and there is noth-


ing on the immediate horizon to make


themwiden.


US and European growth is plodding


along and vigilant central banks are in


the wings, ready to quash volatility as


soonasitappears.


Yet such complacency is misplaced.


Credit spreads are unlikely to move


sideways for long because credit spread


cycles have become much more volatile


sincetheglobalfinancialcrisis.


In the 30 years before the 2008 crisis,


a typical credit spread cycle lasted eight


years. After widening for 18 months,


spreads tended to tighten for two years


and then move sideways in a period of


low volatility that could last for up to


fiveyears.


But in the past decade,the cycle has


shortened. The bear markets of 2007,


2011, 2015 and 2018 were swiftly fol-


lowed by bull markets while periods of


sidewaystradinghavebecomeshorter.


To understand why credit cycles have


shrunk, investors need to go backto the


dollar-denominated credit markets of


the 1970s. Like Europe, the USexperi-


enced long, drawn-out cycles in the


1980sand1990s.


But in the 1970s,US credit cycles were


short and sharp — much like the cycles


of the past 10 years. Why have credit


cycles returned to the patterns of the


1970s? Beards may be back along with


flared trousers but the more important


parallelfor investors lies in the level of


governmentbondyields.


Nominal yields were high in that


period and have been low or even nega-


tive in the past decade; yet in both peri-


ods real yields were very low. Between


1973 and the end of 1979, real US bond


yields — as measured by nominal 10-


year yields, minus the spot annual infla-


tionrate—averagedminus0.3percent.


From 1980 to 2010, real yields roseto


an average of 3.5 per cent; in the past 10


yearsithasfallenbackto0.6percent.


Real bond yields fell in both periods


because of central banks. In the past


decade, central banks depressed nomi-


nal yields below inflation rates by cut-


ting short-term interest rates and buy-


ing bonds through quantitative easing.


In the 1970s, governments did the same


thingbycappingnominalbondyields.


But why should low or negative real


bond yields make credit spreads more


volatile?


Low real yields increase the propen-


sity of companies to borrow. When


nominalyieldsareatorclosetothelevel


of inflation, companies have to generate


only small real returns to cover borrow-


ingcosts.Borrowingsurgesasaresult.


Although more leveraged balance


sheets can be financed when yields are


low, they do leave companies more vul-


nerable when the economy turns down.


At the same time, low real yields also


influence investor behaviour. Many of


the buyers of bonds on both sides of the


Atlantic are purchasing fixed income


assetstofinancetheirliabilities.


Insurance companies buy bonds to


finance life insurance contracts while


pension funds invest to provide retire-


ment benefits. Both need positive real


yields to generate the payments they


havepromisedtheirinvestors.


Therefore,asrealyieldsinthegovern-


ment bond market fall, these investors


moveintoriskierassets—suchascorpo-


ratebonds—tomeettheirneeds.


Increased demand for borrowing


from companies and increased demand


for assets from investors may seem well


matched. But when supply and demand


arefinelybalanced,smallchangesinthe


environment can lead to big changes in


creditspreads.


Investorsknowhighlyleveragedcom-


panies are vulnerable so, as soon as the


outlook worsens, they head for the exit.


As the environment begins to improve,


theyflockbackjustasfasttogettheextra


yieldthatcorporatebondsprovide.


Instead of reducing the volatility of


credit spreads, central bank policy is


probably increasing it. The short credit


spreads of the 1970s in the US returned


to the longer, more normal cycles of the


1980s and 1990s only when the then-


Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker


hiked interest rates and made US yields


positiveoncemore.


Global central banks still seem far


from their Volcker moment. And as a


result, 2020 could be a much more


exciting year for global credit markets


thaninvestorsrealise.


Guy Stear is head of fixed income research


at Société Générale


Bewarecomplacency


ascorporatebond


dramacomescloser


Beards may be back along


with flared trousers but


the more important 1970s


parallellies in bond yields


FEBRUARY 19 2020 Section:Markets Time: 18/2/2020-18:40 User:stephen.smith Page Name:MARKETS2, Part,Page,Edition:EUR, 20 , 1

Free download pdf