A
relatively straightforward two-part
design, this all-aluminium affair aims to
provide cooling and protection without
taking up too much space – its overall footprint
is only marginally larger than Raspberry Pi 4 on
its own.
There are a few issues, though, starting with
its design. Like all aluminium cases, Pimoroni’s
heatsink case includes pillars designed to
contact hot-running chips and transfer
the heat to the outside of the case. The
installation instructions, however, tell
you to only add a thermal transfer pad to
the one in contact with the central SoC.
It turns out that this is because the RAM
pillar targets a chip which doesn’t get hot,With so little metal to play with, the Pimoroni
heatsink case gets noticeably warmer than
the competition.Even contacting only the SoC, the case
keeps Raspberry Pi 4 well below its
throttle point.while the pillar for the USB controller is both too
small and in the wrong place.
This, and a patchy anodised finish, aside, the
case does as promised: it prevents Raspberry Pi 4
from throttling, and keeps all ports and headers –
including GPIO, DSI, and CSI – readily accessible.A compact two-part design, a few flaws don’t
stop this case performing well
pimoroni.com magpi.cc/heatsinkcase £12 / $13.20Pimoroni Aluminium Heatsink
Case for Raspberry Pi 4
The pillar for the USB
controller is too small
and in the wrong place
DIMENSIONS:
88×56×22.4 mm
MATERIAL:
AluminiumWEIGHT (INC. ONE
RASPBERRY PI 4):
149 gNUMBER
OF BOARDS
SUPPORTED:
1
COOLING
METHOD:
Passive heatsink
(SoC only,
RAM and USB
3.0 controller
optional)EXTRAS:
Thermal transfer
material pads,
hex keySPECS
Verdict
The Pimoroni
Heatsink
Case does an
acceptable job of
cooling Raspberry
Pi 4, but feels
like a missed
opportunity. Fixing
the USB pillar and
adding one for the
PMIC would have
been welcomed.6 /10
CPU Temperature CPU Clock CPU Clock (Moving Average)Frequency(MHz)850110013501600Temperature(Degrees Celsius)4555657585Time (Seconds)200 400 600 800Thermal imaging Thermal load
Raspberry Pi thermal case group test magpi.cc 71REVIEW